21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Heart Failure Risk Stratification and Efficacy of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are at increased risk of developing heart failure (HF). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of hospitalization for HF (HHF) in patients with T2DM. We aimed to develop and validate a practical clinical risk score for HHF in patients with T2DM and assess whether this score can identify high-risk patients with T2DM who have the greatest reduction in risk for HHF with an SGLT2 inhibitor. We developed a clinical risk score for HHF in 8,212 patients with T2DM in the placebo arm of SAVOR-TIMI 53. Candidate variables were assessed using multivariable Cox regression, and independent clinical risk indicators achieving statistical significance of p<0.001 were included in the risk score. We externally validated the score in 8,578 patients with T2DM in the placebo arm of DECLARE-TIMI 58. The relative and absolute risk reductions in HHF with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin were assessed by baseline HHF risk. Five clinical variables were independent risk predictors of HHF: prior HF, history of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR). A simple integer-based score (0–7 points) using these predictors identified a >20-fold gradient of HHF risk (p-trend <0.001) in both the derivation and validation cohorts, with c-indices of 0.81 and 0.78, respectively. Whereas relative risk reductions with dapagliflozin were similar for patients across the risk scores (25–34%), absolute risk reductions were greater in those at higher baseline risk (χ 2 3.24; one-sided p-trend=0.04), with high-risk (2 points) and very high-risk patients (≥3 points) having 1.5% and 2.7% absolute reductions in Kaplan-Meier estimates of HHF risk at 4 years. Risk stratification using a novel clinical risk score for HHF in patients with T2DM identifies patients at higher risk for HHF who derive greater absolute benefit from SGLT2 inhibition. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifiers: and .

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Comparison of the Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptor Agonists and Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors for Prevention of MajorAdverse Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials

          Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have emerged as 2 new classes of antihyperglycemic agents that also reduce cardiovascular risk. The relative benefits in patients with and without established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease for different outcomes with these classes of drugs remain undefined.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme.

            To determine whether the risk of adverse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes associated with diabetes differs in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction (EF) heart failure (HF). We analysed outcomes in the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme which randomized 7599 patients with symptomatic HF and a broad range of EF. The prevalence of diabetes was 28.3% in patients with preserved EF (>40%) and 28.5% in those with low EF (
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Hospitalization for Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Events, and Death: Outcomes at 4 Years From the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry.

              Despite the known association of diabetes mellitus with cardiovascular events, there are few contemporary data on the long-term outcomes from international cohorts of patients with diabetes mellitus. We sought to describe cardiovascular outcomes at 4 years and to identify predictors of these events in patients with diabetes mellitus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Circulation
                Circulation
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                0009-7322
                1524-4539
                November 05 2019
                November 05 2019
                : 140
                : 19
                : 1569-1577
                Affiliations
                [1 ]TIMI Study Group, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (D.D.B., S.D.W., B.M.S., Y.G., S.A.M., D.L.B., E.B., M.S.S.).
                [2 ]Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel (O.M., I.R.).
                [3 ]Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Canada (L.A.L.).
                [4 ]University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (D.K.M.).
                [5 ]University of Liverpool, United Kingdom (J.P.H.W.).
                [6 ]AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden (P.J., P.A.J., A.M.L.).
                Article
                10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042685
                6829059
                31474116
                27e9de2c-c14a-4cf5-b0e4-f7098c694a06
                © 2019
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content2,499

                Cited by43

                Most referenced authors936