13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Variation in hospital admission in febrile children evaluated at the Emergency Department (ED) in Europe: PERFORM, a multicentre prospective observational study

      research-article
      1 , * , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 3 , 15 , 8 , 2 , 16 , 3 , 17 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 7 , 20 , 15 , 3 , 1 , on behalf of PERFORM consortium: Personalised Risk assessment in febrile children to optimise Real-life Management across the European Union
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Hospitalisation is frequently used as a marker of disease severity in observational Emergency Department (ED) studies. The comparison of ED admission rates is complex in potentially being influenced by the characteristics of the region, ED, physician and patient. We aimed to study variation in ED admission rates of febrile children, to assess whether variation could be explained by disease severity and to identify patient groups with large variation, in order to use this to reduce unnecessary health care utilization that is often due to practice variation.

          Design

          MOFICHE (Management and Outcome of Fever in children in Europe, part of the PERFORM study, www.perform2020.org), is a prospective cohort study using routinely collected data on febrile children regarding patient characteristics (age, referral, vital signs and clinical alarming signs), diagnostic tests, therapy, diagnosis and hospital admission.

          Setting and participants

          Data were collected on febrile children aged 0–18 years presenting to 12 European EDs (2017–2018).

          Main outcome measures

          We compared admission rates between EDs by using standardised admission rates after adjusting for patient characteristics and initiated tests at the ED, where standardised rates >1 demonstrate higher admission rates than expected and rates <1 indicate lower rates than expected based on the ED patient population.

          Results

          We included 38,120 children. Of those, 9.695 (25.4%) were admitted to a general ward (range EDs 5.1–54.5%). Adjusted standardised admission rates ranged between 0.6 and 1.5. The largest variation was seen in short admission rates (0.1–5.0), PICU admission rates (0.2–2.2), upper respiratory tract infections (0.4–1.7) and fever without focus (0.5–2.7). Variation was small in sepsis/meningitis (0.9–1.1).

          Conclusions

          Large variation exists in admission rates of febrile children evaluated at European EDs, however, this variation is largely reduced after correcting for patient characteristics and therefore overall admission rates seem to adequately reflect disease severity or a potential for a severe disease course. However, for certain patient groups variation remains high even after adjusting for patient characteristics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnostic Test Accuracy of a 2-Transcript Host RNA Signature for Discriminating Bacterial vs Viral Infection in Febrile Children.

          Because clinical features do not reliably distinguish bacterial from viral infection, many children worldwide receive unnecessary antibiotic treatment, while bacterial infection is missed in others.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Mortality and morbidity in community-acquired sepsis in European pediatric intensive care units: a prospective cohort study from the European Childhood Life-threatening Infectious Disease Study (EUCLIDS)

            Background Sepsis is one of the main reasons for non-elective admission to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but little is known about determinants influencing outcome. We characterized children admitted with community-acquired sepsis to European PICUs and studied risk factors for mortality and disability. Methods Data were collected within the collaborative Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)-funded EUCLIDS study, which is a prospective multicenter cohort study aiming to evaluate genetic determinants of susceptibility and/or severity in sepsis. This report includes 795 children admitted with community-acquired sepsis to 52 PICUs from seven European countries between July 2012 and January 2016. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital death. Secondary outcome measures were PICU-free days censured at day 28, hospital length of stay, and disability. Independent predictors were identified by multivariate regression analysis. Results Patients most commonly presented clinically with sepsis without a source (n = 278, 35%), meningitis/encephalitis (n = 182, 23%), or pneumonia (n = 149, 19%). Of 428 (54%) patients with confirmed bacterial infection, Neisseria meningitidis (n = 131, 31%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 78, 18%) were the main pathogens. Mortality was 6% (51/795), increasing to 10% in the presence of septic shock (45/466). Of the survivors, 31% were discharged with disability, including 24% of previously healthy children who survived with disability. Mortality and disability were independently associated with S. pneumoniae infections (mortality OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.1–16.0, P = 0.04; disability OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.8–15.8, P < 0.01) and illness severity as measured by Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM2) score (mortality OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.3–6.1, P < 0.01; disability OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.8–6.4, P < 0.001). Conclusions Despite widespread immunization campaigns, invasive bacterial disease remains responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality in critically ill children in high-income countries. Almost one third of sepsis survivors admitted to the PICU were discharged with some disability. More research is required to delineate the long-term outcome of pediatric sepsis and to identify interventional targets. Our findings emphasize the importance of improved early sepsis-recognition programs to address the high burden of disease. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2052-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Medical problems presenting to paediatric emergency departments: 10 years on.

              To describe the common medical presenting problems of children attending a paediatric emergency department (ED) compared with 10 years previously. A retrospective review of electronic patient record and comparison with previous cohort. A UK university hospital ED. A cohort of children and young people aged 0-15 years who attended the ED between 7 February 2007 and 6 February 2008 (n=39 394) compared with a historical cohort from 10 years earlier. Information on presenting problem, demographic data and source of referral were collected. Presenting problems were ranked and comparisons made with previous data using the difference between proportions analysis and the significance test for a difference in two proportions. A total of 39 394 children (57% boys) were seen with 14 724 medical attendances compared with 10 369 attendances from the 1997 cohort, an increase of 42%. Most (85%) ED attendances can be accounted for by the 10 most common presenting problems, including breathing difficulty (2494, 20.1%), febrile illness (1752, 14.1%), diarrhoea with or without vomiting (1731, 14.0%), rash (1066, 8.6%) and cough (835, 6.7%). Similar proportions are described to a decade earlier; however, there were fewer patients attending with breathing difficulty (-10.9%, p<0.001). Over a 10-year period, there has been a rise in the number of people attending the ED with medical conditions. The 10 most common presenting problems account for 85% of medical attendees. These results suggest the increasing utilisation of ED services for children with common medical presenting problems and should inform further research exploring the pathways for attendance and the thresholds in seeking medical advice in order to inform the commissioning of paediatric emergency and urgent care services.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                7 January 2021
                2021
                : 16
                : 1
                : e0244810
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of General Paediatrics, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [2 ] Genetics, Vaccines, Infections and Pediatrics Research Group (GENVIP), Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
                [3 ] Section of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom
                [4 ] Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Dr. von Hauner Children's Hospital, University Hospital, Ludwig, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität (LMU), München, Germany
                [5 ] Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [6 ] Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
                [7 ] Faculty of Tropical and Infectious Disease, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
                [8 ] Great North Children’s Hospital, Paediatric Immunology, Infectious Diseases & Allergy, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [9 ] Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [10 ] NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Based at Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust and Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [11 ] Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [12 ] Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Amalia Children’s Hospital, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [13 ] Department of Laboratory Medicine, Section Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Medical Immunology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [14 ] Stichting Katholieke Universiteit, Radboudumc Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [15 ] Department of General Paediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
                [16 ] Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [17 ] Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Univerzitetni Klinični Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [18 ] Second Department of Paediatrics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, P. and A. Kyriakou Children’s Hospital, Athens, Greece
                [19 ] Department Pediatric Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [20 ] Department of Pediatrics, Rīgas Stradiņa Universitāte, Children Clinical University Hospital, Riga, Latvia
                Kaohsuing Medical University Hospital, TAIWAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                ‡ These authors also contributed equally to this work.

                ¶ Membership of the PERFORM Consortium is provided in S1 Acknowledgments.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2437-0757
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9237-4904
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3678-9264
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-8550
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-1071
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2822-3527
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-581X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9671-8161
                Article
                PONE-D-20-27296
                10.1371/journal.pone.0244810
                7790386
                33411810
                16e5521b-4dc4-4d72-9c67-2b5f8697aa11
                © 2021 Borensztajn et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 31 August 2020
                : 16 December 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 7, Pages: 14
                Funding
                Funded by: Horizon 2020 ()
                Award ID: 668303
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Institute for Health Research (GB)
                Award ID: CL-2018-21-007
                Award Recipient :
                This project was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme to ML (Grant No. 668303), the NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre at Newcastle Hospitals NHS foundation trust to ME, and the National Institute for Health Research to RGN (CL-2018-21-007). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Hospitals
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Children
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Children
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Clinical Medicine
                Signs and Symptoms
                Fevers
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Conditions
                Infectious Diseases
                Pediatric Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pediatrics
                Pediatric Infections
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Physicians
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Physicians
                Custom metadata
                An anonymized data set necessary to replicate our study findings will be provided as a public repository with a DOI in case of acceptance of our manuscript.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content145

                Cited by8

                Most referenced authors667