3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of the arrangement of cavitation generation unit on the performance of an advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • Effects of CGU arrangement on ARHCR performance are studied by CFD.

          • The “simplified flow field” strategy was utilized.

          • Lower intersection angle and number of rows are benefit to performance.

          • Proper radial and circumferential offsets and radial spacing are advisable.

          • This work may provide a reference value to the design of ARHCRs.

          Abstract

          Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) is widely considered a promising process intensification technology. The novel advanced rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactors (ARHCRs), with considerably higher performance compared with traditional devices, have gained increasing attention of academic and industrial communities. The cavitation generation unit (CGU), located on the rotor and/or stator of an ARHCR, is utilized to generate cavitation and consequently, its geometrical structure is vital for the performance. The present work studied, for the first time, the effect of the arrangement of CGU on the performance of a representative ARHCR by employing computational fluid dynamics based on the “simplified flow field” strategy. The effect of CGU arrangement, which was neglected in the past, was evaluated: radial offset distance ( c), intersection angle ( ω), number of rows ( N), circumferential offset angle ( γ), and radial spacing ( r). The results indicate that the CGU, with an arrangement of a low ω and moderate c, N, γ, and r, performed the highest cavitation efficiency. The corresponding reasons were analyzed by combining the flow field and cavitation pattern. Moreover, the results also exposed a weakness of the “simplified flow field” strategy which may induce the unfavorable “sidewall effect” and cause false high-pressure region. The findings of this work may provide a reference value to the design of ARHCRs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found
          Is Open Access

          Effects of cavitation on different microorganisms: The current understanding of the mechanisms taking place behind the phenomenon. A review and proposals for further research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Hydrodynamic cavitation as a promising route for wastewater treatment – A review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A review on hydrodynamic cavitation disinfection: The current state of knowledge

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Ultrason Sonochem
                Ultrason Sonochem
                Ultrasonics Sonochemistry
                Elsevier
                1350-4177
                1873-2828
                29 July 2023
                October 2023
                29 July 2023
                : 99
                : 106544
                Affiliations
                [a ]Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
                [b ]National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China
                [c ]Key Laboratory of Fluid Transmission Technology of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
                [d ]Petroleum and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Brunei, Bandar Seri Begawan BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
                [e ]College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
                [f ]Shandong Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
                [g ]Department of Mechanical Engineering, BK21 FOUR ERICA-ACE Center, Hanyang University, Ansan 15588, Republic of Korea
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Key Laboratory of High Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of Ministry of Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China. xunsun@ 123456sdu.edu.cn
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally.

                Article
                S1350-4177(23)00256-0 106544
                10.1016/j.ultsonch.2023.106544
                10432248
                37544171
                15b0341e-4b93-4d96-89de-08190e9d8965
                © 2023 The Author(s)

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 6 March 2023
                : 24 July 2023
                : 28 July 2023
                Categories
                Original Research Article

                process intensification,hydrodynamic cavitation,hydrodynamic cavitation reactor,arrangement of cgu,computational fluid dynamics

                Comments

                Comment on this article