7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Palliative Care Early in the Care Continuum among Patients with Serious Respiratory Illness: An Official ATS/AAHPM/HPNA/SWHPN Policy Statement

      research-article
      , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
      American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
      American Thoracic Society
      quality of life, caregivers, healthcare disparities, advance care planning, lung diseases

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers suffer considerable burdens, and palliative care is a fundamental right for anyone who needs it. However, the overwhelming majority of patients do not receive timely palliative care before the end of life, despite robust evidence for improved outcomes.

          Goals

          This policy statement by the American Thoracic Society (ATS) and partnering societies advocates for improved integration of high-quality palliative care early in the care continuum for patients with serious respiratory illness and their caregivers and provides clinicians and policymakers with a framework to accomplish this.

          Methods

          An international and interprofessional expert committee, including patients and caregivers, achieved consensus across a diverse working group representing pulmonary–critical care, palliative care, bioethics, health law and policy, geriatrics, nursing, physiotherapy, social work, pharmacy, patient advocacy, psychology, and sociology.

          Results

          The committee developed fundamental values, principles, and policy recommendations for integrating palliative care in serious respiratory illness care across seven domains: 1) delivery models, 2) comprehensive symptom assessment and management, 3) advance care planning and goals of care discussions, 4) caregiver support, 5) health disparities, 6) mass casualty events and emergency preparedness, and 7) research priorities. The recommendations encourage timely integration of palliative care, promote innovative primary and secondary or specialist palliative care delivery models, and advocate for research and policy initiatives to improve the availability and quality of palliative care for patients and their caregivers.

          Conclusions

          This multisociety policy statement establishes a framework for early palliative care in serious respiratory illness and provides guidance for pulmonary–critical care clinicians and policymakers for its proactive integration.

          Related collections

          Most cited references290

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary

          American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 195(5), 557-582
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

            Patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer have a substantial symptom burden and may receive aggressive care at the end of life. We examined the effect of introducing palliative care early after diagnosis on patient-reported outcomes and end-of-life care among ambulatory patients with newly diagnosed disease. We randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer to receive either early palliative care integrated with standard oncologic care or standard oncologic care alone. Quality of life and mood were assessed at baseline and at 12 weeks with the use of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, respectively. The primary outcome was the change in the quality of life at 12 weeks. Data on end-of-life care were collected from electronic medical records. Of the 151 patients who underwent randomization, 27 died by 12 weeks and 107 (86% of the remaining patients) completed assessments. Patients assigned to early palliative care had a better quality of life than did patients assigned to standard care (mean score on the FACT-L scale [in which scores range from 0 to 136, with higher scores indicating better quality of life], 98.0 vs. 91.5; P=0.03). In addition, fewer patients in the palliative care group than in the standard care group had depressive symptoms (16% vs. 38%, P=0.01). Despite the fact that fewer patients in the early palliative care group than in the standard care group received aggressive end-of-life care (33% vs. 54%, P=0.05), median survival was longer among patients receiving early palliative care (11.6 months vs. 8.9 months, P=0.02). Among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, early palliative care led to significant improvements in both quality of life and mood. As compared with patients receiving standard care, patients receiving early palliative care had less aggressive care at the end of life but longer survival. (Funded by an American Society of Clinical Oncology Career Development Award and philanthropic gifts; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01038271.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

              Widespread application of pulmonary rehabilitation (also known as respiratory rehabilitation) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) should be preceded by demonstrable improvements in function (health-related quality of life, functional and maximal exercise capacity) attributable to the programmes. This review updates the review reported in 2006.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                On behalf of : on behalf of the American Thoracic Society, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association, and Social Work Hospice and Palliative Care Network
                Journal
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                Am J Respir Crit Care Med
                ajrccm
                American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
                American Thoracic Society
                1073-449X
                1535-4970
                01 December 2022
                15 September 2022
                01 December 2022
                : 206
                : 6
                : e44-e69
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Donald R. Sullivan, M.D., M.A., M.C.R., 3181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239-3098. E-mail: sullivad@ 123456ohsu.edu .
                [*]

                These authors are co–senior authors.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3266-3389
                Article
                202207-1262ST
                10.1164/rccm.202207-1262ST
                9799127
                36112774
                10e7bf21-2841-4aea-a56b-ff8536dc6119
                Copyright © 2022 by the American Thoracic Society

                This article is open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License 4.0. For commercial usage and reprints, please e-mail Diane Gern ( dgern@ 123456thoracic.org ).

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 10, References: 277, Pages: 27
                Funding
                Funded by: Supported by Sojourns Scholar Leadership Program Award of the Cambia Health Foundation (D.R.S. and T.K.F.); U54MD002265 and UL1TR002548 (J.D.T.); NHMRC Investigator Grant (APP1196061) and Windermere Foundation Program Grant (N.S.); National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Career Development Fellowship (CDF-2017–10-009) and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (M.M.); NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England (M.F.); R21 NR016743, U54 MD012530, and R01 AG058915 (C.E.C.); R01 NR015768 (M.L.C.); K01HL141637 (A.E.T.); National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K76AG064327 and consulting fees from AstraZeneca (A.S.I.);
                Award ID: and grant funding from PCORI (R.A.M.).
                Categories
                American Thoracic Society Documents

                quality of life,caregivers,healthcare disparities,advance care planning,lung diseases

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content84

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors2,831