34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanical Distribution and New Bone Regeneration After Implanting 3D Printed Prostheses for Repairing Metaphyseal Bone Defects: A Finite Element Analysis and Prospective Clinical Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Critical metaphyseal bone defects caused by nonunion and osteomyelitis are intractable to repair in clinical practice owing to the rigorous demanding of structure and performance. Compared with traditional treatment methods, 3D printing of customized porous titanium alloy prostheses offer feasible and safe opportunities in repairing such bone defects. Yet, so far, no standard guidelines for optimal 3D printed prostheses design and fixation mode have been proposed to further promote prosthesis stability as well as ensure the continuous growth of new bone. In this study, we used a finite element analysis (FEA) to explore the biomechanical distribution and observed new bone regeneration in clinical practice after implanting 3D printed prostheses for repairing metaphyseal bone defects. The results reflected that different fixation modes could result in diverse prosthesis mechanical conductions. If an intramedullary (IM) nail was applied, the stress mainly conducted equally along the nail instead of bone and prosthesis structure. While the stress would transfer more to the lateral bone and prosthesis’s body when the printed wing and screws are selected to accomplish fixation. All these fixation modes could guarantee the initial and long-term stability of the implanted prosthesis, but new bone regenerated with varying degrees under special biomechanical environments. The fixation mode of IM nail was more conducive to new bone regeneration and remodeling, which conformed to the Wolff’s law. Nevertheless, when the prosthesis was fixed by screws alone, no dense new callus could be observed. This fixation mode was optional for defects extremely close to the articular surface. In conclusion, our innovative study could provide valuable references for the fixation mode selection of 3D printed prosthesis to repair metaphyseal bone defect.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Strategies for large bone defect reconstruction after trauma, infections or tumour excision: a comprehensive review of the literature

            Large bone defects resulting from musculoskeletal tumours, infections, or trauma are often unable to heal spontaneously. The challenge for surgeons is to avoid amputation, and provide the best functional outcomes. Allograft, vascularized fibular or iliac graft, hybrid graft, extracorporeal devitalized autograft, distraction osteogenesis, induced-membrane technique, and segmental prostheses are the most common surgical strategies to manage large bone defects. Given its optimal osteogenesis, osteoinduction, osteoconduction, and histocompatibility properties, along with the lower the risk of immunological rejection, autologous graft represents the most common used strategy for reconstruction of bone defects. However, the choice of the best surgical technique is still debated, and no consensus has been reached. The present study investigated the current reconstructive strategies for large bone defect after trauma, infections, or tumour excision, discussed advantages and disadvantages of each technique, debated available techniques and materials, and evaluated complications and new perspectives.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Biomechanical behaviours of the bone–implant interface: a review

              In recent decades, cementless implants have been widely used in clinical practice to replace missing organs, to replace damaged or missing bone tissue or to restore joint functionality. However, there remain risks of failure which may have dramatic consequences. The success of an implant depends on its stability, which is determined by the biomechanical properties of the bone–implant interface (BII). The aim of this review article is to provide more insight on the current state of the art concerning the evolution of the biomechanical properties of the BII as a function of the implant's environment. The main characteristics of the BII and the determinants of implant stability are first introduced. Then, the different mechanical methods that have been employed to derive the macroscopic properties of the BII will be described. The experimental multi-modality approaches used to determine the microscopic biomechanical properties of periprosthetic newly formed bone tissue are also reviewed. Eventually, the influence of the implant's properties, in terms of both surface properties and biomaterials, is investigated. A better understanding of the phenomena occurring at the BII will lead to (i) medical devices that help surgeons to determine an implant's stability and (ii) an improvement in the quality of implants.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                03 June 2022
                2022
                : 10
                : 921545
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Department of Orthopaedics , Peking University Third Hospital , Beijing, China
                [2] 2 Engineering Research Center of Bone and Joint Precision Medicine , Ministry of Education , Peking University Third Hospital , Beijing, China
                [3] 3 School of Materials Science and Engineering , Peking University , Beijing, China
                [4] 4 Department of Mechanical Engineering , Tsinghua University , Beijing, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: He Liu, Jilin University, China

                Reviewed by: Hua Chen, Fourth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, China

                Junlin Yang, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, China

                *Correspondence: Peng Wen, wenpeng@ 123456tsinghua.edu.cn ; Yun Tian, tiany@ 123456bjmu.edu.cn
                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Biomaterials, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                921545
                10.3389/fbioe.2022.921545
                9204204
                35721863
                240c7510-da95-4c44-b139-fe25d8b9276f
                Copyright © 2022 Liu, Li, Qiu, Liu, Zhou, Zheng, Wen and Tian.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 April 2022
                : 17 May 2022
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Original Research

                3d printing technology,finite element analysis,metaphyseal bone defect,new bone regeneration,clinical study

                Comments

                Comment on this article