43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integration of molecular cytogenetics, dated molecular phylogeny, and model-based predictions to understand the extreme chromosome reorganization in the Neotropical genus Tonatia (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Defining factors that contributed to the fixation of a high number of underdominant chromosomal rearrangements is a complex task because not only molecular mechanisms must be considered, but also the uniqueness of natural history attributes of each taxon. Ideally, detailed investigation of the chromosome architecture of an organism and related groups, placed within a phylogenetic context, is required. We used multiple approaches to investigate the dynamics of chromosomal evolution in lineages of bats with considerable karyotypic variation, focusing on the different facets contributing to fixation of the exceptional chromosomal changes in Tonatia saurophila. Integration of empirical data with proposed models of chromosome evolution was performed to understand the probable conditions for Tonatia’s karyotypic evolution.

          Results

          The trajectory of reorganization of chromosome blocks since the common ancestor of Glossophaginae and Phyllostominae subfamilies suggests that multiple tandem fusions, as well as disruption and fusions of conserved phyllostomid chromosomes were major drivers of karyotypic reshuffling in Tonatia. Considerable variation in the rates of chromosomal evolution between phyllostomid lineages was observed. Thirty–nine unique fusions and fission events reached fixation in Tonatia over a short period of time, followed by ~12 million years of chromosomal stasis. Physical mapping of repetitive DNA revealed an unusual accumulation of LINE-1 sequences on centromeric regions, probably associated with the chromosomal dynamics of this genus.

          Conclusions

          Multiple rearrangements have reached fixation in a wave-like fashion in phyllostomid bats. Different biological features of Tonatia support distinct models of rearrangement fixation, and it is unlikely that the fixations were a result of solely stochastic processes in small ancient populations. Increased recombination rates were probably facilitated by expansion of repetitive DNA, reinforced by aspects of taxon reproduction and ecology.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0494-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Further analysts of the data by akaike' s information criterion and the finite corrections

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation.

            We study the evolution of inversions that capture locally adapted alleles when two populations are exchanging migrants or hybridizing. By suppressing recombination between the loci, a new inversion can spread. Neither drift nor coadaptation between the alleles (epistasis) is needed, so this local adaptation mechanism may apply to a broader range of genetic and demographic situations than alternative hypotheses that have been widely discussed. The mechanism can explain many features observed in inversion systems. It will drive an inversion to high frequency if there is no countervailing force, which could explain fixed differences observed between populations and species. An inversion can be stabilized at an intermediate frequency if it also happens to capture one or more deleterious recessive mutations, which could explain polymorphisms that are common in some species. This polymorphism can cycle in frequency with the changing selective advantage of the locally favored alleles. The mechanism can establish underdominant inversions that decrease heterokaryotype fitness by several percent if the cause of fitness loss is structural, while if the cause is genic there is no limit to the strength of underdominance that can result. The mechanism is expected to cause loci responsible for adaptive species-specific differences to map to inversions, as seen in recent QTL studies. We discuss data that support the hypothesis, review other mechanisms for inversion evolution, and suggest possible tests.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The conditioned reconstructed process.

              We investigate a neutral model for speciation and extinction, the constant rate birth-death process. The process is conditioned to have n extant species today, we look at the tree distribution of the reconstructed trees--i.e. the trees without the extinct species. Whereas the tree shape distribution is well-known and actually the same as under the pure birth process, no analytic results for the speciation times were known. We provide the distribution for the speciation times and calculate the expectations analytically. This characterizes the reconstructed trees completely. We will show how the results can be used to date phylogenies.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                cibele.caio@gmail.com
                marianne.volleth@med.ovgu.de
                federico.g.hoffmann@gmail.com
                lscott@uidaho.edu
                hwichman@uidaho.edu
                fy1@sanger.ac.uk
                robert.baker@ttu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Evol Biol
                BMC Evol. Biol
                BMC Evolutionary Biology
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2148
                6 October 2015
                6 October 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 220
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX USA
                [ ]Department of Human Genetics, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
                [ ]Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi, MS USA
                [ ]Institute for Genomics, Biocomputing and Biotechnology, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS USA
                [ ]Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID USA
                [ ]The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
                Article
                494
                10.1186/s12862-015-0494-y
                4594642
                1b6e0b05-fc56-4531-9b1f-01f504fa0059
                © Sotero-Caio et al. 2015

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 14 June 2015
                : 22 September 2015
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Evolutionary Biology
                chromosome evolution,chromosomal mutation,karyotypic megaevolution,phyllostomidae,centromere,transposable element

                Comments

                Comment on this article