9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reliability and usefulness of spirometry performed during admission for COPD exacerbation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Although not currently recommended, spirometry during hospitalization due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an opportunity to enhance the diagnosis of this disease. The aim of the present study was to assess the usefulness and reliability of spirometry before hospital discharge, comparing it to measurements obtained during clinical stability.

          Methods

          This prospective longitudinal observational study compares spirometry results before and 8 weeks after discharge in consecutive patients admitted for COPD exacerbation. Concordance between results was assessed by the Kappa index, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman graphs.

          Results

          From an initial population of 179 COPD patients, 100 completed the study (mean age 67.8 years, 83% men, 35% active smokers, FEV 1 at clinical stability 40.3%). Forty-nine patients could not complete the study because they did not reach clinical stability. In three patients with obstructive spirometry during admission, the results were normal at follow-up. In the remaining patients, the COPD diagnosis was confirmed at stability with acceptable concordance. In 27 cases, spirometry improved more than 200 mL.No variables were found to be associated with this improvement or to explain it.

          Conclusions

          This study provides information on the role of spirometry prior to hospital discharge in patients admitted for COPD exacerbation, demonstrating that it is a valid and reproducible method, representing an opportunity toimprove COPD diagnosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Determinants of underdiagnosis of COPD in national and international surveys.

          COPD ranks within the top three causes of mortality in the global burden of disease, yet it remains largely underdiagnosed. We assessed the underdiagnosis of COPD and its determinants in national and international surveys of general populations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report: GOLD Executive Summary.

            This Executive Summary of the Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of COPD (GOLD) 2017 Report focuses primarily on the revised and novel parts of the document. The most significant changes include: 1) the assessment of COPD has been refined to separate the spirometric assessment from symptom evaluation. ABCD groups are now proposed to be derived exclusively from patient symptoms and their history of exacerbations; 2) for each of the groups A to D, escalation strategies for pharmacological treatments are proposed; 3) the concept of de-escalation of therapy is introduced in the treatment assessment scheme; 4) nonpharmacologic therapies are comprehensively presented and; 5) the importance of comorbid conditions in managing COPD is reviewed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The COPD assessment test: a systematic review.

              The COPD assessment test (CAT) is a self-administered questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life. We aimed to systematically evaluate the literature for reliability, validity, responsiveness and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the CAT. Multiple databases were searched for studies analysing the psychometric properties of the CAT in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Two reviewers independently screened, selected and extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of relevant studies using the COSMIN checklist. From 792 records identified, 36 studies were included. The number of participants ranged from 45 to 6469, mean age from 56 to 73 years, and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s from 39% to 98% predicted. Internal consistency (reliability) was 0.85-0.98, and test-retest reliability was 0.80-0.96. Convergent and longitudinal validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient were: SGRQ-C 0.69-0.82 and 0.63, CCQ 0.68-0.78 and 0.60, and mMRC 0.29-0.61 and 0.20, respectively. Scores differed with GOLD stages, exacerbation and mMRC grades. Mean scores decreased with pulmonary rehabilitation (2.2-3 units) and increased at exacerbation onset (4.7 units). Only one study with adequate methodology reported an MCID of 2 units and 3.3-3.8 units using the anchor-based approach and distribution-based approach, respectively. Most studies had fair methodological quality. We conclude that the studies support the reliability and validity of the CAT and that the tool is responsive to interventions, although the MCID remains debatable.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Supervision
                Role: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Investigation
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Software
                Role: Data curationRole: Methodology
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                26 March 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 3
                : e0194983
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Pulmonary Department, Álvaro Cunqueiro Hospital, EOXI, Vigo, Spain
                [2 ] NeumoVigoI+i Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IISGS), Vigo, Spain
                [3 ] Medical-Surgical Unit of Respiratory Diseases, Sevilla Biomedical Research Institute (IBiS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Sevilla University, Spain
                [4 ] CIBER of Respiratory Diseases (CIBERES), Health Institute Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
                National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, GREECE
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The study was partially financed through unconditional aid from Ferrer laboratories. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7407-5249
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-1367
                Article
                PONE-D-18-02082
                10.1371/journal.pone.0194983
                5868846
                29579084
                2a5d9388-a8e1-4bdc-92ba-e5f4fa9265dd
                © 2018 Fernández-Villar et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 January 2018
                : 14 March 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 12
                Funding
                The study was financed with funding of our investigation institution and unconditional aid from Ferrer laboratories. Ferrer laboratories had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Bioassays and Physiological Analysis
                Respiratory Analysis
                Spirometry
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Research Validity
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Hospitals
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Bronchodilators
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Design
                Survey Research
                Questionnaires
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pulmonology
                Dyspnea
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article