Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multiparametric real‐time sensing of cytosolic physiology links hypoxia responses to mitochondrial electron transport

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references87

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The green fluorescent protein.

          R Tsien (1998)
          In just three years, the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria has vaulted from obscurity to become one of the most widely studied and exploited proteins in biochemistry and cell biology. Its amazing ability to generate a highly visible, efficiently emitting internal fluorophore is both intrinsically fascinating and tremendously valuable. High-resolution crystal structures of GFP offer unprecedented opportunities to understand and manipulate the relation between protein structure and spectroscopic function. GFP has become well established as a marker of gene expression and protein targeting in intact cells and organisms. Mutagenesis and engineering of GFP into chimeric proteins are opening new vistas in physiological indicators, biosensors, and photochemical memories.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Oxygen sensing in plants is mediated by an N-end rule pathway for protein destabilization.

            The majority of eukaryotic organisms rely on molecular oxygen for respiratory energy production. When the supply of oxygen is compromised, a variety of acclimation responses are activated to reduce the detrimental effects of energy depletion. Various oxygen-sensing mechanisms have been described that are thought to trigger these responses, but they each seem to be kingdom specific and no sensing mechanism has been identified in plants until now. Here we show that one branch of the ubiquitin-dependent N-end rule pathway for protein degradation, which is active in both mammals and plants, functions as an oxygen-sensing mechanism in Arabidopsis thaliana. We identified a conserved amino-terminal amino acid sequence of the ethylene response factor (ERF)-transcription factor RAP2.12 to be dedicated to an oxygen-dependent sequence of post-translational modifications, which ultimately lead to degradation of RAP2.12 under aerobic conditions. When the oxygen concentration is low-as during flooding-RAP2.12 is released from the plasma membrane and accumulates in the nucleus to activate gene expression for hypoxia acclimation. Our discovery of an oxygen-sensing mechanism opens up new possibilities for improving flooding tolerance in crops. © 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Homeostatic response to hypoxia is regulated by the N-end rule pathway in plants

              Plants and animals are obligate aerobes, requiring oxygen for mitochondrial respiration and energy production. In plants, an unanticipated decline in oxygen availability (hypoxia), as caused by root waterlogging or foliage submergence, triggers changes in gene transcription and mRNA translation that promote anaerobic metabolism and thus sustain substrate-level ATP production 1 . In contrast to animals 2 , oxygen sensing has not been ascribed to a mechanism of gene regulation in response to oxygen deprivation in plants. Here we show that the N-end rule pathway of targeted proteolysis acts as a homeostatic sensor of severe low oxygen in Arabidopsis, through its regulation of key hypoxia response transcription factors. We found that plants lacking components of the N-end rule pathway constitutively express core hypoxia response genes and are more tolerant of hypoxic stress. We identify the hypoxia-associated Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) Group VII transcription factors of Arabidopsis as substrates of this pathway. Regulation of these proteins by the N-end rule pathway occurs through a characteristic conserved motif at the N-terminus initiating with MetCys- (MC-). Enhanced stability of one of these proteins, HRE2, under low oxygen conditions improves hypoxia survival and reveals a molecular mechanism for oxygen sensing in plants via the evolutionarily conserved N-end rule pathway. SUB1A-1, a major determinant of submergence tolerance in rice 3 , was shown not to be a substrate for the N-end rule pathway despite containing the N-terminal motif, suggesting that it is uncoupled from N-end rule pathway regulation, and that enhanced stability may relate to the superior tolerance of Sub1 rice varieties to multiple abiotic stresses 4 .
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                New Phytologist
                New Phytol
                Wiley
                0028-646X
                1469-8137
                October 06 2019
                December 2019
                September 18 2019
                December 2019
                : 224
                : 4
                : 1668-1684
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology (IBBP) University of Münster Schlossplatz 8 D‐48143 Münster Germany
                [2 ]Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation (INRES) University of Bonn Friedrich‐Ebert‐Allee 144 D‐53113 Bonn Germany
                [3 ]Max‐Planck‐Institute for Plant Breeding Research Carl‐von‐Linné Weg 10 D‐50829 Cologne Germany
                [4 ]Institute for Cellular and Molecular Botany (IZMB) University of Bonn Kirschallee 1 D‐53115 Bonn Germany
                [5 ]Institute of Biology I RWTH Aachen University Worringerweg 1 D‐52074 Aachen Germany
                [6 ]Leibniz‐Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) Gatersleben, Corrensstraße 3 D‐06466 Seeland Germany
                [7 ]Department of Biology Lund University Sölvegatan 35 Lund 223 62 Sweden
                Article
                10.1111/nph.16093
                31386759
                2aa4cd0e-8c56-418a-93e3-0a1e6ec6cfe1
                © 2019

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content2,293

                Cited by49

                Most referenced authors954