7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy scale for professional caregivers

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aim

          To develop and validate a scale for measuring professional caregivers’ ethical self-efficacy in dementia care.

          Background

          Professional caregivers of people with dementia make ethical decisions on a day-to-day basis, and it is important that they feel confident when doing so. Moreover, confidence, or self-efficacy, influences caregivers’ behaviour and well-being and may be a predictor of competence. However, there is no scale for measuring ethical self-efficacy. This study aims to fill this gap.

          Methods

          This study concerns the development and prima facie validation of the Dementia-Specific Ethical Self-Efficacy (DemESE) scale. During development, we identified dementia-specific ethical principles and generated items representing ethical conflicts of principles. In the subsequent validation, we administered the scale to experts and professional caregivers in dementia care. We assessed the relevance of the scale using a content validity index and tested validity and reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. To further enhance validity, we compared the scale with analogous self-efficacy scales using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

          Results

          The quantitative testing of DemESE revealed that the scale exhibited acceptable levels of internal consistency and reliability. This finding was supported by Cronbach’s alpha. In addition, the content validity index and Pearson correlation coefficient provided evidence of the scale’s relevance and validity.

          Conclusion

          The results suggest that DemESE is a promising tool for assessing professional caregivers’ ethical self-efficacy in dementia care and may be used to measure ethical self-efficacy – that is, confidence in ethical decision-making in dementia care.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer

              Scale development and validation are critical to much of the work in the health, social, and behavioral sciences. However, the constellation of techniques required for scale development and evaluation can be onerous, jargon-filled, unfamiliar, and resource-intensive. Further, it is often not a part of graduate training. Therefore, our goal was to concisely review the process of scale development in as straightforward a manner as possible, both to facilitate the development of new, valid, and reliable scales, and to help improve existing ones. To do this, we have created a primer for best practices for scale development in measuring complex phenomena. This is not a systematic review, but rather the amalgamation of technical literature and lessons learned from our experiences spent creating or adapting a number of scales over the past several decades. We identified three phases that span nine steps. In the first phase, items are generated and the validity of their content is assessed. In the second phase, the scale is constructed. Steps in scale construction include pre-testing the questions, administering the survey, reducing the number of items, and understanding how many factors the scale captures. In the third phase, scale evaluation, the number of dimensions is tested, reliability is tested, and validity is assessed. We have also added examples of best practices to each step. In sum, this primer will equip both scientists and practitioners to understand the ontology and methodology of scale development and validation, thereby facilitating the advancement of our understanding of a range of health, social, and behavioral outcomes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Dementia
                Dementia
                SAGE Publications
                1471-3012
                1741-2684
                August 2024
                June 14 2024
                August 2024
                : 23
                : 6
                : 1036-1051
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark
                Article
                10.1177/14713012241262833
                38876118
                24557d04-0184-483c-ad47-3e7c20c3d933
                © 2024

                https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Cited by2

                Most referenced authors597