7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Oral contraceptives vs injectable progestin in their effect on sexual behavior.

      American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Adult, Cohort Studies, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, administration & dosage, Estradiol, blood, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Injections, Intramuscular, Linear Models, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Multivariate Analysis, Progestins, Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, drug effects, Statistics, Nonparametric, Testosterone, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We sought to compare sexual function and hormone concentrations in combined oral contraceptive (COC) and injectable progestin users. Sexually active COC and depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) users completed the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) questionnaire, a demographic data form, and had serum testosterone and estradiol levels measured. Multiple linear regression was used to measure associations of interest. Among 50 subjects enrolled, COC users had lower levels of free testosterone compared to DMPA users (0.2 vs 0.6 pg/mL; P < .0001) and higher levels of estradiol (75.8 vs 62.8 pg/mL; P = .0057), but scores of desire (4.2 vs 3.8; P = .27), scores of arousal (5.0 vs 4.8; P = .46), or total scores (30.1 vs 28.8; P = .28) were no different. Demographic characteristics were similar except for ethnicity, level of education, gravidity, parity, and frequency of intercourse. In multivariate analysis, birth control type was not significantly associated with desire score or total FSFI score. While users of COC and DMPA have significantly different sex hormone levels, they are not different in sexual function as measured by the FSFI. Copyright © 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article