5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Classification of Current Procedural Terminology Codes from Electronic Health Record Data Using Machine Learning

      research-article
      , MD, PhD 1 , , MD 1 , , MS 1 , , PhD 1 , , BS 1 , , MB ChB, MSc, MPH 1 , , MD 1 , , MD, MBA 1 , , Dr. med., MMM 1 , 2
      Anesthesiology

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          Accurate anesthesiology procedure code data is essential to quality improvement, research, and reimbursement tasks within anesthesiology practices. Advanced data science techniques including machine learning and natural language processing offer opportunities to develop classification tools for Current Procedural Terminology codes across anesthesia procedures.

          Methods:

          Models were created using a Train/Test dataset including 1,164,343 procedures from 16 academic and private hospitals. Five supervised machine learning models were created to classify anesthesiology Current Procedural Terminology codes, with accuracy defined as first choice classification matching the institutional-assigned code existing in the perioperative database. The two best performing models were further refined and tested on a Holdout dataset from a single institution distinct from Train/Test. A tunable confidence parameter was created to identify cases for which models were highly accurate, with the goal of ≥95% accuracy, above the reported 2018 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services fee-for-service accuracy. Actual submitted claim data from billing specialists was used as a reference standard.

          Results:

          Support vector machine and neural network label-embedding attentive models were the best performing models, respectively demonstrating overall accuracies of 87.9% and 84.2% (single best code), and 96.8% and 94.0% (within top three). Classification accuracy was 96.4% in 47.0% of cases using support vector machine and 94.4% in 62.2% of cases using label-embedding attentive model within the Train/Test dataset. In the Holdout dataset, respective classification accuracies were 93.1% in 58.0% of cases and 95.0% among 62.0%. The most important feature in model training was procedure text.

          Conclusions:

          Through application of machine learning and natural language processing techniques, highly accurate real-time models were created for anesthesiology Current Procedural Terminology code classification. The increased processing speed and a priori targeted accuracy of this classification approach may provide performance optimization and cost reduction for quality improvement, research, and reimbursement tasks reliant on anesthesiology procedure codes.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Role: Clinical Lecturer
          Role: Assistant Professor
          Role: Data Scientist
          Role: Computer Scientist
          Role: Computer Scientist
          Role: Clinical Lecturer
          Role: Assistant Professor
          Role: Associate Professor
          Role: Assistant Professor
          Journal
          1300217
          533
          Anesthesiology
          Anesthesiology
          Anesthesiology
          0003-3022
          1528-1175
          8 November 2020
          April 2020
          13 November 2020
          : 132
          : 4
          : 738-749
          Affiliations
          [1 ]University of Michigan Medical School, Department of Anesthesiology
          [2 ]Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
          Author notes
          Corresponding Author: Michael L Burns, MD PhD mlburns@ 123456med.umich.edu , Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 1H247 UH, SPC 5048, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-5048, Phone: 734-936-4171, Fax: 734-936-9091
          Article
          PMC7665375 PMC7665375 7665375 nihpa1644311
          10.1097/ALN.0000000000003150
          7665375
          32028374
          2acae79e-24d1-436e-9f0d-28d998c8a445
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article