3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Management of acute COPD exacerbations in Australia: do we follow the guidelines?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We aimed to assess adherence to the Australian national guideline (COPD-X) against audited practice, and to document the outcomes of patients hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at discharge and 28 days after.

          Methods

          A prospective clinical audit of COPD hospital admission from five tertiary care hospitals in five states of Australia was conducted. Post-discharge follow-up was conducted via telephone to assess for readmission and health status.

          Results

          There were 207 admissions for acute exacerbation (171 patients; mean 70.2 years old; 50.3% males). Readmission rates at 28 days were 25.4%, with one (0.6%) death during admission and eight (6.1%) post-discharge within 28 days. Concordance to the COPD-X guidance was variable; 22.7% performed spirometry, 81.1% had blood gases collected when forced expiratory volume in 1 s was <1 L, 99.5% had chest radiography performed, 95.1% were prescribed systemic corticosteroids and 95% were prescribed antibiotic therapy. There were 89.1% given oxygen therapy and 92.6% when arterial oxygen tension was <80 mmHg; 65.6% were given ventilatory assistance when pH was <7.35. Only 32.4% were referred to pulmonary rehabilitation but 76.8% had general practitioner follow-up arranged.

          Conclusion

          When compared against clinical practice guidelines, we found important gaps in management of patients admitted with COPD throughout tertiary care centres in Australia. Strategies to improve guideline uptake are needed to optimise care.

          Abstract

          A multisite audit of hospital admissions for patients experiencing #AECOPD in Australia highlighted important gaps in management when compared against national guidelines. Further focus on how we can improve guideline uptake by clinicians is needed. http://bit.ly/2VjGnHw

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability

          Background Guidelines continue to be underutilized, and a variety of strategies to improve their use have been suboptimal. Modifying guideline features represents an alternative, but untested way to promote their use. The purpose of this study was to identify and define features that facilitate guideline use, and examine whether and how they are included in current guidelines. Methods A guideline implementability framework was developed by reviewing the implementation science literature. We then examined whether guidelines included these, or additional implementability elements. Data were extracted from publicly available high quality guidelines reflecting primary and institutional care, reviewed independently by two individuals, who through discussion resolved conflicts, then by the research team. Results The final implementability framework included 22 elements organized in the domains of adaptability, usability, validity, applicability, communicability, accommodation, implementation, and evaluation. Data were extracted from 20 guidelines on the management of diabetes, hypertension, leg ulcer, and heart failure. Most contained a large volume of graded, narrative evidence, and tables featuring complementary clinical information. Few contained additional features that could improve guideline use. These included alternate versions for different users and purposes, summaries of evidence and recommendations, information to facilitate interaction with and involvement of patients, details of resource implications, and instructions on how to locally promote and monitor guideline use. There were no consistent trends by guideline topic. Conclusions Numerous opportunities were identified by which guidelines could be modified to support various types of decision making by different users. New governance structures may be required to accommodate development of guidelines with these features. Further research is needed to validate the proposed framework of guideline implementability, develop methods for preparing this information, and evaluate how inclusion of this information influences guideline use.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            BTS guideline for emergency oxygen use in adult patients.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Australian and New Zealand Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines.

              The aim of the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Guidelines (Guidelines) is to provide evidence-based recommendations for the practice of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) specific to Australian and New Zealand healthcare contexts.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJ Open Res
                ERJOR
                erjor
                ERJ Open Research
                European Respiratory Society
                2312-0541
                April 2020
                19 April 2020
                : 6
                : 2
                : 00270-2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
                [2 ]Avondale University College, Faculty of Nursing, Wahroonga, Australia
                [3 ]Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
                [4 ]School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
                [5 ]School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
                [6 ]Dept of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia
                [7 ]The Prince Charles Hospital and University of Queensland, Chermside, Australia
                [8 ]School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
                [9 ]Australian Respiratory and Sleep Medicine Institute, Flinders University and Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, Australia
                Author notes
                Vanessa M. McDonald, Hunter Medical Research Institute, 1 Kookaburra Circuit, New Lambton Heights, 2305, Newcastle, Australia. E-mail: vanessa.mcdonald@ 123456newcastle.edu.au
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-8856
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5676-6126
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5865-489X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-689X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-7561
                Article
                00270-2019
                10.1183/23120541.00270-2019
                7167211
                32337215
                a671ff62-c26d-407a-ada1-1f766a636c52
                Copyright ©ERS 2020

                This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Licence 4.0.

                History
                : 30 September 2019
                : 18 February 2020
                Categories
                Original Articles
                COPD
                1
                18

                Comments

                Comment on this article