10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Immunoglobulin M bullous pemphigoid: An enigma

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune blistering disease characterized by pruritus, tense blisters and erosions of the skin or mucosae, subepidermal splitting, and linear IgG or complement deposition along the epidermal basement membrane zone (BMZ), directed against the hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 and BP230. 1 Deposition of IgA in conjunction with IgG is regularly found in bullous pemphigoid, whereas deposition of only IgA along the epidermal BMZ is known as linear IgA disease. The presence of only immunoglobulin M (IgM) deposition in pemphigoid has rarely been described and the relevance of IgM in the pathomechanism of autoimmune blistering diseases is still debated. 2 In this case report, we describe a peculiar case involving a patient with bullous pemphigoid clinically, in which exclusively tissue bound and circulating IgM subclass antibodies were present, even after many years of disease activity and follow-up. This case provides more insight toward the possible role of IgM in the pathomechanism of bullous pemphigoid. Case report A healthy 49-year-old woman presented with a 6-year history of spontaneous blisters on the lower extremities, which later extended to her whole body. Pruritus was not present. The patient originated from North Africa, and there were no family members with a similar skin disorder. Physical examination revealed multiple tense bullae on erythematous skin on the left shoulder and neck (Fig 1, A). The lesions healed with hyperpigmentation, without scarring or milia. The buccal mucosa showed purpura and bullae (Fig 1, B). Fig 1 Clinical and immunopathologic findings of a patient with IgM bullous pemphigoid. A, Bullae and vesicles on erythematous skin on the upper body, partly hemorrhagic, with hyperpigmented maculae. B, Mucosal involvement with vesicles and purpura on the buccal mucosa. C, Direct immunofluorescence microscopy of perilesional skin showing linear deposition of IgM in an n-serrated pattern (arrowhead). D, Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on salt-split skin showing a strong staining of IgM along the epidermal side (arrowhead); the artificial subepidermal blister is depicted by an asterisk. Two 4-mm biopsies were taken from perilesional and healthy (nonsun-exposed) skin for direct immunofluorescence microscopy and a blood sample was taken for serologic examination. The biopsies showed a strong linear n-serrated deposition of IgM along the epidermal BMZ together with complement C3, without the presence of IgG or IgA (Fig 1, C). Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on salt-split skin showed a strong epidermal staining (roof) for IgM, whereas IgG and IgA results were negative (Fig 1, D). The immunoblot result for BP180 and BP230 (IgG) was negative. In accordance with the clinical presentation, a diagnosis of IgM bullous pemphigoid was made. In the following years, multiple biopsies and serologic tests were performed, repeatedly showing deposition of complement C3 and IgM subclass antibodies only, without IgA and IgG. Additional laboratory investigation showed no aberrant findings; more specifically, an infection, immunoglobulin deficiency, and IgM monoclonal gammopathy were ruled out. At presentation, the patient had already been treated with high doses of prednisone, azathioprine, minocycline, nicotinamide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, doxycycline, and cyclophosphamide. Because of insufficient result, infusion of human intravenous immunoglobulin was started (50 g intravenously per day during 3 consecutive days per month). For 1 year she received monthly human intravenous immunoglobulin infusions, which resulted in complete remission, but after cessation of the therapy the blisters returned. After this period, she was treated with mycophenolate mofetil (500 mg twice a day) and prednisone (7.5-15 mg/day) for almost a year, which had to be stopped because of the adverse effects of headache, dizziness, and malaise. Consequently, the human intravenous immunoglobulin infusions were restarted, combined with mycophenolate mofetil (500 mg twice a day), and resulted in complete remission within a short period. After treatment for 4 years with human intravenous immunoglobulin infusions, the therapy was changed to rituximab (1000 mg intravenously twice a month). While the patient was being treated with rituximab, new blisters developed. After 5 months, the human intravenous immunoglobulin infusions (50 g intravenously per month) were restarted, and she is currently in remission. Discussion In this case report, we describe a peculiar case involving a patient with bullous pemphigoid, with both complement C3 and tissue bound and circulating IgM subclass antibodies only. Even more unusual is that this patient after years of disease activity and follow-up still demonstrated (circulating) antibodies exclusively from IgM subclass, without any evidence of class switching. The presence of complement C3 supported the diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid because complement is thought to be an important factor in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid by the attraction and activation of inflammatory cells, normally initiated by IgG antibodies. 1 , 3 , 4 Although the reacting antigen could not be proven, because ELISA against BP180 NC16a and BP230 is unsuitable for IgM, we believe this IgM must be directed against one of the hemidesmosomal components and may be responsible for the activation of complement in this patient. The first clue was the n-serrated pattern of the IgM deposition in the biopsy, which corresponded with binding to autoantigens located above the sublamina densa zone. 1 , 5 Second, the epidermal staining (roof) in the indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on salt-split skin also pointed to BP180 and BP230 as the involved antigens. 1 , 6 , 7 A literature search revealed several case reports of patients with IgM epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (Supplemental Table I; available at http://www.jaad.org).8, 9, 10 In our case, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita was ruled out by the absence of scarring and the presence of linear deposition of IgM along the epidermal side in indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on salt-split skin, and because the linear deposition showed an n-serrated pattern. The presence of IgM-only positivity has also been reported in a case with ocular pemphigoid, in which solely the ocular mucosa was involved (Supplemental Table I). 11 However, the presence of an IgM-mediated entity was debated by Velthuis et al. 2 In their article, 25 patients were described with linear staining of IgM along the epidermal BMZ, but because of the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation, the existence of a linear IgM dermatosis was eventually denied. One patient in that cohort was thought to have a form of IgM-mediated bullous pemphigoid and seemed to match the profile of our case, with clinically bullous pemphigoid, linear deposition of IgM and complement C3 along the BMZ, and the presence of circulating IgM and complement C3 against BMZ components. Besides the reported 25 cases by Velthuis et al, 2 other cases with deposition of IgM antibodies at the BMZ have been reported, particularly in pregnant women (Supplemental Table I). Why no immunoglobulin class switching has occurred in our patient with bullous pemphigoid after years of disease activity is unclear because no evidence was found for a monoclonal IgM gammopathy or immunodeficiency. The existence of a cryoglobulinemia or hyper IgM syndrome was ruled out as well. A possible explanation for the persistence of high IgM titers would be that long-lived plasma cells are responsible for the production of the IgM antibodies. This theory is supported by the fact that infusion with rituximab did not result in remission, whereas use of human intravenous immunoglobulin did. 12 , 13 The mechanism of action of human intravenous immunoglobulin is not fully understood, but its therapeutic effect seems to result from a combination of mechanisms, in which B cells are involved. 13 In conclusion, although the pathogenic role of IgM could not be proven, we believe these IgM antibodies must play an important role in the pathogenesis of bullous pemphigoid in this patient.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          BP180 Is Critical in the Autoimmunity of Bullous Pemphigoid

          Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is by far the most common autoimmune blistering dermatosis that mainly occurs in the elderly. The BP180 is a transmembrane glycoprotein, which is highly immunodominant in BP. The structure and location of BP180 indicate that it is a significant autoantigen and plays a key role in blister formation. Autoantibodies from BP patients react with BP180, which leads to its degradation and this has been regarded as the central event in BP pathogenesis. The consequent blister formation involves the activation of complement-dependent or -independent signals, as well as inflammatory pathways induced by BP180/anti-BP180 autoantibody interaction. As a multi-epitope molecule, BP180 can cause dermal–epidermal separation via combining each epitope with specific immunoglobulin, which also facilitates blister formation. In addition, some inflammatory factors can directly deplete BP180, thereby leading to fragility of the dermal–epidermal junction and blister formation. This review summarizes recent investigations on the role of BP180 in BP pathogenesis to determine the potential targets for the treatment of patients with BP.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            U-serrated immunodeposition pattern differentiates type VII collagen targeting bullous diseases from other subepidermal bullous autoimmune diseases.

            Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) can be differentiated from other subepidermal bullous diseases by sophisticated techniques such as immunoelectron microscopy, salt-split skin antigen mapping, fluorescence overlay antigen mapping, immunoblot and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Differentiating anti-lamina lucida and anti-sublamina densa anti-BMZ antibodies by indirect immunofluorescence on 1.0 M sodium chloride-separated skin.

              Sixty-one bullous disease sera containing IgG anti-BMZ antibodies were examined by indirect immunofluorescence on intact skin and skin separated through the lamina lucida by incubation in 1.0 M NaCl. All sera produced an indistinguishable pattern of linear immunofluorescence on intact skin at dilutions of 1:10 or higher. On separated skin, antibodies bound to either the epidermal (epidermal pattern), dermal (dermal pattern), or epidermal and dermal (combined pattern) sides of the separation. The binding patterns were consistent on separated skin from several donors and titers of anti-basement membrane zone antibodies on separated skin were comparable to those on intact skin. Sera from 3 patients with herpes gestationis (HG), 36 patients with bullous pemphigoid (BP), and 1 patient with clinical and histologic features of epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA) showed an epidermal pattern. Sera from 9 patients with BP showed a combined pattern and sera from 6 patients with EBA and 6 patients with clinical and histologic features of BP showed a dermal pattern. Indirect immunoelectron microscopy of selected sera showed antibodies producing the epidermal and combined patterns were anti-lamina lucida antibodies and those producing the dermal pattern were anti-sublamina densa antibodies. These results show indirect immunofluorescence on separated skin is a dependable method for differentiating bullous disease anti-lamina lucida and anti-sublamina densa antibodies and that differentiating between the antibodies is essential for accurate diagnosis in some patients. The results also suggest BP anti-lamina lucida antibodies may have more than one antigenic specificity.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Rep
                JAAD Case Reports
                Elsevier
                2352-5126
                21 April 2020
                June 2020
                21 April 2020
                : 6
                : 6
                : 518-520
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Dermatology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Blistering Diseases, Groningen, Netherlands
                [b ]Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Blistering Diseases, Groningen, Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Correspondence to: Gilles F. H. Diercks, MD, PhD, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Blistering Diseases, Department of Dermatology and Pathology, Hanzeplein 1, 9700RB, Groningen, the Netherlands. g.f.h.diercks@ 123456umcg.nl
                Article
                S2352-5126(20)30276-9
                10.1016/j.jdcr.2020.04.008
                7256243
                13eca491-e7f2-4508-9384-67198d5d1c10
                © 2020 by the American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier, Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Case Report

                autoimmune blistering disease(s),bullous pemphigoid,case report,igm,igm, immunoglobulin m

                Comments

                Comment on this article