2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Occipitocervical Fixation: General Considerations and Surgical Technique

      review-article
      , MD, PhD 1 , , MD, PhD 2 , , MD 3
      Global Spine Journal
      SAGE Publications
      occipitocervical, craniocervical, fusion, surgical technique

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Design:

          Narrative literature review.

          Objective:

          To review and present details on the occipitocervical fixation (OCF) technique as well as considerations for planning the procedure.

          Methods:

          We present the surgical technique of OCF in a step-by-step didactic and practical manner with surgical tips and tricks, including C1 and C2 screw fixation techniques. Additionally, we discuss complications, the extension of fusion, types of OCF, and how to avoid common side effects associated with OCF.

          Results:

          The complex and mobile anatomy of the craniocervical junction, when requiring fixation and fusion, warrants rigid instrumentation that can be achieve using a modern screw-plate-rod construct. Indications for OCF are craniocervical instability, and atlantoaxial instability when selective atlantoaxial fusion is not feasible. OCF generally involves occiput-C2 fusion. C1 fixation is generally unnecessary, since it increases the surgical time and is associated with the risk of vascular complications. Selective occiput-C2 fusion is recommended when there is no need for including the cervical subaxial region (eg, when stenosis or fractures coexist in the subaxial spine), and good fixation is achieved at C2. Most instrumentation systems now have occipital plates that are not pre-integrated to rods, making fixation much simpler. Surgical steps, from position to wound closure, are presented in detail, with pearls for practice and discussion of cervical alignment.

          Conclusions:

          OCF is a challenging procedure, with potential risk of severe adverse effects. Understanding the surgical indications, as well as the nuances of the surgical technique, is required to improve patient outcomes and avoid complications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biomechanics of the craniocervical region: the alar and transverse ligaments.

          In the treatment of spine fractures and fracture-dislocations, stability of the spine is one of the major objectives. In the craniocervical joint, the alar and transverse ligaments provide much of the stability of the healthy spine. Because the anatomy appears well described, the contribution of each of these structures so far has received little attention. The alar ligament restrains rotation of the upper cervical spine, whereas the transverse ligament restricts flexion as well as anterior displacement of the atlas. A lesion in one or both structures can produce damage to the neural structures and/or cause pain. To investigate the possible role of each of these ligaments, a mechanical and histologic study of the upper cervical spine was made. The bone-ligament-bone complex of the alar and transverse ligaments was subjected to uniaxial mechanical testing in seven specimens. The alar ligaments had an in vitro strength of 200 N, and the transverse ligaments had an in vitro strength of 350 N. Histologic analysis revealed a mainly collagenous nature of these ligaments. Clinical evidence (broken odontoid processes) suggests that the transverse ligament is strong enough to withstand physiologic loads. The alar ligament, on the other hand, due to its lower strength and its axial direction of loading, might be prone to injury and therefore require stabilization of the appropriate vertebra more often than normally is assumed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ligaments of the craniocervical junction.

            The specialized ligaments of the craniocervical junction must allow for stability yet functional movement. Because injury to these important structures usually results in death or morbidity, the neurosurgeon should possess a thorough understanding of the anatomy and function of these ligaments. To the authors' knowledge, a comprehensive review of these structures is not available in the medical literature. The aim of the current study was to distill the available literature on each of these structures into one offering.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The influence of transoral odontoid resection on stability of the craniovertebral junction.

              Twenty-seven cases of craniovertebral junction compression treated with transoral surgery were reviewed to assess the influences of pathological processes and surgical interventions on spinal stability. All patients presented with signs and symptoms of spinal-cord or brain-stem dysfunction. Pathology included rheumatoid arthritis in 11 patients, congenital osseous malformations in 11, spinal fractures in two, plasmacytoma in one, osteomyelitis in one, and a gunshot injury in one. Instability was defined as clear radiographic evidence of mobile subluxation in conjunction with clinical assessment. Of 19 patients (70%) requiring internal fixation, nine underwent upper cervical fusion and 10 had occipitocervical fusion. When instability occurred, all subluxations were at the C1-2 level. There were no occipito-atlantal subluxations. Eight patients (30%) had preoperative instability of the craniovertebral junction due solely to their pathology, 11 patients (40%) suffered instability after transoral surgery, and eight (30%) were without clinical or radiographic evidence of instability (mean follow-up period 14 months). Craniovertebral junction instability predominated among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: 91% required fusion and 45% presented with pre-existing instability. Among individuals with congenital osseous malformations, 45% required fusion and only one patient (9%) had pre-existing instability. Patients who required subsequent posterior decompression of a Chiari malformation were at risk for developing instability; three of four became unstable after posterior decompression. Transoral resection of the dens, the anterior arch of C-1, and the lower clivus does not fully destabilize the spine; however, this operation may potentiate incipient pathological instability. The primary determinants of instability are the extent of pathological bone destruction, ligamentous weakening, and operative bone removal. Long-term follow-up monitoring is needed after transoral surgery to detect cases of late instability.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Global Spine J
                Global Spine J
                GSJ
                spgsj
                Global Spine Journal
                SAGE Publications (Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA )
                2192-5682
                2192-5690
                24 September 2019
                August 2020
                : 10
                : 5
                : 647-656
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP, Brazil
                [2 ]University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
                [3 ]Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
                Author notes
                [*]Andrei Fernandes Joaquim, Department of Neurology, Discipline of Neurosurgery, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, SP 13083-872, Brazil. Email: andjoaquim@ 123456yahoo.com
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2645-0483
                Article
                10.1177_2192568219877878
                10.1177/2192568219877878
                7359687
                32677563
                11552636-4bd7-4b31-ac4d-d34910a17422
                © The Author(s) 2019

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Categories
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                ts3

                occipitocervical,craniocervical,fusion,surgical technique

                Comments

                Comment on this article