36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      “It Was Scary, But Then It Was Kind of Exciting”: Young Women’s Experiences with Choking During Sex

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Choking/strangulation during sex is prevalent among young adults, with one study finding that 58% of women college students had ever been choked during sex. However, no qualitative study has examined women’s experiences with choking/strangulation during sex outside of intimate partner violence. The purpose of our qualitative interview study was to investigate women’s experiences with choking and/or being choked during partnered sex. Through in-depth interviews with 24 undergraduate and graduate women students ages 18 to 33, we sought to understand how women communicate about choking, their learning about and initiation into choking, their feelings about being choked and choking others, as well as consent and safety practices used in relation to choking. We found that women had first learned about choking through diverse sources including pornography, erotic stories, magazines, social media, friends, and partners. While all 24 women had been choked during sex, only 13 of 24 had ever choked a partner. They described having engaged in choking with men as well as women and with committed as well as more casual partner types. Participants described consensual and non-consensual choking experiences. While many women enjoyed choking, others did it largely to please their sexual partner. Women described different methods and intensities of having been choked. Although very few had ever sought out information on safety practices or risk reduction, and only some had established safe words or safe gestures with partners, participants consistently expressed a belief that the ways in which they and their partner(s) engaged in choking were safe.

          Related collections

          Most cited references57

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Thematic Analysis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough?

            Saturation is a core guiding principle to determine sample sizes in qualitative research, yet little methodological research exists on parameters that influence saturation. Our study compared two approaches to assessing saturation: code saturation and meaning saturation. We examined sample sizes needed to reach saturation in each approach, what saturation meant, and how to assess saturation. Examining 25 in-depth interviews, we found that code saturation was reached at nine interviews, whereby the range of thematic issues was identified. However, 16 to 24 interviews were needed to reach meaning saturation where we developed a richly textured understanding of issues. Thus, code saturation may indicate when researchers have "heard it all," but meaning saturation is needed to "understand it all." We used our results to develop parameters that influence saturation, which may be used to estimate sample sizes for qualitative research proposals or to document in publications the grounds on which saturation was achieved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sexual compliance: gender, motivational, and relationship perspectives.

              This paper provides a systematic review of research on sexual compliance in heterosexual relationships. Three perspectives shed light on which individuals are the most likely to comply with a sexually interested partner's desire for sex and why. A gender perspective highlights the common male-female asymmetry in compliant sexual behavior and identifies factors that contribute to women's greater likelihood of being the sexually compliant partner. A motivational perspective distinguishes between approach and avoidance motives for compliance and considers the possible consequences of these motives for emotional reactions, sexual risk taking, and sexual violence. A relationship maintenance perspective views sexual compliance as illustrative of broader patterns of sacrifice in committed relationships. Each perspective suggests important new directions for empirical research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                debby@indiana.edu
                Journal
                Arch Sex Behav
                Arch Sex Behav
                Archives of Sexual Behavior
                Springer US (New York )
                0004-0002
                1573-2800
                10 November 2021
                : 1-21
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.411377.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 959X, Department of Applied Health Science, Indiana University School of Public Health-Bloomington, , Indiana University, ; Bloomington, IN 47401 USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.411377.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 959X, Center for Sexual Health Promotion, , Indiana University, ; Bloomington, IN USA
                [3 ]GRID grid.411377.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 959X, Department of Counseling and Educational Psychology, School of Education, , Indiana University, ; Bloomington, USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.411377.7, ISNI 0000 0001 0790 959X, PH 116, Indiana University School of Public Health, , Indiana University, ; Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0352-2248
                Article
                2049
                10.1007/s10508-021-02049-x
                8579901
                34761344
                2695ee9a-8a79-47ec-b310-c3a2170e4365
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                : 24 December 2020
                : 21 April 2021
                : 15 May 2021
                Categories
                Original Paper

                Sexual medicine
                choking,strangulation,sexual asphyxia,breath play,kink,bdsm
                Sexual medicine
                choking, strangulation, sexual asphyxia, breath play, kink, bdsm

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content233

                Cited by15

                Most referenced authors386