2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in the Iranian blood donors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The present systematic review and meta-analysis was done to assess the rate of Toxoplasma gondii ( T. gondii) exposure among Iranian healthy blood donors.

          Methods

          We searched four English (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct) and two Persian databases (Magiran and SID) as well as Google Scholar as a specialized article search engine using specific keywords for relevant papers from the inception up to November 30, 2023.

          Results

          In total, 19 studies enrolling 8226 apparently healthy blood donors were examined regarding T. gondii-specific IgG and/or IgM antibodies, among which 2666 [32.9% (95% CI: 25.3%–41.6%)], 168 [1.4% (95% CI: 0.9%–2.1%)], and 83 [1.7% (95% CI: 1.3%–2.1%)] subjects were seropositive regarding IgG, IgM, and both IgG/IgM antibodies, respectively. Five risk factors were significantly associated with T. gondii seroprevalence, including gender (OR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.52–2.58; P < 0.001), contact with cat (OR = 2.41; 95% CI: 1.70–3.41; P < 0.001), contact with soil (OR = 2.83; 95% CI: 1.07–7.45; P = 0.035), consuming raw/undercooked meat (OR = 1.95; 95% CI: 1.03–3.70; P = 0.039), and raw/unwashed vegetables (OR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.25–2.31; P = 0.001).

          Conclusion

          A moderate rate of T. gondii exposure was found in the Iranian blood donors, with the association of several risk factors, including gender, contact with cat, contact with soil, consumption of unwashed vegetables and/or undercooked meat. Still, more studies are recommended regarding T. gondii exposure among blood donors in Iran.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

            Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well-described protocols can facilitate the understanding and appraisal of the review methods, as well as the detection of modifications to methods and selective reporting in completed reviews. We describe the development of a reporting guideline, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P 2015). PRISMA-P consists of a 17-item checklist intended to facilitate the preparation and reporting of a robust protocol for the systematic review. Funders and those commissioning reviews might consider mandating the use of the checklist to facilitate the submission of relevant protocol information in funding applications. Similarly, peer reviewers and editors can use the guidance to gauge the completeness and transparency of a systematic review protocol submitted for publication in a journal or other medium.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Panethnic Differences in Blood Pressure in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

              Background People of Sub Saharan Africa (SSA) and South Asians(SA) ethnic minorities living in Europe have higher risk of stroke than native Europeans(EU). Study objective is to provide an assessment of gender specific absolute differences in office systolic(SBP) and diastolic(DBP) blood pressure(BP) levels between SSA, SA, and EU. Methods and Findings We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies conducted in Europe that examined BP in non-selected adult SSA, SA and EU subjects. Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched from their inception through January 31st 2015, for relevant articles. Outcome measures were mean SBP and DBP differences between minorities and EU, using a random effects model and tested for heterogeneity. Twenty-one studies involving 9,070 SSA, 18,421 SA, and 130,380 EU were included. Compared with EU, SSA had higher values of both SBP (3.38 mmHg, 95% CI 1.28 to 5.48 mmHg; and 6.00 mmHg, 95% CI 2.22 to 9.78 in men and women respectively) and DBP (3.29 mmHg, 95% CI 1.80 to 4.78; 5.35 mmHg, 95% CI 3.04 to 7.66). SA had lower SBP than EU(-4.57 mmHg, 95% CI -6.20 to -2.93; -2.97 mmHg, 95% CI -5.45 to -0.49) but similar DBP values. Meta-analysis by subgroup showed that SA originating from countries where Islam is the main religion had lower SBP and DBP values than EU. In multivariate meta-regression analyses, SBP difference between minorities and EU populations, was influenced by panethnicity and diabetes prevalence. Conclusions 1) The higher BP in SSA is maintained over decades, suggesting limited efficacy of prevention strategies in such group in Europe;2) The lower BP in Muslim populations suggests that yet untapped lifestyle and behavioral habits may reveal advantages towards the development of hypertension;3) The additive effect of diabetes, emphasizes the need of new strategies for the control of hypertension in groups at high prevalence of diabetes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Heliyon
                Elsevier
                2405-8440
                13 March 2024
                30 March 2024
                13 March 2024
                : 10
                : 6
                : e28013
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
                [b ]Healthy Aging Research Centre, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
                [c ]Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran
                [d ]Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
                [e ]Medical Microbiology Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Abadan University of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran. masoud_foroutan_rad@ 123456yahoo.com m.foroutan@ 123456abadanums.ac.ir
                [** ]Corresponding author. Healthy Aging Research Centre, Neyshabur University of Medical Sciences, Neyshabur, Iran. hamidreza.majidiani@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2405-8440(24)04044-1 e28013
                10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28013
                10951657
                38509978
                12693b1c-99ae-4743-b445-bd71e89d7264
                © 2024 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 January 2023
                : 9 March 2024
                : 11 March 2024
                Categories
                Review Article

                toxoplasma gondii,blood donors,iran,systematic review,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article