There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
To evaluate the validity and reliability of an objective scoring system, the Post-Anesthetic
Discharge Scoring System (PADSS), which was compared against existing Clinical Discharge
Criteria in the ambulatory surgery unit of our hospital.
randomized, open study.
Ambulatory surgery unit at a university teaching hospital.
247 ambulatory surgery patients undergoing general anesthesia.
One hour after the operation, the initial assessment using PADSS and the Clinical
Discharge Criteria was made by an independent observer. Evaluations were repeated
at 30-minute intervals until patients obtained a Post-Anesthetic Discharge Score of
at least 9 and fulfilled the Clinical Discharge Criteria.
There was a close correlation between the end of anesthesia to time patients were
fit for discharge using either PADSS or the Clinical Discharge Criteria (Pearson's
Correlation Coefficient r = 0.89). The internal consistency reliability of PADSS (alpha
= 0.65) was superior to that of the Clinical Discharge Criteria (alpha = 0.14).
We have found PADSS to have superior measurement scaling and diagnostic properties.