15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          We sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion and examine any association between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality in sepsis.

          Methods

          This was a prospective, formally designed substudy of participants in the Protocolized Care in Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) trial. We recruited from six sites with the equipment and training to perform these study procedures. All subjects were adults with septic shock, and each was assigned to alternative resuscitation strategies. The two main analyses assessed (1) the impact of resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion parameters and (2) the association of microcirculatory perfusion with 60-day in-hospital mortality. We measured sublingual microcirculatory perfusion using sidestream dark field in vivo video microscopy at the completion of the 6-h ProCESS resuscitation protocol and then again at 24 and 72 h.

          Results

          We enrolled 207 subjects (demographics were similar to the overall ProCESS cohort) and observed 40 (19.3%) deaths. There were no differences in average perfusion characteristics between treatment arms. Analyzing the relationship between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality, we found an association between vascular density parameters and mortality. Total vascular density (beta = 0.006, p < 0.003), perfused vascular density (beta = 0.005, p < 0.04), and De Backer score (beta = 0.009, p < 0.01) were higher overall in survivors in a generalized estimating equation model, and this association was significant at the 72-h time point ( p < 0.05 for each parameter).

          Conclusions

          Microcirculatory perfusion did not differ between three early septic shock treatment arms. We found an association between microcirculatory perfusion parameters of vascular density at 72 h and mortality.

          Trial registration

          ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00510835. Registered on August 2, 2007.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference

          (1992)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The microcirculation is the motor of sepsis

            Can Ince (2005)
            Regional tissue distress caused by microcirculatory dysfunction and mitochondrial depression underlies the condition in sepsis and shock where, despite correction of systemic oxygen delivery variables, regional hypoxia and oxygen extraction deficit persist. We have termed this condition microcirculatory and mitochondrial distress syndrome (MMDS). Orthogonal polarization spectral imaging allowed the first clinical observation of the microcirculation in human internal organs, and has identified the pivotal role of microcirculatory abnormalities in defining the severity of sepsis, a condition not revealed by systemic hemodynamic or oxygen-derived variables. Recently, sublingual sidestream dark-field (SDF) imaging has been introduced, allowing observation of the microcirculation in even greater detail. Microcirculatory recruitment is needed to ensure adequate microcirculatory perfusion and the oxygenation of tissue cells that follows. In sepsis, where inflammation-induced autoregulatory dysfunction persists and oxygen need is not matched by supply, the microcirculation can be recruited by reducing pathological shunting, promoting microcirculatory perfusion, supporting pump function, and controlling hemorheology and coagulation. Resuscitation following MMDS must include focused recruitment of hypoxic-shunted microcirculatory units and/or resuscitation of the mitochondria. A combination of agents is required for successful rescue of the microcirculation. Single compounds such as activated protein C, which acts on multiple pathways, can be expected to be beneficial in rescuing the microcirculation in sepsis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory alterations in patients with septic shock are independent of its systemic effects.

              To evaluate the effects of dobutamine on microcirculatory blood flow alterations in patients with septic shock. Prospective, open-label study. A 31-bed, medico-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Twenty-two patients with septic shock. Intravenous administration of dobutamine (5 mug/kg.min) for 2 hrs (n = 22) followed by the addition of 10 M acetylcholine (topically applied, n = 10). Complete hemodynamic measurements were obtained before and after dobutamine administration. In addition, the sublingual microcirculation was investigated with an orthogonal polarization spectral imaging technique before and after dobutamine administration and after topical application of acetylcholine. Dobutamine significantly improved capillary perfusion (from 48 +/- 15 to 67 +/- 11%, p = .001), but with large individual variation, whereas capillary density remained stable. The addition of topical acetylcholine completely restored capillary perfusion (98 +/- 1%, p = .001) and capillary density. The changes in capillary perfusion during dobutamine administration were not related to changes in cardiac index (p = .45) or arterial pressure (p = .29). Interestingly, the decrease in lactate levels was proportional to the improvement in capillary perfusion (y = 0.07 - 0.02x, r = .46, p = .005) but not to changes in cardiac index (p = .55). The administration of 5 mug/kg.min dobutamine can improve but not restore capillary perfusion in patients with septic shock. These changes are independent of changes in systemic hemodynamic variables.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                mmassey@mothmop.com
                phou@partners.org
                mfilbin@partners.org
                henry.e.wang@uth.tmc.edu
                lngo@bidmc.harvard.edu
                huangdt@ccm.upmc.edu
                waird@bidmc.harvard.edu
                vnovack@medoracle.com
                trzeciak-Stephen@cooperhealth.edu
                yealydm@upmc.edu
                kellum@pitt.edu
                angusdc@ccm.upmc.edu
                (617) 754-2323 , nshapiro@bidmc.harvard.edu
                processmicroscan@list.pitt.edu
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                20 November 2018
                20 November 2018
                2018
                : 22
                : 308
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9011 8547, GRID grid.239395.7, Department of Emergency Medicine and Center for Vascular Biology Research, , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, ; 1 Deaconess Road, CC2-W, Boston, MA 02215 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0378 8294, GRID grid.62560.37, Department of Emergency Medicine, , Brigham and Women’s Hospital, ; Boston, MA USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0386 9924, GRID grid.32224.35, Department of Emergency Medicine, , Massachusetts General Hospital, ; Boston, MA USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000000106344187, GRID grid.265892.2, Department of Emergency Medicine, , University of Alabama at Birmingham, ; Birmingham, AL USA
                [5 ]Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Isarel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Critical Care Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9011 8547, GRID grid.239395.7, Division of Molecular Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Center for Vascular Biology Research, , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, ; Boston, MA USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0470 8989, GRID grid.412686.f, Clinical Research Center, , Soroka University Medical Center, ; Be’er-Sheva, Israel
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0384 9827, GRID grid.411896.3, Center for Critical Care Services, , Cooper University Hospital, ; Camden, NJ USA
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9000, GRID grid.21925.3d, Department of Emergency Medicine, , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, ; Pittsburgh, PA USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3508-4390
                Article
                2240
                10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5
                6245723
                30458880
                28c5e1c2-1d85-4fa8-84fb-c7b7392f8809
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 5 April 2018
                : 15 October 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000050, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute;
                Award ID: R01 HL091757
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057, National Institute of General Medical Sciences;
                Award ID: P50 GM076659
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                sepsis,microcirculation,pathophysiology,mortality
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                sepsis, microcirculation, pathophysiology, mortality

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content423

                Cited by40

                Most referenced authors546