1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Geographic variation in compliance with Australian colorectal cancer screening programs: the role of attitudinal and cognitive traits.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients in regional and rural areas tend to be diagnosed at a more advanced stage than metropolitan patients and have poorer 5-year survival rates. Environmental and cultural factors in non-metropolitan areas often facilitate a more reactive approach to health care, which can result in lower participation in preventative health measures such as screening for early signs of cancer. Individual differences in attitudes and cognitive styles can also act as barriers to cancer screening. Currently, evidence regarding geographical disparity in CRC screening is inconclusive and based largely on test return in nationwide screening programs as opposed to compliance with program guidelines. This study investigates the effect of attitudinal and cognitive traits on compliance with, as opposed to participation in, population CRC screening programs in rural, regional and metropolitan environments.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Rural Remote Health
          Rural and remote health
          Rural and Remote Health
          1445-6354
          1445-6354
          July 2019
          : 19
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Qld, Australia belinda.goodwin@usq.edu.au.
          [2 ] Institute for Resilient Regions and School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Qld, Australia sonja.march@usq.edu.au.
          [3 ] Institute for Resilient Regions and School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Qld, Australia michael.ireland@usq.edu.au.
          [4 ] Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Qld, Australia fiona.crawford-williams@usq.edu.au.
          [5 ] School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Qld, Australia u1090926@umail.usq.edu.au.
          [6 ] School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield Central, Qld, Australia martelle3@hotmail.com.
          [7 ] Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Qld, Australia; Cancer Research Centre, Cancer Council Queensland, Fortitude Valley, Qld, Australia; and School of Medicine, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia jeff.dunn@usq.edu.au.
          Article
          4957
          10.22605/RRH4957
          31340653
          211b628c-6394-4086-bbc6-611bea1a1973
          History

          cancer screening, healthcare disparity, Australia, colorectal cancer, compliance,attitudes, participation rates

          Comments

          Comment on this article