76
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Emergency management of fat embolism syndrome

      review-article
      Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
      Medknow Publications
      Brain, clinical criteria, fat emboli, imaging studies, lung

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fat emboli occur in all patients with long-bone fractures, but only few patients develop systemic dysfunction, particularly the triad of skin, brain, and lung dysfunction known as the fat embolism syndrome (FES). Here we review the FES literature under different subheadings.

          The incidence of FES varies from 1–29%. The etiology may be traumatic or, rarely, nontraumatic. Various factors increase the incidence of FES. Mechanical and biochemical theories have been proposed for the pathophysiology of FES. The clinical manifestations include respiratory and cerebral dysfunction and a petechial rash. Diagnosis of FES is difficult. The other causes for the above-mentioned organ dysfunction have to be excluded. The clinical criteria along with imaging studies help in diagnosis. FES can be detected early by continuous pulse oximetry in high-risk patients. Treatment of FES is essentially supportive. Medications, including steroids, heparin, alcohol, and dextran, have been found to be ineffective.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Fat embolism prophylaxis with corticosteroids. A prospective study in high-risk patients.

          The efficacy of corticosteroid treatment in the prophylaxis of the fat embolism syndrome was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study of high-risk patients with long-bone fractures. Using a set of objective diagnostic criteria, we saw a significant difference in the incidence of the syndrome between corticosteroid- (0 of 21) and placebo-treated patients (9 of 41) (p less than 0.05). There were no complications related to corticosteroid treatment. No routine laboratory or physical findings reliably predicted the development of the fat embolism syndrome except petechial rash, which occurred only in 5 placebo-treated patients who developed the syndrome. Complement activation was present in all patients studied who had the syndrome (5 of 27) but also in many patients who did not meet our diagnostic criteria, suggesting a multifactorial cause. These data support the prophylactic value of corticosteroid treatment in patients at high risk for the fat embolism syndrome, particularly if several unfavorable predictors are present.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Fat embolism syndrome. A 10-year review.

            The effect of recent advances in critical care and the emphasis on early fracture fixation in patients with fat embolism syndrome (FES) are unknown. To better define FES in current practice by conducting a 10-year review of the experiences at our level I trauma center. The medical records of all patients in whom FES was diagnosed from July 1, 1985, to July 1, 1995, were reviewed for demographics, injury severity and pattern, diagnostic criteria, and management. A level I trauma center. Twenty-seven patients with clinically apparent FES were identified. This resulted in an incidence of 0.9% of all patients with long-bone fractures. The mean injury severity score was 9.5 (range, 4-22). The diagnosis of FES was made by clinical criteria, including hypoxia, 26 patients (96%); mental status changes, 16 patients (59%); petechiae, 9 patients (33%); temperature higher than 39 degrees C, 19 patients (70%); tachycardia (heart rate > 120 beats per minute), 25 patients (93%); thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150 x 10(9)/L), 10 patients (37%); and unexplained anemia, 18 patients (67%). Thirteen patients (48%) had multiple long-bone fractures, and 14 patients (52%) had a single long-bone fracture. Seven patients (26%) had open fractures, 15 (56%) had closed fractures, and the remaining 5 (18%) had both. Of the total fracture population, the distribution was 81% closed, 15% open, and 4% both. Management included ventilatory support for 12 (44%) of the patients; early operative fixation was emphasized, and 74% of the fractures were stabilized within 24 hours of injury. This was comparable with 76% of the total fracture population. There were 2 deaths, for a mortality of 7%. (1) Fat embolism syndrome remains a diagnosis of exclusion and is based on clinical criteria. (2) Clinically apparent FES is unusual but may be masked by associated injuries in more severely injured patients. (3) No association could be identified between FES and a specific fracture pattern or location. (4) Early intramedullary fixation does not increase the incidence or severity of FES. (5) While FES seems to have a direct effect on survival, the management of FES remains primarily supportive.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Abdominoplasty combined with suction lipoplasty: a study of complications, revisions, and risk factors in 487 cases.

              E Dillerud (1990)
              The records of 487 patients undergoing abdominoplasty combined with closed liposuction of flap and flanks were reviewed regarding complications, revisions, and certain risk factors related to flap necrosis. Six patients developed general nonfatal complications including 1 deep phlebitis and 1 pulmonary embolism. Thirty-nine local complications occurred including 24 cases of flap necrosis, 4 hematomas, 2 dehiscences, 1 abdominal perforation, 1 infection, and 5 cases of seroma. Wide undermining and the "opposite T" incision emerged as significant risk factors related to flap necrosis. Neither the suction procedure nor obesity nor age had significant influence on the slough incidence. Although the present study does not include controls, liposuction does not appear to represent any significant additional risk when performed in connection with abdominoplasty.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Emerg Trauma Shock
                JETS
                Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
                Medknow Publications (India )
                0974-2700
                0974-519X
                Jan-Apr 2009
                : 2
                : 1
                : 29-33
                Affiliations
                Hamad Medical Corporation, P.Box 3050, Doha-Qatar
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Nissar Shaikh, E-mail: nissatfirdous99@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                JETS-02-29
                10.4103/0974-2700.44680
                2700578
                19561953
                14a81e70-c076-422a-8b79-24068c9b6e0a
                © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 August 2008
                : 13 August 2008
                Categories
                Review Article

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                brain,fat emboli,lung,clinical criteria,imaging studies
                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                brain, fat emboli, lung, clinical criteria, imaging studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article