13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A systematic review of the international prevalence of BRCA mutation in breast cancer

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A systematic review was conducted, summarizing international BRCA 1 or 2 ( BRCA1/2) mutation prevalence in breast cancer. Databases (eg, Medline and Embase; N=7) and conferences were searched (January 2012 to December 2017). From 17,872 records, 70 studies were included. In 58 large (N>100) studies, BRCA1/2 mutation prevalence varied widely from 1.8% (Spain) in sporadic breast cancer to 36.9% (United States) in estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor low+ (1–9% on immunohistochemistry/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative [HER2-]) breast cancer. In 2 large studies unselected for family history, ethnicity, sex, or age and no/unclear selection by breast cancer stage or hormone receptor (HR) status, germline BRCA (g BRCA) mutation prevalence was 2.9% (Italy) to 3.0% (South Korea). In the 4 large unselected triple-negative breast cancer studies, g BRCA mutation prevalence varied from 9.3% (Australia) to 15.4% (United States). g BRCA mutation prevalence in 1 large unselected HR positive/HER2- early breast cancer study was 5% (United States). In 2 large unselected metastatic breast cancer studies, g BRCA mutation prevalence was 2.7% (France) and 4.3% (Germany). Locally advanced breast cancer studies were small and not in unselected populations. Poor reporting of g BRCA status and basis of selection implies a need for further large well-reported BRCA mutation prevalence studies in breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the maintenance of genomic stability.

          The BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are important in maintaining genomic stability by promoting efficient and precise repair of double-strand breaks. The main role of BRCA2 appears to involve regulating the function of RAD51 in the repair by homologous recombination. BRCA1 has a broader role upstream of BRCA2, participating in various cellular processes in response to DNA damage. The DNA repair defect associated with mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 could be exploited to develop new targeted therapeutic approaches for cancer occurring in mutation carriers.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients

            Genetic testing for cancer risk has expanded rapidly. We examined clinical genetic testing and results among population-based patients with breast and ovarian cancer. The study included all women 20 years of age or older diagnosed with breast or ovarian cancer in California and Georgia between 2013 and 2014 and reported to the SEER registries covering the entire state populations. SEER data were linked to results from four laboratories that performed nearly all germline cancer genetic testing. Testing use and results were analyzed at the gene level. There were 77,085 patients with breast cancer and 6,001 with ovarian cancer. Nearly one quarter of those with breast cancer (24.1%) and one third of those with ovarian cancer (30.9%) had genetic test results. Among patients with ovarian cancer, testing was lower in blacks (21.6%; 95% CI, 18.1% to 25.4%; v whites, 33.8%; 95% CI, 32.3% to 35.3%) and uninsured patients (20.8%; 95% CI, 15.5% to 26.9%; v insured patients, 35.3%; 95% CI, 33.8% to 36.9%). Prevalent pathogenic variants in patients with breast cancer were BRCA1 (3.2%), BRCA2 (3.1%), CHEK 2 (1.6%), PALB2 (1.0%), ATM (0.7%), and NBN (0.4%); in patients with ovarian cancer, prevalent pathogenic variants were BRCA1 (8.7%), BRCA2 (5.8%), CHEK2 (1.4%), BRIP1 (0.9%), MSH2 (0.8%), and ATM (0.6%). Racial/ethnic differences in pathogenic variants included BRCA1 (ovarian cancer: whites, 7.2%; 95% CI, 5.9% to 8.8%; v Hispanics, 16.1%; 95% CI, 11.8% to 21.2%) and CHEK2 (breast cancer: whites, 2.3%; 95% CI, 1.8% to 2.8%; v blacks, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0% to 0.8%). When tested for all genes that current guidelines designate as associated with their cancer type, 7.8% of patients with breast cancer and 14.5% of patients with ovarian cancer had pathogenic variants. Clinically-tested patients with breast and ovarian cancer in two large, diverse states had 8% to 15% prevalence of actionable pathogenic variants. Substantial testing gaps and disparities among patients with ovarian cancer are targets for improvement.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prevalence of BRCA mutations among women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in a genetic counseling cohort.

              Revised NCCN guidelines recommend that women ≤60 years with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) be referred for consideration of genetic counseling. Small, homogeneous samples have limited evaluation of BRCA mutation prevalence among different ethnicities affected by TNBC subtype. We sought to determine whether the prevalence of BRCA mutations within a TNBC cohort differs by demographic factors. We performed a retrospective review of patients with TNBC referred for genetic counseling at two academic Hereditary Cancer Clinics between 2000 and 2012. Demographic data were collected, including age at diagnosis and race/ethnicity. Race was categorized as African American (AA), Ashkenazi Jewish (AJ), Asian, Caucasian, Hispanic, or other. Primary outcome was BRCA mutation status, analyzed by race/ethnicity and age at diagnosis. A total of 469 patients with TNBC who underwent testing for BRCA genetic mutations were identified, of which 450 patients had evaluable BRCA testing results; 139 (30.8 %) had confirmed BRCA1 (n = 106) or BRCA2 (n = 32) mutations. BRCA mutation prevalence differed by ethnicity and race: AA (20.4 %), AJ (50 %), Asian (28.5 %), Caucasian (33.3 %), and Hispanic (20 %). The prevalence of genetic mutations also differed by age at diagnosis: 70 years (16.6 %). The prevalence of genetic mutations among women with TNBC referred for genetic counseling is high and differs significantly by ethnicity/race and age. This data helps to refine mutation risk estimates among women with TNBC, allowing for more personalized genetic counseling potentially aiding in improved patient decision-making.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Epidemiol
                Clin Epidemiol
                CLEP
                Clinical Epidemiology
                Dove
                1179-1349
                11 July 2019
                2019
                : 11
                : 543-561
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Health Economics, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd ., York YO19 6FD, UK
                [2 ] Systematic Reviews, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd ., York YO19 6FD, UK
                [3 ] Information, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd ., York YO19 6FD, UK
                [4 ] Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Pfizer Inc ., San Francisco, CA 94105, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Nigel ArmstrongKleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd ., Unit 6, Escrick Business Park, Riccall Road, Escrick, YorkYO19 6FD, UKTel +44 190 472 7993Fax +44 190 472 0429Email nigel@ 123456systematic-reviews.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-4798
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1177-416X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-8455
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-2078
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9602-3239
                Article
                206949
                10.2147/CLEP.S206949
                6628947
                31372057
                1c0fdc19-6ba9-4dc4-9991-ec31a1c85c2c
                © 2019 Armstrong et al.

                This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms ( https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).

                History
                : 27 February 2019
                : 23 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, References: 87, Pages: 19
                Categories
                Review

                Public health
                brca1,brca2,prevalence,systematic review,chemotherapy
                Public health
                brca1, brca2, prevalence, systematic review, chemotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article