9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perinatal Derivatives: Where Do We Stand? A Roadmap of the Human Placenta and Consensus for Tissue and Cell Nomenclature

      review-article
      1 , * , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 12 , 4 , 13 , 14 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 3 , 16 , 1 , 17 , 18 , 13 , 14 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 6 , 6 , 4 , 17 , 23
      Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      perinatal, derivatives, tissues, placenta, fetal annexes, cells, consensus nomenclature

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Progress in the understanding of the biology of perinatal tissues has contributed to the breakthrough revelation of the therapeutic effects of perinatal derivatives (PnD), namely birth-associated tissues, cells, and secreted factors. The significant knowledge acquired in the past two decades, along with the increasing interest in perinatal derivatives, fuels an urgent need for the precise identification of PnD and the establishment of updated consensus criteria policies for their characterization. The aim of this review is not to go into detail on preclinical or clinical trials, but rather we address specific issues that are relevant for the definition/characterization of perinatal cells, starting from an understanding of the development of the human placenta, its structure, and the different cell populations that can be isolated from the different perinatal tissues. We describe where the cells are located within the placenta and their cell morphology and phenotype. We also propose nomenclature for the cell populations and derivatives discussed herein. This review is a joint effort from the COST SPRINT Action (CA17116), which broadly aims at approaching consensus for different aspects of PnD research, such as providing inputs for future standards for the processing and in vitro characterization and clinical application of PnD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references256

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement.

          The considerable therapeutic potential of human multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) has generated markedly increasing interest in a wide variety of biomedical disciplines. However, investigators report studies of MSC using different methods of isolation and expansion, and different approaches to characterizing the cells. Thus it is increasingly difficult to compare and contrast study outcomes, which hinders progress in the field. To begin to address this issue, the Mesenchymal and Tissue Stem Cell Committee of the International Society for Cellular Therapy proposes minimal criteria to define human MSC. First, MSC must be plastic-adherent when maintained in standard culture conditions. Second, MSC must express CD105, CD73 and CD90, and lack expression of CD45, CD34, CD14 or CD11b, CD79alpha or CD19 and HLA-DR surface molecules. Third, MSC must differentiate to osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts in vitro. While these criteria will probably require modification as new knowledge unfolds, we believe this minimal set of standard criteria will foster a more uniform characterization of MSC and facilitate the exchange of data among investigators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal–fetal interface in humans

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Concise review: the surface markers and identity of human mesenchymal stem cells.

              The concept of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is becoming increasingly obscure due to the recent findings of heterogeneous populations with different levels of stemness within MSCs isolated by traditional plastic adherence. MSCs were originally identified in bone marrow and later detected in many other tissues. Currently, no cloning based on single surface marker is capable of isolating cells that satisfy the minimal criteria of MSCs from various tissue environments. Markers that associate with the stemness of MSCs await to be elucidated. A number of candidate MSC surface markers or markers possibly related to their stemness have been brought forward so far, including Stro-1, SSEA-4, CD271, and CD146, yet there is a large difference in their expression in various sources of MSCs. The exact identity of MSCs in vivo is not yet clear, although reports have suggested they may have a fibroblastic or pericytic origin. In this review, we revisit the reported expression of surface molecules in MSCs from various sources, aiming to assess their potential as MSC markers and define the critical panel for future investigation. We also discuss the relationship of MSCs to fibroblasts and pericytes in an attempt to shed light on their identity in vivo. © 2014 AlphaMed Press.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/282134/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/128889/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/456176/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/216899/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1104916/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1157225/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1138780/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/215019/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/498308/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/176506/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1016238/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1053672/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/780438/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1158232/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/212569/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/684244/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/138882/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1101230/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1138849/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1056000/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1098351/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/68043/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/171789/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/740121/overview
                URI : http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/172359/overview
                Journal
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front Bioeng Biotechnol
                Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.
                Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-4185
                17 December 2020
                2020
                : 8
                : 610544
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Centro di Ricerca E. Menni, Fondazione Poliambulanza-Istituto Ospedaliero , Brescia, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Medicine and Ageing Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara , Chieti, Italy
                [3] 3StemTeCh Group, G. d’Annunzio Foundation, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara , Chieti, Italy
                [4] 4Division of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Gottfried Schatz Research Center, Medical University of Graz , Graz, Austria
                [5] 5Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, Unit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                [6] 6Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, AUVA Research Center, Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration , Vienna, Austria
                [7] 7Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry, Life Sciences Center, Vilnius University , Vilnius, Lithuania
                [8] 8Systems Biology Ireland, School of Medicine, University College Dublin , Dublin, Ireland
                [9] 9Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen , Essen, Germany
                [10] 10Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen , Essen, Germany
                [11] 11Shenzhen Engineering Laboratory of Orthopaedic Regenerative Technologies, Department of Spine Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital , Shenzhen, China
                [12] 12Institute of Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana , Ljubljana, Slovenia
                [13] 13Instituto de Biopatología y Medicina Regenerativa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica, Universidad de Granada , Granada, Spain
                [14] 14Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular III e Inmunología, Universidad de Granada , Granada, Spain
                [15] 15Unidad de Gestión Clínica Laboratorios, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio , Granada, Spain
                [16] 16Vascular and Stem Cell Biology, Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, CAST (Center for Advanced Studies and Technology, ex CeSI-MeT) , Chieti, Italy
                [17] 17Department of Life Science and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
                [18] 18Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine Lab, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, Fondazione Istituto di Ricerca Pediatrica Città della Speranza , Padua, Italy
                [19] 19The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta” , Cluj-Napoca, Romania
                [20] 20Department of Morphological Sciences-Histology, Iuliu Haţieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy , Cluj-Napoca, Romania
                [21] 21Department of Pathology, IMOGEN Research Center , Cluj-Napoca, Romania
                [22] 22Department of General and Experimental Pathology with Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CEPT), Medical University of Warsaw , Warsaw, Poland
                [23] 23Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli” IRCCS , Rome, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Martijn van Griensven, Maastricht University, Netherlands

                Reviewed by: Diana Farmer, University of California System, United States; Aijun Wang, University of California, Davis, United States

                *Correspondence: Antonietta Rosa Silini, antonietta.silini@ 123456poliambulanza.it

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                This article was submitted to Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

                Article
                10.3389/fbioe.2020.610544
                7773933
                33392174
                166292b1-4220-47fe-82d2-dd5641b37dae
                Copyright © 2020 Silini, Di Pietro, Lang-Olip, Alviano, Banerjee, Basile, Borutinskaite, Eissner, Gellhaus, Giebel, Huang, Janev, Kreft, Kupper, Abadía-Molina, Olivares, Pandolfi, Papait, Pozzobon, Ruiz-Ruiz, Soritau, Susman, Szukiewicz, Weidinger, Wolbank, Huppertz and Parolini.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 26 September 2020
                : 23 November 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 10, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 256, Pages: 33, Words: 0
                Categories
                Bioengineering and Biotechnology
                Review

                perinatal,derivatives,tissues,placenta,fetal annexes,cells,consensus nomenclature

                Comments

                Comment on this article