0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anisotropy, Anatomical Region, and Additional Variables Influence Young's Modulus of Bone: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          The importance of finite element analysis (FEA) is growing in orthopedic research, especially in implant design. However, Young's modulus ( E) values, one of the most fundamental parameters, can range across a wide scale. Therefore, our study aimed to identify factors influencing E values in human bone specimens. We report our systematic review and meta‐analysis based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. We conducted the analysis on November 21, 2021. We included studies investigating healthy human bone specimens and reported on E values regarding demographic data, specimen characteristics, and measurement specifics. In addition, we included study types reporting individual specimen measurements. From the acquired data, we created a cohort in which we performed an exploratory data analysis that included the explanatory variables selected by random forest and regression trees methods, and the comparison of groups using independent samples Welch's t test. A total of 756 entries were included from 48 articles. Eleven different bones of the human body were included in these articles. The range of E values is between 0.008 and 33.7 GPa. The E values were most heavily influenced by the cortical or cancellous type of bone tested. Measuring method (compression, tension, bending, and nanoindentation), the anatomical region within a bone, the position of the bone within the skeleton, and the bone specimen size had a decreasing impact on the E values. Bone anisotropy, specimen condition, patient age, and sex were selected as important variables considering the value of E. On the basis of our results, E values of a bone change with bone characteristics, measurement techniques, and demographic variables. Therefore, the evaluation of FEA should be performed after the standardization of in vitro measurement protocol. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references93

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kocsisgyorgy@hotmail.com
                Journal
                JBMR Plus
                JBMR Plus
                10.1002/(ISSN)2473-4039
                JBM4
                JBMR Plus
                John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Hoboken, USA )
                2473-4039
                31 October 2023
                December 2023
                : 7
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/jbm4.v7.12 )
                : e10835
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Orthopaedics Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
                [ 2 ] Centre for Translational Medicine Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
                [ 3 ] Institute for Translational Medicine, Szentágothai Research Centre, Medical School University of Pécs Pécs Hungary
                [ 4 ] Division of Pancreatic Diseases, Heart and Vascular Center Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
                [ 5 ] Department of Biophysics and Radiation Biology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary
                [ 6 ] Department of Biostatistics University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest Hungary
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Address correspondence to: György Kocsis, MD, PhD, HU‐1182, Budapest, Üllői út 78/A, Hungary. E‐mail: kocsisgyorgy@ 123456hotmail.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5645-9692
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-4632
                Article
                JBM410835
                10.1002/jbm4.10835
                10731124
                38130752
                235129e1-7798-45ab-87ce-7e76e97ff6f4
                © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 09 August 2023
                : 29 April 2023
                : 25 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 3, Pages: 13, Words: 9127
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                December 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.6 mode:remove_FC converted:20.12.2023

                bone elasticity,bone modeling,finite element analysis,implant research,young's modulus

                Comments

                Comment on this article