10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      On the methodological and epistemological power of epistemic (de)centering as a reflexive praxis of resistance toward disability justice

      Qualitative Research Journal
      Emerald

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Leveraging autoethnography and conceptual syntheses, the author stake the claim that supporting people to empower themselves in the naming and description of their lived realities beyond assumed incompleteness constitutes a resistant form of critical praxis the author name as epistemic (de)centering. Through these engagements of varying proximity with the other, meaning those Lives-Hopes-Dreams often outside researchers' personal and professional standpoints, the author aims to argue that critical, reflexive praxes where historically marginalized people, including those living/surviving/thriving with impairments-disabilities, can be afforded place, space, time and respect to visibilize their experiences.

          Design/methodology/approach

          In this paper, the author dreams of radical possibilities afforded by epistemic disobedience to value those Body-Mind-Spirits often elided among social justice work. Interrogating nuances among pieces in a recently published special issue named as “Disability Justice,” the author rearticulates a reality of possibility where the rhetoric that sustains invisibilizations of disabled people via racial-capitalist-ableist-coloniality is disrupted to explicitly position these identities as valuable to inform how to transform society in more just ways.

          Findings

          Analyses from this work further conversations on disabled subjectivities, post-oppositional logics of centers-margins, and resistant knowledge projects to illuminate how to approach the questions of who gets to decide when justice is achieved, and how abled Body-Mind-Spirits can meet their commitments to justice, especially among those that work in social justice circles.

          Originality/value

          Infusing across this work the voices of multiply marginalized, and disabled, folks provides a cognitive-systemic architecture where research moves from “what if” as abstraction to engage with “how to” center disability justice in education (DJE). In doing so, this research pushes our approaches to social justice praxis, in education and beyond, to think about our individual and collective proximities to self and other, and more specifically disabled Lives-Hopes-Dreams.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Epistemic Disobedience, Independent Thought and Decolonial Freedom

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Intersectionality as critical social theory

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Qualitative Research Journal
                QRJ
                Emerald
                1443-9883
                September 20 2022
                January 04 2023
                September 20 2022
                January 04 2023
                : 23
                : 1
                : 114-129
                Article
                10.1108/QRJ-05-2022-0072
                17565556-aa4a-4674-9aa1-54698cccd8d0
                © 2023

                https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article