15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Social Undermining and Three Forms of Organizational Commitment : The Moderating Role of Employees’ Attachment Style

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract. In this study, we set out to challenge the widely held belief that mistreatment will always lower feelings of organizational commitment. We test this widespread belief by examining the relationship between social undermining (SU) and three forms of organizational commitment, affective, normative, and continuance commitment. Using time-lagged data provided by an online panel of 626 working adults, we found that exposure to SU lowered reported levels of affective (emotion-based) and normative (obligation-based) commitment but increased the level of continuance (economic-based) commitment. Subsequent moderated regression analyses revealed that the negative relations between SU and both affective and normative commitment were nuanced – they were both stronger for individuals whose anxious attachment was low rather than high. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references67

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

          Interest in the problem of method biases has a long history in the behavioral sciences. Despite this, a comprehensive summary of the potential sources of method biases and how to control for them does not exist. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to examine the extent to which method biases influence behavioral research results, identify potential sources of method biases, discuss the cognitive processes through which method biases influence responses to measures, evaluate the many different procedural and statistical techniques that can be used to control method biases, and provide recommendations for how to select appropriate procedural and statistical remedies for different types of research settings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it.

            Despite the concern that has been expressed about potential method biases, and the pervasiveness of research settings with the potential to produce them, there is disagreement about whether they really are a problem for researchers in the behavioral sciences. Therefore, the purpose of this review is to explore the current state of knowledge about method biases. First, we explore the meaning of the terms "method" and "method bias" and then we examine whether method biases influence all measures equally. Next, we review the evidence of the effects that method biases have on individual measures and on the covariation between different constructs. Following this, we evaluate the procedural and statistical remedies that have been used to control method biases and provide recommendations for minimizing method bias.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                pps
                Journal of Personnel Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing
                1866-5888
                2190-5150
                August 10, 2022
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management, Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
                [ 2 ]Department of Management and Marketing, Rhode Island College, Providence, RI, USA
                Author notes
                Emma Lei Jing, Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship and Management, Alberta School of Business, University of Alberta, 11211 Saskatchewan Drive NW, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R6, Canada, ljing1@ 123456ualberta.ca
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8870-6443
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7660-2548
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9850-9053
                Article
                pps_a000307_-1_1
                10.1027/1866-5888/a000307
                249f69c3-37a1-4459-ad9f-d404cf8f2c7f
                Copyright @ 2022
                History
                : August 18, 2021
                : April 5, 2022
                : May 6, 2022
                Categories
                Original Article

                Assessment, Evaluation & Research methods,Psychology,General behavioral science
                organizational commitment,attachment theory,abusive supervision,social undermining,attachment styles

                Comments

                Comment on this article