10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A THEORY OF PRESENTEEISM BEYOND BEING SICK AND A MEASUREMENT TOOL Translated title: Una teoría del presentismo más allá de la enfermedad y una herramienta para su medición Translated title: UMA TEORIA DO PRESENTEÍSMO PARA ALÉM DA DOENÇA E UMA FERRAMENTA PARA SUA MENSURAÇÃO

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          ABSTRACT The first definition of presenteeism was limited to individuals who attended work despite being unwell. Over the past 15 years, other perspectives have expanded the concept to encompass any non-work-related factors influencing behavior during working hours. This research aims to redefine presenteeism within the context of healthcare workers' behaviors and contribute to the literature by introducing a measurement scale. The study involved 431 healthcare professionals across nine public and four private/foundation hospitals. Presenteeism was associated positively with burnout and negatively with happiness at work. Younger people showed higher levels of presenteeism compared to their older counterparts, as did those who worked nine hours or more per day. Although the scale was applied to healthcare professionals, its framework holds potential for use in other areas.

          Translated abstract

          RESUMEN Inicialmente, el término presentismo se aplicaba solamente en los casos de personas que iban a trabajar incluso estando enfermas. Sin embargo, en los últimos años, surgieron otras perspectivas que argumentan que también debe considerarse presentismo todo tema que no necesariamente esté relacionado con la actividad laboral, pero que afecte el desempeño del trabajador o implique alguna acción durante la jornada laboral . Esta investigación tiene como objetivo redefinir el presentismo en el ámbito del comportamiento de los trabajadores de la salud y contribuir a la literatura al ofrecer una escala para su medición. El estudio se realizó con 431 profesionales de la salud de 9 hospitales públicos y 4 privados/fundaciones. El presentismo se asoció positivamente con el agotamiento y negativamente con la felicidad en el trabajo. Las personas más jóvenes mostraron comportamientos de presentismo más altos que las personas mayores y las que trabajaban 9 horas o más al día. Esta escala, que se aplicó a profesionales de la salud, tiene un diseño estructural que permite que se aplique a otras áreas.

          Translated abstract

          RESUMO Quando o presenteísmo foi introduzido, tratava-se de uma questão limitada ao fato das pessoas irem trabalhar mesmo doentes. Nos últimos anos, no entanto, surgiram outras perspectivas, defendendo que também deve ser considerado presenteísmo todo assunto que não esteja necessariamente relacionado à atividade laboral, mas que possa ter efeito sobre o desempenho do trabalhador ou incorra em alguma ação durante o horário de trabalho. A presente pesquisa tem como objetivo redefinir o conceito de presenteísmo no âmbito dos comportamentos dos trabalhadores da área da saúde e contribuir para a literatura, oferecendo uma escala para sua mensuração. O estudo foi realizado com 431 profissionais de saúde em nove hospitais públicos e quatro hospitais privados/fundacionais. O presenteísmo foi associado positivamente ao esgotamento profissional e negativamente com a felicidade no trabalho. Pessoas mais jovens mostraram comportamentos de presenteísmo mais elevados do que as pessoas mais velhas e do que aquelas que trabalhavam nove horas ou mais por dia. A escala foi aplicada a profissionais de saúde, mas apresenta um desenho estrutural que pode ser aplicado em outras áreas.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.

          Scale developers often provide evidence of content validity by computing a content validity index (CVI), using ratings of item relevance by content experts. We analyzed how nurse researchers have defined and calculated the CVI, and found considerable consistency for item-level CVIs (I-CVIs). However, there are two alternative, but unacknowledged, methods of computing the scale-level index (S-CVI). One method requires universal agreement among experts, but a less conservative method averages the item-level CVIs. Using backward inference with a purposive sample of scale development studies, we found that both methods are being used by nurse researchers, although it was not always possible to infer the calculation method. The two approaches can lead to different values, making it risky to draw conclusions about content validity. Scale developers should indicate which method was used to provide readers with interpretable content validity information. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures

              Background Implementation outcome measures are essential for monitoring and evaluating the success of implementation efforts. Yet, currently available measures lack conceptual clarity and have largely unknown reliability and validity. This study developed and psychometrically assessed three new measures: the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM). Methods Thirty-six implementation scientists and 27 mental health professionals assigned 31 items to the constructs and rated their confidence in their assignments. The Wilcoxon one-sample signed rank test was used to assess substantive and discriminant content validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) and Cronbach alphas were used to assess the validity of the conceptual model. Three hundred twenty-six mental health counselors read one of six randomly assigned vignettes depicting a therapist contemplating adopting an evidence-based practice (EBP). Participants used 15 items to rate the therapist’s perceptions of the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of adopting the EBP. CFA and Cronbach alphas were used to refine the scales, assess structural validity, and assess reliability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess known-groups validity. Finally, half of the counselors were randomly assigned to receive the same vignette and the other half the opposite vignette; and all were asked to re-rate acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility. Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess test-retest reliability and linear regression to assess sensitivity to change. Results All but five items exhibited substantive and discriminant content validity. A trimmed CFA with five items per construct exhibited acceptable model fit (CFI = 0.98, RMSEA = 0.08) and high factor loadings (0.79 to 0.94). The alphas for 5-item scales were between 0.87 and 0.89. Scale refinement based on measure-specific CFAs and Cronbach alphas using vignette data produced 4-item scales (α’s from 0.85 to 0.91). A three-factor CFA exhibited acceptable fit (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.08) and high factor loadings (0.75 to 0.89), indicating structural validity. ANOVA showed significant main effects, indicating known-groups validity. Test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.73 to 0.88. Regression analysis indicated each measure was sensitive to change in both directions. Conclusions The AIM, IAM, and FIM demonstrate promising psychometric properties. Predictive validity assessment is planned. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                rae
                Revista de Administração de Empresas
                Rev. adm. empres.
                Fundação Getulio Vargas, Escola de Administração de Empresas de S.Paulo (São Paulo, SP, Brazil )
                0034-7590
                2178-938X
                2024
                : 64
                : 2
                : e2023-0081
                Affiliations
                [2] Istambul orgnameIstanbul University-Cerrahpaşa orgdiv1Department of Health Management Türkiye ssoyuk@ 123456iuc.edu.tr
                [1] Istambul orgnameIstanbul Arel University orgdiv1Department of Health Management Turkey salimyilmaz142@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S0034-75902024000200303 S0034-7590(24)06400200303
                10.1590/s0034-759020240205
                1eb433b5-eb70-42e1-9f29-698918d0f1bb

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 03 March 2023
                : 21 November 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 0
                Product

                SciELO Brazil

                Categories
                Articles

                reliability,Presentismo,trabajadores de la salud,análisis psicométricos,validez,fiabilidad,Presenteísmo,trabalhadores da saúde,análises psicométricas,validade,confiabilidade,presenteeism,healthcare workers,psychometric analyses,validity

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content425

                Most referenced authors1,165