12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Evaluation of different methods of transoral minimally invasive surgery for supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and objectives

          To analyze oncological and functional results of transoral minimally invasive surgery (TMIS) for supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma (SGLC), and investigate independent prognostic factors.

          Methods

          Seventy SGLC patients treated with TMIS were included. The overall survival (OS), recurrence‐free survival (RFS), and postoperative functions were analyzed.

          Results

          Sixty‐two patients were early‐stage (Tis, T1, and T2) and eight patients were T3. Eleven patients received preoperative induction chemotherapy (IC). Sixty patients received transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), and 10 patients received transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Fifty‐eight patients were scored Grade‐1 by water swallow test, and 49 patients were scored Grade 0 by grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain. The 1, 3, and 5 year OS of all were 95.450%, 84.877%, and 78.026%, and RFS were 89.167%, 78.052%, and 75.451% respectively. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed N stage and clinical stage were associated with OS, smoking, clinical stage, surgical margins, and Ki‐67 index were associated with RFS. There were no significant differences in preoperative IC or direct surgery, TLM, or TORS. Cox analyses showed smoking and surgical margins were independent prognosis factors for RFS.

          Conclusions

          The positive margin, Ki‐67 index ≥40% and P53(+)&Ki‐67 index ≥40% are worse factors affecting recurrence for SGLC patients. Both smoking and surgical margins are independent prognostic factors affecting recurrence.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries

          This article provides an update on the global cancer burden using the GLOBOCAN 2020 estimates of cancer incidence and mortality produced by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Worldwide, an estimated 19.3 million new cancer cases (18.1 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths (9.9 million excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer) occurred in 2020. Female breast cancer has surpassed lung cancer as the most commonly diagnosed cancer, with an estimated 2.3 million new cases (11.7%), followed by lung (11.4%), colorectal (10.0 %), prostate (7.3%), and stomach (5.6%) cancers. Lung cancer remained the leading cause of cancer death, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths (18%), followed by colorectal (9.4%), liver (8.3%), stomach (7.7%), and female breast (6.9%) cancers. Overall incidence was from 2-fold to 3-fold higher in transitioned versus transitioning countries for both sexes, whereas mortality varied <2-fold for men and little for women. Death rates for female breast and cervical cancers, however, were considerably higher in transitioning versus transitioned countries (15.0 vs 12.8 per 100,000 and 12.4 vs 5.2 per 100,000, respectively). The global cancer burden is expected to be 28.4 million cases in 2040, a 47% rise from 2020, with a larger increase in transitioning (64% to 95%) versus transitioned (32% to 56%) countries due to demographic changes, although this may be further exacerbated by increasing risk factors associated with globalization and a growing economy. Efforts to build a sustainable infrastructure for the dissemination of cancer prevention measures and provision of cancer care in transitioning countries is critical for global cancer control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            An update on larynx cancer.

            Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Laryngeal cancer remains one of the most common tumors of the respiratory tract. Fortunately, significant advancements have been made over the past decade in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Although surgery has been the historical mainstay for localized disease and still is an integral part of treatment, nonsurgical options like radiation and systemic therapy have emerged as viable options. In addition, in the metastatic setting, novel agents are showing promise for this patient population. The care for patients with laryngeal cancer continues to evolve and truly requires a multidisciplinary team-based approach. Unique morbidities, such as loss of natural voice, respiration, and airway protection during swallowing, are observed with this disease and require special consideration. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:31-50. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins.

              Our objective was to determine the safety, feasibility, and the adequacy of surgical margins for transoral robotic surgery (TORS), by reviewing the early results from independent institutional review board-approved clinical trials in three separate institutions. Pooled Data from Independent Prospective Clinical Trials. One hundred ninety-two patients were initially screened, but inadequate exposure did not permit TORS in 13 (6.7%). For two additional patients, TORS was begun but intraoperatively converted to an open procedure. Thus, the intent-to-treat population was 177 patients (average age, 59 years; 81% male), predominantly comprised of tumors arising in the oropharynx (139, 78%) and larynx (26, 15%). TORS was performed for 161 (91%) patients with malignant disease: 153 (95%) with squamous cell carcinoma (T1 [50, 32.7%], T2 [74, 48.4%], T3 [21, 13.7%], T4 [8, 5.2%]), six patients (3.72%) with salivary gland tumors, and two patients with carcinoma in situ. The average follow-up was 345 days. There was no intraoperative mortality or death in the immediate postoperative period. Average estimated blood loss was 83 mL; no patient required transfusion. The rate of positive margins was 4.3%. Twenty-nine patients (16%) experienced 34 serious adverse events that required hospitalization or intervention (grade 3) or were considered life threatening (grade 4, 2.3%). Tracheostomy was performed in 12.4% of all patients (22/177), but only 2.3% had a tracheostomy at last follow-up. For all patients undergoing TORS without previous therapy, the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy dependency rate was 5.0%. The average hospital stay was 4.2 days. Based on this multicenter study, TORS appears to be safe, feasible, and as such play an important role in the multidisciplinary management of head and neck cancer. Copyright © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                fangjugao2@ccmu.edu.cn
                ruwang1989@126.com
                Journal
                Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
                Cancer Rep (Hoboken)
                10.1002/(ISSN)2573-8348
                CNR2
                Cancer Reports
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2573-8348
                08 August 2024
                August 2024
                : 7
                : 8 ( doiID: 10.1002/cnr2.v7.8 )
                : e2077
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing People's Republic of China
                [ 2 ] Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Capital Medical University Beijing People's Republic of China
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jugao Fang and Ru Wang, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University 8, Chong wen men nei Street, Dongcheng District Beijing, People's Republic of China.

                Email: fangjugao2@ 123456ccmu.edu.cn and ruwang1989@ 123456126.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0326-6296
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1372-7228
                Article
                CNR22077
                10.1002/cnr2.2077
                11310094
                39118227
                220d21a9-905d-4b42-b0cd-ee162ebdf4f0
                © 2024 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 23 March 2024
                : 14 October 2023
                : 15 April 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Pages: 8, Words: 4700
                Funding
                Funded by: Capital Health Research and Development of Special
                Award ID: 2022‐1‐2051
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China , doi 10.13039/501100001809;
                Award ID: 82002880
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                August 2024
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.6 mode:remove_FC converted:09.08.2024

                laryngeal function,prognosis,recurrence,supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma,transoral minimally invasive surgery,transoral robotic surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content760

                Most referenced authors356