For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
Inviting an author to review:
Olfactory Receptors in Non-Chemosensory Organs: The Nervous System in Health and Disease
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
41
views
Article has an altmetric score of 1
52
references
 Top references
cited by
2
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      254
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Analysis of the impact of social insurance on farmers in China: A study exploring subjective perceptions of well-being and the mechanisms of common prosperity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Exploring common prosperity in China, this study focuses on the impact of social pension insurance on the well-being of rural communities. It explores the direct beneficiaries and policy effects of the Rural Social Pension Insurance system (RSPI), which was piloted in 2009 and achieved full coverage in 2012. It summarizes the performance and implementation of social pension insurance and the development of the rural social pension system.

          Methods

          The article uses microdata from the four most recent periods of China Family Panel Studies (CFPS), which were undertaken in 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018, and uses the Order Probit model to analyze the effects of participating in insurance on rural residents in terms of their subjective well-being. The study identifies diverse effects on farmers from different age groups, genders, and regions, with a focus on subjective well-being. The article also tests the mediating effects of health status and self-rated social status on farmers’ subjective well-being and their mechanisms of action.

          Results

          Findings reveal that participating in the insurance system significantly improved the subjective well-being of rural residents. Its biggest beneficiaries were groups of rural residents with poor health status, living in good overall conditions. Taking into account the most recent aims of this policy, to promote rural revitalization and common prosperity, further optimization of the rural pension insurance system should improve the living standards of low-income groups, enabling more comprehensive coverage, and potentially helping to mitigate the risk of returning to poverty due to illness.

          Conclusion

          Developments in basic social security and the rural basic pension system could effectively guarantee the basic standards of living of rural residents. Future development of the system should take into account the heterogeneous characteristics of rural residents and implement social pension protection policies in accordance with local conditions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references52

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Income and well-being: an empirical analysis of the comparison income effect

          Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell (2005)
          Article 0 comments Cited 253 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
          Article has an altmetric score of 37
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all?

            Richard Easterlin (1995)
            Article 0 comments Cited 136 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Article has an altmetric score of 115
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The sampling design of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS)

              Yu Xie, Ping Y Lu (2015)
              The China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) is an on-going, nearly nationwide, comprehensive, longitudinal social survey that is intended to serve research needs on a large variety of social phenomena in contemporary China. In this paper, we describe the sampling design of the CFPS sample for its 2010 baseline survey and methods for constructing weights to adjust for sampling design and survey nonresponses. Specifically, the CFPS used a multi-stage probability strategy to reduce operation costs and implicit stratification to increase efficiency. Respondents were oversampled in five provinces or administrative equivalents for regional comparisons. We provide operation details for both sampling and weights construction.
              Article 0 comments Cited 102 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Article has an altmetric score of 1
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): Front Psychol
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Front Psychol
                Journal ID (publisher-id): Front. Psychol.
                Title: Frontiers in Psychology
                Publisher: Frontiers Media S.A.
                ISSN (Electronic): 1664-1078
                Publication date (Electronic): 08 December 2022
                Publication date Collection: 2022
                Volume: 13
                Electronic Location Identifier: 1004581
                Affiliations
                [1] 1School of Business, Fuyang Normal University , Fuyang, Anhui, China
                [2] 2Academy of Strategies for Innovation and Development, Anhui University , Hefei, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Petia Genkova, Osnabrück University of Applied Sciences, Germany

                Reviewed by: Simon Grima, University of Malta, Malta; Valentina Vasile, Valentina Vasile, Romania; Marcela Parada-Contzen, University of Concepcion, Chile

                *Correspondence: Yongsheng Cheng, chengyongsheng@ 123456aliyun.com

                This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1004581
                PMC ID: 9775275
                PubMed ID: 36571053
                SO-VID: 206df21d-5b87-4143-b76c-19cd08496d44
                Copyright © Copyright © 2022 Cheng and Zhang.
                License:

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                Date received : 27 July 2022
                Date accepted : 31 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 7, Equations: 5, References: 53, Pages: 16, Words: 11019
                Categories
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Original Research

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Keywords: new rural social pension insurance,rural residents,subjective well-being,mediation effect,cfps
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                Keywords: new rural social pension insurance, rural residents, subjective well-being, mediation effect, cfps

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content254

                See all similar

                Cited by2

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors190

                See all reference authors