18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Socioeconomic status, health inequalities and non-communicable diseases: a systematic review

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          A comprehensive approach to health highlights its close relationship with the social and economic conditions, physical environment and individual lifestyles. However, this relationship is not exempt from methodological problems that may bias the establishment of direct effects between the variables studied. Thus, further research is necessary to investigate the role of socioeconomic variables, their composition and distribution according to health status, particularly on non-communicable diseases.

          Subjects and methods

          To shed light on this field, here a systematic review is performed using PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science. A 7-year retrospective horizon was considered until 21 July 2017.

          Results

          Twenty-six papers were obtained from the database search. Additionally, results from “hand searching” were also included, where a wider horizon was considered. Five of the 26 studies analyzed used aggregated data compared to 21 using individual data. Eleven considered income as a study variable, while 17 analyzed the effect of income inequality on health status (2 of the studies considered both the absolute level and distribution of income). The most used indicator of inequality in the literature was the Gini index.

          Conclusion

          Although different types of analysis produce very different results concerning the role of health determinants, the general conclusion is that income distribution is related to health where it represents a measure of the differences in social class in the society. The effect of income inequality is to increase the gap between social classes or to widen differences in status.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence.

          Whether or not the scale of a society's income inequality is a determinant of population health is still regarded as a controversial issue. We decided to review the evidence and see if we could find a consistent interpretation of both the positive and negative findings. We identified 168 analyses in 155 papers reporting research findings on the association between income distribution and population health, and classified them according to how far their findings supported the hypothesis that greater income differences are associated with lower standards of population health. Analyses in which all adjusted associations between greater income equality and higher standards of population health were statistically significant and positive were classified as "wholly supportive"; if none were significant and positive they were classified as "unsupportive"; and if some but not all were significant and supportive they were classified as "partially supportive". Of those classified as either wholly supportive or unsupportive, a large majority (70 per cent) suggest that health is less good in societies where income differences are bigger. There were substantial differences in the proportion of supportive findings according to whether inequality was measured in large or small areas. We suggest that the studies of income inequality are more supportive in large areas because in that context income inequality serves as a measure of the scale of social stratification, or how hierarchical a society is. We suggest three explanations for the unsupportive findings reported by a minority of studies. First, many studies measured inequality in areas too small to reflect the scale of social class differences in a society; second, a number of studies controlled for factors which, rather than being genuine confounders, are likely either to mediate between class and health or to be other reflections of the scale of social stratification; and third, the international relationship was temporarily lost (in all but the youngest age groups) during the decade from the mid-1980s when income differences were widening particularly rapidly in a number of countries. We finish by discussing possible objections to our interpretation of the findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study.

            The Whitehall study of British civil servants begun in 1967, showed a steep inverse association between social class, as assessed by grade of employment, and mortality from a wide range of diseases. Between 1985 and 1988 we investigated the degree and causes of the social gradient in morbidity in a new cohort of 10,314 civil servants (6900 men, 3414 women) aged 35-55 (the Whitehall II study). Participants were asked to answer a self-administered questionnaire and attend a screening examination. In the 20 years separating the two studies there has been no diminution in social class difference in morbidity: we found an inverse association between employment grade and prevalence of angina, electrocardiogram evidence of ischaemia, and symptoms of chronic bronchitis. Self-perceived health status and symptoms were worse in subjects in lower status jobs. There were clear employment-grade differences in health-risk behaviours including smoking, diet, and exercise, in economic circumstances, in possible effects of early-life environment as reflected by height, in social circumstances at work (eg, monotonous work characterised by low control and low satisfaction), and in social supports. Healthy behaviours should be encouraged across the whole of society; more attention should be paid to the social environments, job design, and the consequences of income inequality.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Socioeconomic determinants of health. Health inequalities: relative or absolute material standards?

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                slagop@uvigo.es
                david.cantarero@unican.es
                berta@udc.es
                marta.pascual@unican.es
                carla.blazquez@unican.es
                bcasal@udc.es
                francisco.reyes@uvigo.es
                Journal
                Z Gesundh Wiss
                Z Gesundh Wiss
                Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2198-1833
                1613-2238
                17 October 2017
                17 October 2017
                2018
                : 26
                : 1
                : 1-14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 6738, GRID grid.6312.6, GEN Governance and Economics Network-Spain, Faculty of Business and Tourism University of Vigo, ; Campus Universitario As Lagoas s/n, 32004 Ourense, Spain
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2097 6738, GRID grid.6312.6, Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Business and Tourism University of Vigo, ; Campus Universitario As Lagoas s/n, 32004 Ourense, Spain
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1770 272X, GRID grid.7821.c, Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics University of Cantabria, ; Avda. de los Castros, S/N, 39005 Santander, Spain
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2176 8535, GRID grid.8073.c, Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics University of A Coruña, ; Campus de Elviña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0204-7174
                Article
                850
                10.1007/s10389-017-0850-z
                5794817
                29416959
                26b8112e-eeeb-4656-acb3-e82c875fb7e1
                © The Author(s) 2017, corrected publication January/2018

                Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 23 May 2017
                : 25 September 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020
                Award ID: 643576
                Categories
                Review Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

                Medicine
                socioeconomic status,health inequalities,non-communicable diseases,systematic review
                Medicine
                socioeconomic status, health inequalities, non-communicable diseases, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article