2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Intersection Between Lateral Mass and Inferomedial Edge of the C1 Posterior Arch: A Reference Point for C1 Lateral Mass Screw Insertion

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To determine the ideal Atlas (C1) lateral mass screw placement and trajectory using the intersection between the lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch as an easily identifiable and reproducible medial reference point. Selection of an ideal entry point and trajectory of C1 lateral mass screw insertion can help to minimize neurovascular injuries. While various techniques for screw insertion have been proposed in the past, they all require extensive dissection of the C1 lateral mass, which can cause profuse bleeding.

          Methods

          Ninety-three 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructed images of C1 lateral masses in adult patients were utilized to simulate the placement of C1 lateral mass screws via 4 entry points and 2 trajectory angles referencing off of a medial reference point using Vero’s VISI 17 software. The safety during screw insertion simulation, as well as the screw length, were evaluated.

          Results

          We found that C1 lateral mass screws could be safely placed bilaterally at 3 mm lateral to the reference point in both 0° and 15° medial screw angulation without violation of the cortex. The 15° medial angulation allowed for longer (18 mm) screws than the 0° angulation.

          Conclusion

          We recommend starting C1 lateral mass screws 3 mm lateral to the intersection between the lateral mass and inferomedial edge of the posterior arch at a 15° medial angulation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation.

          A novel technique of atlantoaxial stabilization using individual fixation of the C1 lateral mass and the C2 pedicle with minipolyaxial screws and rods is described. In addition, the initial results of this technique on 37 patients are described. To describe the technique and the initial clinical and radiographic results for posterior C1-C2 fixation with a new implant system. Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex is a challenging procedure because of the unique anatomy of this region. Fixation by transarticular screws combined with posterior wiring and structural bone grafting leads to excellent fusion rates. The technique is technically demanding and has a potential risk of injury to the vertebral artery. In addition, this procedure cannot be used in the presence of fixed subluxation of C1 on C2 and in the case of an aberrant path of the vertebral artery. To address these limitations, a new technique of C1-C2 fixation has been developed: bilateral insertion of polyaxial-head screws in the lateral mass of C1 and through the pars interarticularis into the pedicle of C2, followed by a fluoroscopically controlled reduction maneuver and rod fixation. After posterior exposure of the C1-C2 complex, the 3.5-mm polyaxial screws are inserted in the lateral masses of C1. Two polyaxial screws are then inserted into the pars interarticularis of C2. Drilling is guided by anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy. If necessary, reduction of C1 onto C2 can be accomplished by manipulation of the implants, followed by fixation to the 3-mm rod. For definitive fusion, cancellous bone can be added. No structural bone graft or wiring is required. In selected cases, e.g., C1-C2 subluxation or fractures in young patients in whom only temporary fixation is necessary, the instrumentation can be removed after an appropriate time. Because the joint surfaces stay intact, the patient can regain motion in the C1-C2 joints. Thirty-seven patients underwent this procedure. No neural or vascular damage related to this technique has been observed. The early clinical and radiologic follow-up data indicate solid fusion in all patients. Fixation of the atlantoaxial complex using polyaxial-head screws and rods seems to be a reliable technique and should be considered an efficient alternative to the previously reported techniques.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo.

            The accuracy of pedicular screw placement was assessed in 40 consecutive patients treated with the AO "Fixateur Interne." Postoperative CT scans were used to measure canal encroachment from the medial border of the pedicle, the angle of insertion and the point of entry. Eighty-one percent of the screws were placed within 2 mm of the medial border of the pedicle and 6% had 4-8 mm of canal encroachment with two patients developing minor neurological complications that spontaneously resolved. Four percent were inserted lateral to the pedicle. The parameters linked to satisfactory screw placement include entry point, angle of insertion and pedicular isthmus widths. Improvement in accuracy was noted in the latter 25% of screw insertions, reflecting the learning curve associated with this technique.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Factors affecting the pullout strength of cancellous bone screws.

              Screws placed into cancellous bone in orthopedic surgical applications, such as fixation of fractures of the femoral neck or the lumbar spine, can be subjected to high loads. Screw pullout is a possibility, especially if low density osteoporotic bone is encountered. The overall goal of this study was to determine how screw thread geometry, tapping, and cannulation affect the holding power of screws in cancellous bone and determine whether current designs achieve maximum purchase strength. Twelve types of commercially available cannulated and noncannulated cancellous bone screws were tested for pullout strength in rigid unicellular polyurethane foams of apparent densities and shear strengths within the range reported for human cancellous bone. The experimentally derived pullout strength was compared to a predicted shear failure force of the internal threads formed in the polyurethane foam. Screws embedded in porous materials pullout by shearing the internal threads in the porous material. Experimental pullout force was highly correlated to the predicted shear failure force (slope = 1.05, R2 = 0.947) demonstrating that it is controlled by the major diameter of the screw, the length of engagement of the thread, the shear strength of the material into which the screw is embedded, and a thread shape factor (TSF) which accounts for screw thread depth and pitch. The average TSF for cannulated screws was 17 percent lower than that of noncannulated cancellous screws, and the pullout force was correspondingly less. Increasing the TSF, a result of decreasing thread pitch or increasing thread depth, increases screw purchase strength in porous materials. Tapping was found to reduce pullout force by an average of 8 percent compared with nontapped holes (p = 0.0001). Tapping in porous materials decreases screw pullout strength because the removal of material by the tap enlarges hole volume by an average of 27 percent, in effect decreasing the depth and shear area of the internal threads in the porous material.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neurospine
                Neurospine
                NS
                Neurospine
                Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
                2586-6583
                2586-6591
                June 2021
                30 June 2021
                : 18
                : 2
                : 328-335
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
                [2 ]Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Och Spine Hospital/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author Wongthawat Liawrungrueang https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-6569 Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Intrawaroros Rd. Sriphum, Muang Chiang Mai, Thailand 50200 Email: mint1871@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4491-6569
                Article
                ns-2040814-407
                10.14245/ns.2040814.407
                8255764
                34218613
                2a080927-b456-472d-9d42-bdc1c5f3673e
                Copyright © 2021 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 December 2020
                : 17 February 2021
                : 18 February 2021
                Categories
                Original Article

                atlantoaxial fixation,c1 lateral mass screw fixation,isolated medial reference,inferomedial edge of posterior c1 arch,mediolateral trajectory,craniocaudal trajectory

                Comments

                Comment on this article