0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exercise training and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies with emphasis on potential moderators

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was (1) to determine exercise effects on bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women and (2) to address the corresponding implication of bone and menopausal status or supervision in postmenopausal women. A comprehensive search of eight electronic databases according to the PRISMA statement up to August 9, 2022, included controlled exercise trials ≥ 6 months. BMD changes (standardized mean differences: SMD) at the lumbar spine (LS), femoral neck (FN), and total hip (TH) were considered as outcomes. Study group comparisons were conducted for osteopenia/osteoporosis versus normal BMD, early versus late postmenopausal women, and predominantly supervised versus predominantly non-supervised study arms. We applied an inverse heterogeneity (IVhet) model. In summary, 80 studies involving 94 training and 80 control groups with a pooled number of 5581 participants were eligible. The IVhet model determined SMDs of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.16–0.42), 0.27 (95% CI: 0.16–0.39), and 0.41 (95% CI: 0.30–0.52) for LS, FN, and THBMD, respectively. Heterogeneity between the trial results varied from low ( I 2 = 20%, TH BMD) to substantial ( I 2 = 68%, LS-BMD). Evidence for publication bias/small study effects was negligibly low (FN-, TH-BMD) to high (LSBMD). We observed no significant differences ( p > .09) for exercise effects on LS-, FN-, or TH-BMD-LS between studies/study arms with or without osteopenia/osteoporosis, early versus late postmenopausal women, or predominantly supervised versus non-supervised exercise programs. Using robust statistical methods, the present work provides further evidence for a positive effect of exercise on BMD in postmenopausal women. Differences in bone status (osteopenia/osteoporosis versus normal bone), menopausal status (early versus late postmenopausal), and supervision (yes versus no) did not significantly affect the exercise effects on BMD at LS or proximal femur.

          Related collections

          Most cited references138

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

          The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

              Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wolfgang.kemmler@imp.uni-erlangen.de
                Journal
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporos Int
                Osteoporosis International
                Springer London (London )
                0937-941X
                1433-2965
                7 February 2023
                7 February 2023
                2023
                : 34
                : 7
                : 1145-1178
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.5330.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2107 3311, Institute of Medical Physics, , Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, ; Erlangen, Germany
                [2 ]GRID grid.411544.1, ISNI 0000 0001 0196 8249, Department Population‐Based Medicine, Institute of Health Science, , University Hospital Tübingen, ; Tübingen, Germany
                [3 ]GRID grid.21051.37, ISNI 0000 0001 0601 6589, Department of Medical and Life Sciences, , University of Furtwangen, ; Schwenningen, Germany
                [4 ]GRID grid.411668.c, ISNI 0000 0000 9935 6525, Institute of Radiology, University Hospital Erlangen, ; Erlangen, Germany
                [5 ]GRID grid.8379.5, ISNI 0000 0001 1958 8658, Bernhard-Heine-Centrum Für Bewegungsforschung, University of Würzburg, ; Würzburg, Germany
                [6 ]Austrian Society for Bone and Mineral Research, Vienna, Austria
                [7 ]German Society for Physical and Rehabilitative Medicine, Dresden, Germany
                [8 ]German Association for Health-Related Fitness and Exercise Therapy (DVGS), Hürth-Efferen, Germany
                [9 ]Osteology Umbrella Association Germany, Austria, Switzerland
                [10 ]Frankfurt Center of Bone Health, Frankfurt, Germany
                [11 ]Research Group On Guideline “Exercise and Fracture Prevention, Frankfurt, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-0669
                Article
                6682
                10.1007/s00198-023-06682-1
                10282053
                36749350
                151be501-1900-4367-8cee-8bcc3ba1dd04
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 17 November 2022
                : 20 January 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (1041)
                Categories
                Review
                Custom metadata
                © International Osteoporosis Foundation and Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation 2023

                Orthopedics
                bone strength,exercise trials,menopause,older women,osteoporosis,supervision
                Orthopedics
                bone strength, exercise trials, menopause, older women, osteoporosis, supervision

                Comments

                Comment on this article