157
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      RAD51 foci as a functional biomarker of homologous recombination repair and PARP inhibitor resistance in germline BRCA-mutated breast cancer

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 4 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 4 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 8 , 7 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 3 , 14 , 8 , 7 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 3 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 5 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 10 , 4 , 25 , 26 , 2 , 3 , 1 , 24
      Annals of Oncology
      Oxford University Press
      germline BRCA, PARP inhibitor resistance, homologous recombination, RAD51, TP53BP1, ATM

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2)-deficient tumors display impaired homologous recombination repair (HRR) and enhanced sensitivity to DNA damaging agents or to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi). Their efficacy in germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated metastatic breast cancers has been recently confirmed in clinical trials. Numerous mechanisms of PARPi resistance have been described, whose clinical relevance in gBRCA-mutated breast cancer is unknown. This highlights the need to identify functional biomarkers to better predict PARPi sensitivity.

          Patients and methods

          We investigated the in vivo mechanisms of PARPi resistance in gBRCA1 patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDXs) exhibiting differential response to PARPi. Analysis included exome sequencing and immunostaining of DNA damage response proteins to functionally evaluate HRR. Findings were validated in a retrospective sample set from gBRCA1/2-cancer patients treated with PARPi.

          Results

          RAD51 nuclear foci, a surrogate marker of HRR functionality, were the only common feature in PDX and patient samples with primary or acquired PARPi resistance. Consistently, low RAD51 was associated with objective response to PARPi. Evaluation of the RAD51 biomarker in untreated tumors was feasible due to endogenous DNA damage. In PARPi-resistant gBRCA1 PDXs, genetic analysis found no in-frame secondary mutations, but BRCA1 hypomorphic proteins in 60% of the models, TP53BP1-loss in 20% and RAD51-amplification in one sample, none mutually exclusive. Conversely, one of three PARPi-resistant gBRCA2 tumors displayed BRCA2 restoration by exome sequencing. In PDXs, PARPi resistance could be reverted upon combination of a PARPi with an ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) inhibitor.

          Conclusion

          Detection of RAD51 foci in gBRCA tumors correlates with PARPi resistance regardless of the underlying mechanism restoring HRR function. This is a promising biomarker to be used in the clinic to better select patients for PARPi therapy. Our study also supports the clinical development of PARPi combinations such as those with ATM inhibitors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer

          Background: Defects in BRCA1, BRCA2, and other members of the homologous recombination pathway have potential therapeutic relevance when used to support agents that introduce or exploit double-stranded DNA breaks. This study examines the association between homologous recombination defects and genomic patterns of loss of heterozygosity (LOH). Methods: Ovarian tumours from two independent data sets were characterised for defects in BRCA1, BRCA2, and RAD51C, and LOH profiles were generated. Publically available data were downloaded for a third independent data set. The same analyses were performed on 57 cancer cell lines. Results: Loss of heterozygosity regions of intermediate size were observed more frequently in tumours with defective BRCA1 or BRCA2 (P=10−11). The homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score was defined as the number of these regions observed in a tumour sample. The association between HRD score and BRCA deficiency was validated in two independent ovarian cancer data sets (P=10−5 and 10−29), and identified breast and pancreatic cell lines with BRCA defects. Conclusion: The HRD score appears capable of detecting homologous recombination defects regardless of aetiology or mechanism. This score could facilitate the use of PARP inhibitors and platinum in breast, ovarian, and other cancers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Genomic scars as biomarkers of homologous recombination deficiency and drug response in breast and ovarian cancers

            Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapies have been found to be particularly effective in tumors that harbor deleterious germline or somatic mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, the products of which contribute to the conservative homologous recombination repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Nonetheless, several setbacks in clinical trial settings have highlighted some of the issues surrounding the investigation of PARP inhibitors, especially the identification of patients who stand to benefit from such drugs. One potential approach to finding this patient subpopulation is to examine the tumor DNA for evidence of a homologous recombination defect. However, although the genomes of many breast and ovarian cancers are replete with aberrations, the presence of numerous factors able to shape the genomic landscape means that only some of the observed DNA abnormalities are the outcome of a cancer cell’s inability to faithfully repair DNA double-strand breaks. Consequently, recently developed methods for comprehensively capturing the diverse ways in which homologous recombination deficiencies may arise beyond BRCA1/2 mutation have used DNA microarray and sequencing data to account for potentially confounding features in the genome. Scores capturing telomeric allelic imbalance, loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and large scale transition score, as well as the total number of coding mutations are measures that summarize the total burden of certain forms of genomic abnormality. By contrast, other studies have comprehensively catalogued different types of mutational pattern and their relative contributions to a given tumor sample. Although at least one study to explore the use of the LOH scar in a prospective clinical trial of a PARP inhibitor in ovarian cancer is under way, limitations that result in a relatively low positive predictive value for these biomarkers remain. Tumors whose genome has undergone one or more events that restore high-fidelity homologous recombination are likely to be misclassified as double-strand break repair-deficient and thereby sensitive to PARP inhibitors and DNA damaging chemotherapies as a result of prior repair deficiency and its genomic scarring. Therefore, we propose that integration of a genomic scar-based biomarker with a marker of resistance in a high genomic scarring burden context may improve the performance of any companion diagnostic for PARP inhibitors.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin.

              Mutations in breast cancer tumor susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, predispose women to early onset breast cancer and other malignancies. The Brca genes are involved in multiple cellular processes in response to DNA damage including checkpoint activation, gene transcription, and DNA repair. Biochemical interaction with the recombinational repair protein Rad51 (Scully, R., Chen, J., Ochs, R. L., Keegan, K., Hoekstra, M., Feunteun, J., and Livingston, D. M. (1997) Cell 90, 425-435), as well as genetic evidence (Moynahan, M. E., Chiu, J. W., Koller, B. H., and Jasin, M. (1999) Mol. Cell 4, 511-518 and Snouwaert, J. N., Gowen, L. C., Latour, A. M., Mohn, A. R., Xiao, A., DiBiase, L., and Koller, B. H. (1999) Oncogene 18, 7900-7907), demonstrates that Brca1 is involved in recombinational repair of DNA double strand breaks. Using isogenic Brca1(+/+) and brca1(-/-) mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell lines, we investigated the role of Brca1 in the cellular response to two different categories of DNA damage: x-ray induced damage and cross-linking damage caused by the chemotherapeutic agent, cisplatinum. Immunoflourescence studies with normal and brca1(-/-) mutant mouse ES cell lines indicate that Brca1 promotes assembly of subnuclear Rad51 foci following both types of DNA damage. These foci are likely to be oligomeric complexes of Rad51 engaged in repair of DNA lesions or in processes that allow cells to tolerate such lesions during DNA replication. Clonogenic assays show that brca1(-/-) mutants are 5-fold more sensitive to cisplatinum compared with wild-type cells. Our studies suggest that Brca1 contributes to damage repair and/or tolerance by promoting assembly of Rad51. This function appears to be shared with Brca2.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Oncol
                Ann. Oncol
                annonc
                Annals of Oncology
                Oxford University Press
                0923-7534
                1569-8041
                May 2018
                04 April 2018
                04 April 2018
                : 29
                : 5
                : 1203-1210
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Experimental Therapeutics Group
                [2 ]High Risk and Familial Cancer, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
                [3 ]Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
                [4 ]Oncogenetics Group
                [5 ]Growth Factors Laboratory, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge
                [7 ]AstraZeneca, Gatehouse Park, Waltham, USA
                [8 ]DNA Damage Response Biology Area, Oncology iMed, AstraZeneca, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK
                [9 ]Division of Molecular Pathology and Cancer Genomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [10 ]Cancer Genomics Group
                [11 ]Molecular Oncology Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
                [12 ]Department of Radiology
                [13 ]Breast Surgical Unit, Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
                [14 ]Gynecological Malignancies Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain
                [15 ]Department of Oncology and Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
                [16 ]Cambridge Breast Unit, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and Cambridge Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
                [17 ]Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program (HOPP)
                [18 ]Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
                [19 ]Breast Cancer and Melanoma Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
                [20 ]Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid
                [21 ]Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona
                [22 ]Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Building M, Campus UAB, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès)
                [23 ]Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Barcelona
                [24 ]CIBERONC, Barcelona
                [25 ]Clinical and Molecular Genetics Area, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
                [26 ]DNA Damage Response Biology Area, Oncology Innovative Medicine and Early Development Biotech Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr Violeta Serra, Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Carrer Natzaret 115-117, 08035 Barcelona, Spain. Tel: +34-93-2543450; E-mail: vserra@ 123456vhio.net

                J. Balmaña and V. Serra authors contributed equally as senior authors.

                Article
                mdy099
                10.1093/annonc/mdy099
                5961353
                29635390
                24414600-5ac7-4e12-9103-b92c65e8b1af
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                Page count
                Pages: 8
                Funding
                Funded by: FEDER 10.13039/501100002924
                Award ID: FIS PI17/01080
                Award ID: PI12-02606
                Award ID: PI15-00355
                Award ID: PI13/01711
                Funded by: NIH 10.13039/100000002
                Award ID: P30CA008748
                Funded by: Breast Cancer Research Foundation 10.13039/100001006
                Funded by: Geoffrey Beene Cancer Research Center 10.13039/100009859
                Funded by: Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria 10.13039/501100005142
                Funded by: BBVA 10.13039/501100005142
                Funded by: ISCIII 10.13039/501100004587
                Award ID: CP14/00228 and CP10/00617
                Funded by: Cancer Research UK 10.13039/501100000289
                Award ID: EU H2020
                Categories
                Original Articles
                Breast Tumors

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                germline brca,parp inhibitor resistance,homologous recombination,rad51,tp53bp1,atm

                Comments

                Comment on this article