2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Additive protective effects of sacubitril/valsartan and bosentan on vascular remodelling in experimental pulmonary hypertension

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          Although right ventricular (RV) function is an important determinant of morbidity and mortality in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), there is no treatment targeting directly the RV. We evaluate the efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ 696) as add-on therapy to bosentan in rats with severe pulmonary hypertension (PH).

          Methods and results

          Combination therapy of LCZ 696 and bosentan has additive vascular protective effects against the pulmonary vascular remodelling and PH in two preclinical models of severe PH. Compared with monotherapy, co-treatment of LCZ 696 (30 or 68 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, per os) and bosentan (100 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, per os) started 7 days after monocrotaline (MCT) injection substantially reduces pulmonary pressures, vascular remodelling, and RV hypertrophy and fibrosis in rats. Consistent with these observations, co-treatment of rats with established PH induced by sugen/hypoxia (SuHx) with LCZ 696 (30 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks, per os) and bosentan (100 mg/kg/day for 3 weeks, per os) started 5 weeks after Sugen injection partially attenuate total pulmonary vascular resistance and cardiovascular structures. We also obtained evidence showing that LCZ 696 has anti-proliferative effect on cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells derived from patients with idiopathic PAH, an effect that is more pronounced in presence of bosentan. Finally, we found that the plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) are higher in rats co-treated with LCZ 696 (30 mg/kg/day) and bosentan (100 mg/kg/day) than in MCT and SuHx rats treated with vehicle.

          Conclusion

          Dual therapy with LCZ 696 plus bosentan proved significantly superior beneficial effect to LCZ 696 or bosentan alone on vascular remodelling and severity of experimental PH.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          (View ORCID Profile)
          Journal
          Cardiovascular Research
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0008-6363
          1755-3245
          May 01 2021
          April 23 2021
          July 11 2020
          May 01 2021
          April 23 2021
          July 11 2020
          : 117
          : 5
          : 1391-1401
          Affiliations
          [1 ]INSERM, UMR_S 999 «Pulmonary Hypertension: Pathophysiology and Novel Therapies», Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, 92350, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
          [2 ]Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Pharmacie, 92290, Châtenay-Malabry, France
          [3 ]Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Service de Pharmacie, Hôpital Bicêtre, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
          [4 ]Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
          [5 ]Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Service pharmacie, 92350, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
          [6 ]AP-HP, Laboratoire de biochimie, Hôpital Bicêtre, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
          [7 ]AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Hôpital Bicêtre, 94270, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
          Article
          10.1093/cvr/cvaa200
          32653925
          20c8ae27-d88c-4ecf-a798-f16b82f81723
          © 2020

          https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article