24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Resorbable Antibiotic-Eluting Polymer Composite Bone Void Filler for Perioperative Infection Prevention in a Rabbit Radial Defect Model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Nearly 1.3 million total joint replacement procedures are performed in the United States annually, with numbers projected to rise exponentially in the coming decades. Although finite infection rates for these procedures remain consistently low, device-related infections represent a significant cause of implant failure, requiring secondary or revision procedures. Revision procedures manifest several-fold higher infection recurrence rates. Importantly, many revision surgeries, infected or not, require bone void fillers to support the host bone and provide a sufficient tissue bed for new hardware placement. Antibiotic-eluting bone void fillers (ABVF), providing both osteoconductive and antimicrobial properties, represent one approach for reducing rates of orthopedic device-related infections. Using a solvent-free, molten-cast process, a polymer-controlled antibiotic-eluting calcium carbonate hydroxyapatite (HAP) ceramic composite BVF (ABVF) was fabricated, characterized, and evaluated in vivo using a bacterial challenge in a rabbit radial defect window model. ABVF loaded with tobramycin eliminated the infectious burden in rabbits challenged with a clinically relevant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (inoculum as high as 10 7 CFU). Histological, microbiological, and radiographic methods were used to detail the effects of ABVF on microbial challenge to host bone after 8 weeks in vivo. In contrast to the HAP/BVF controls, which provided no antibiotic protection and required euthanasia 3 weeks post-operatively, tobramycin-releasing ABVF animals showed no signs of infection (clinical, microbiological, or radiographic) when euthanized at the 8-week study endpoint. ABVF sites did exhibit fibrous encapsulation around the implant at 8 weeks. Local antibiotic release from ABVF to orthopedic sites requiring bone void fillers eliminated the periprosthetic bacterial challenge in this 8-week in vivo study, confirming previous in vitro results.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bone substitutes: an update.

          Autograft is considered ideal for grafting procedures, providing osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and an osteoconductive scaffold. Limitations, however, exist regarding donor site morbidity and graft availability. Allograft on the other hand, posses the risk of disease transmission. Synthetic graft substitutes lack osteoinductive or osteogenic properties. Composite grafts combine scaffolding properties with biological elements to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation and eventually osteogenesis. We present here an overview of bone grafts and graft substitutes available for clinical applications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reducing implant-related infections: active release strategies.

            Despite sterilization and aseptic procedures, bacterial infection remains a major impediment to the utility of medical implants including catheters, artificial prosthetics, and subcutaneous sensors. Indwelling devices are responsible for over half of all nosocomial infections, with an estimate of 1 million cases per year (2004) in the United States alone. Device-associated infections are the result of bacterial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation at the implantation site. Although useful for relieving associated systemic infections, conventional antibiotic therapies remain ineffective against biofilms. Unfortunately, the lack of a suitable treatment often leaves extraction of the contaminated device as the only viable option for eliminating the biofilm. Much research has focused on developing polymers that resist bacterial adhesion for use as medical device coatings. This tutorial review focuses on coatings that release antimicrobial agents (i.e., active release strategies) for reducing the incidence of implant-associated infection. Following a brief introduction to bacteria, biofilms, and infection, the development and study of coatings that slowly release antimicrobial agents such as antibiotics, silver ions, antibodies, and nitric oxide are covered. The success and limitations of these strategies are highlighted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Antibacterial surfaces for biomedical devices.

              Despite considerable research and development efforts, the problem of infections related to biomedical devices and implants persists. Bacteria evidently can readily colonize surfaces of synthetic materials, such as those used for the fabrication of catheters, hip and knee implants, and many other devices. As the growing colony encapsulates itself with a protective exocellular bacterial polysaccharide layer, the biofilm becomes much harder to combat than circulating bacteria. Thus, there is a strong need to mitigate bacterial colonization by equipping the surfaces of biomedical devices and implants with features such as surface chemistry and surface roughness that are unfavorable for bacterial attachment. Here we review a number of strategies used for the design of antibacterial coatings. We also discuss specific issues that arise from using various types of coatings.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                27 March 2015
                2015
                : 10
                : 3
                : e0118696
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112–5820, United States of America
                [2 ]Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112–5820, United States of America
                [3 ]Elute Inc., 417 Wakara Way, Suite 3510, Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States of America
                Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences, Kyoto University, JAPAN
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: KS, DG, and AB have equity interest in Elute, Inc. KS is also employed by the study sponsor. BB, DG, and AB have a patent on the drug release technology described in this manuscript and licensed to Elute Inc., Salt Lake City, UT through the University of Utah. This does not alter the authors' adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: BB KS AB DG. Performed the experiments: BB AB. Analyzed the data: BB KS AB DG. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AB DG KS. Wrote the paper: BB KS AB DG.

                [¤]

                Current address: Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences at North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, 58105, United States of America

                Article
                PONE-D-14-30552
                10.1371/journal.pone.0118696
                4376868
                25815727
                109b1a7c-6cd2-4f8d-aa8c-856838bf11c9
                Copyright @ 2015

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

                History
                : 10 July 2014
                : 23 January 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 3, Pages: 19
                Funding
                This work was supported by the University of Utah Technology Commercialization Office. The funder, Elute, Inc. provided support in the form of salaries for authors [AEB and KS], but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. In addition, KS is employed by the study sponsor, Elute Inc., Salt Lake City, UT. DG, KS and AB have consulting and/or equity interests in the study sponsor, Elute Inc., Salt Lake City, UT. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                All data has been uploaded to Dryad. doi: 10.5061/dryad.q84m0.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article