11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Seizure detection with reduced electroencephalogram channels: research trends and outlook

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Epilepsy is a prevalent condition characterized by recurrent, unpredictable seizures. Monitoring with surface electroencephalography (EEG) is the gold standard for diagnosing epilepsy, but a time-consuming, uncomfortable and sometimes ineffective process for patients. Further, using EEG over a brief monitoring period has variable success, dependent on patient tolerance and seizure frequency. The availability of hospital resources and hardware and software specifications inherently restrict the options for comfortable, long-term data collection, resulting in limited data for training machine-learning models. This mini-review examines the current patient journey, providing an overview of the current state of EEG monitoring with reduced electrodes and automated channel reduction methods. Opportunities for improving data reliability through multi-modal data fusion are suggested. We assert the need for further research in electrode reduction to advance brain monitoring solutions towards portable, reliable devices that simultaneously offer patient comfort, perform ultra-long-term monitoring and expedite the diagnosis process.

          Related collections

          Most cited references108

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Spin Diffusion Measurements: Spin Echoes in the Presence of a Time-Dependent Field Gradient

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces

            Brain-computer interfaces (BCI) enable direct communication with a computer, using neural activity as the control signal. This neural signal is generally chosen from a variety of well-studied electroencephalogram (EEG) signals. For a given BCI paradigm, feature extractors and classifiers are tailored to the distinct characteristics of its expected EEG control signal, limiting its application to that specific signal. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which have been used in computer vision and speech recognition to perform automatic feature extraction and classification, have successfully been applied to EEG-based BCIs; however, they have mainly been applied to single BCI paradigms and thus it remains unclear how these architectures generalize to other paradigms. Here, we ask if we can design a single CNN architecture to accurately classify EEG signals from different BCI paradigms, while simultaneously being as compact as possible.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems revisited: their validity as relative head-surface-based positioning systems.

              With the advent of multi-channel EEG hardware systems and the concurrent development of topographic and tomographic signal source localization methods, the international 10/20 system, a standard system for electrode positioning with 21 electrodes, was extended to higher density electrode settings such as 10/10 and 10/5 systems, allowing more than 300 electrode positions. However, their effectiveness as relative head-surface-based positioning systems has not been examined. We previously developed a virtual 10/20 measurement algorithm that can analyze any structural MR head and brain image. Extending this method to the virtual 10/10 and 10/5 measurement algorithms, we analyzed the MR images of 17 healthy subjects. The acquired scalp positions of the 10/10 and 10/5 systems were normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) stereotactic coordinates and their spatial variability was assessed. We described and examined the effects of spatial variability due to the selection of positioning systems and landmark placement strategies. As long as a detailed rule for a particular system was provided, it yielded precise landmark positions on the scalp. Moreover, we evaluated the effective spatial resolution of 329 scalp landmark positions of the 10/5 system for multi-subject studies. As long as a detailed rule for landmark setting was provided, 241 scalp positions could be set effectively when there was no overlapping of two neighboring positions. Importantly, 10/10 positions could be well separated on a scalp without overlapping. This study presents a referential framework for establishing the effective spatial resolutions of 10/20, 10/10, and 10/5 systems as relative head-surface-based positioning systems.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society
                2054-5703
                May 3, 2023
                May 2023
                May 3, 2023
                : 10
                : 5
                : 230022
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, The University of Sydney, , Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
                [ 2 ] Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, , Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
                [ 3 ] Translational Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, , Sydney, New South Wales 2050, Australia
                [ 4 ] Sydney Neuroimaging Analysis Centre, , Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
                [ 5 ] Central Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, , Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
                [ 6 ] Translational Research Collective, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, , Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6023-9457
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2753-5553
                Article
                rsos230022
                10.1098/rsos.230022
                10154941
                37153360
                1f21dfdc-43c1-417f-8b0b-c6691b62a314
                © 2023 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : January 7, 2023
                : April 11, 2023
                Categories
                1004
                1001
                26
                133
                Engineering
                Review Articles

                electrode,electroencephalogram,epilepsy,seizure detection,machine learning,patient care

                Comments

                Comment on this article