8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Bruxism: An umbrella review of systematic reviews

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both

            The number of published systematic reviews of studies of healthcare interventions has increased rapidly and these are used extensively for clinical and policy decisions. Systematic reviews are subject to a range of biases and increasingly include non-randomised studies of interventions. It is important that users can distinguish high quality reviews. Many instruments have been designed to evaluate different aspects of reviews, but there are few comprehensive critical appraisal instruments. AMSTAR was developed to evaluate systematic reviews of randomised trials. In this paper, we report on the updating of AMSTAR and its adaptation to enable more detailed assessment of systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. With moves to base more decisions on real world observational evidence we believe that AMSTAR 2 will assist decision makers in the identification of high quality systematic reviews, including those based on non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Journal of Oral Rehabilitation
                J Oral Rehabil
                Wiley
                0305-182X
                1365-2842
                May 07 2019
                May 07 2019
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Dentistry, Brazilian Centre for Evidence‐Based Research Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) Florianópolis Santa Catarina Brazil
                [2 ]Department of Dentistry, Bauru School of Dentistry University of São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
                [3 ]Department of Oral Rehabilitation Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv Israel
                [4 ]Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada
                Article
                10.1111/joor.12801
                30993738
                2397611f-8191-4d5f-9710-206679a11913
                © 2019

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Quantitative & Systems biology,Biophysics
                Quantitative & Systems biology, Biophysics

                Comments

                Comment on this article