3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The most relevant standard of success in IVF has been discussed widely. An optimal standard should reflect both the risk aspects and the effectiveness of the treatment. The most important parameter for the couple is the ultimate cumulative delivery rate per started cycle. Even if the long-term follow-up of the treatment cycles is difficult in practice, we would stress that more emphasis should be given to embryo freezing, in order to maximize the efficiency of the IVF/ICSI cycles. The contribution of embryo cryopreservation in elective single embryo transfer cycle programmes may result in a cumulative delivery rate of >50%. In Finland, the implementation of single embryo transfer has been possible with good cryopreservation programmes. The effect of this strategy has been seen in a decrease in the proportion of twin deliveries after assisted reproduction, being 13.9% for 2002, as well as a reduction of the proportion of multiple births in the nationwide Medical Birth Registry.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Hum. Reprod.
          Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
          Oxford University Press (OUP)
          0268-1161
          0268-1161
          Nov 2004
          : 19
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital and STAKES National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland. aila.tiitinen@hus.fi
          Article
          deh446
          10.1093/humrep/deh446
          15319392
          1b242593-ea05-4edb-911c-a1754759bf3c
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article