0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The search for blood biomarkers that indicate risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes in fetal growth restriction

      systematic-review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Fetal growth restriction (FGR) impacts 5%–10% of pregnancies and is associated with increased risk of mortality and morbidity. Although adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes are observed in up to 50% of FGR infants, a diagnosis of FGR does not indicate the level of risk for an individual infant and these infants are not routinely followed up to assess neurodevelopmental outcomes. Identifying FGR infants at increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes would greatly assist in providing appropriate support and interventions earlier, resulting in improved outcomes. However, current methods to detect brain injury around the time of birth lack the sensitivity required to detect the more subtle alterations associated with FGR. Blood biomarkers have this potential. This systematic review assessed the current literature on blood biomarkers for identifying FGR infants at increased risk of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes at >12 months after birth. Four databases were searched from inception to 22 February 2024. Articles were assessed for meeting the inclusion criteria by two reviewers. The quality of the included article was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2. A summary of findings is presented as insufficient articles were identified for meta-analysis. Excluding duplicates, 1,368 records were screened with only 9 articles considered for full text review. Only one article met all the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment indicated low risk of bias. Both blood biomarkers investigated in this study, neuron specific enolase and S100B, demonstrated inverse relationships with neurodevelopmental assessments at 2 years. Four studies did not meet all the inclusion criteria yet identified promising findings for metabolites and cytokines which are discussed here. These findings support the need for further research and highlight the potential for blood biomarkers to predict adverse outcomes.

          Systematic Review Registration

          https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=369242, Identifier CRD42022369242.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.

          In 2003, the QUADAS tool for systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy studies was developed. Experience, anecdotal reports, and feedback suggested areas for improvement; therefore, QUADAS-2 was developed. This tool comprises 4 domains: patient selection, index test, reference standard, and flow and timing. Each domain is assessed in terms of risk of bias, and the first 3 domains are also assessed in terms of concerns regarding applicability. Signalling questions are included to help judge risk of bias. The QUADAS-2 tool is applied in 4 phases: summarize the review question, tailor the tool and produce review-specific guidance, construct a flow diagram for the primary study, and judge bias and applicability. This tool will allow for more transparent rating of bias and applicability of primary diagnostic accuracy studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment.

            Cerebral palsy describes the most common physical disability in childhood and occurs in 1 in 500 live births. Historically, the diagnosis has been made between age 12 and 24 months but now can be made before 6 months' corrected age.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure.

              To determine, by expert consensus, a definition for early and late fetal growth restriction (FGR) through a Delphi procedure.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2767820/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/679166/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/729007/overviewRole: Role: Role:
                Role: Role:
                Role: Role: Role:
                URI : https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/646014/overviewRole: Role: Role: Role:
                Journal
                Front Pediatr
                Front Pediatr
                Front. Pediatr.
                Frontiers in Pediatrics
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-2360
                20 June 2024
                2024
                : 12
                : 1396102
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [ 2 ]Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, Child Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [ 3 ]Perinatal Research Centre, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Minesh Khashu, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom

                Reviewed by: Helen B. Stolp, Royal Veterinary College (RVC), United Kingdom

                Karel Allegaert, KU Leuven, Belgium

                [* ] Correspondence: Julie A. Wixey j.wixey@ 123456uq.edu.au
                Article
                10.3389/fped.2024.1396102
                11222567
                38966491
                10474c0a-2358-4b94-ac2d-660a4f712038
                © 2024 Musco, Beecher, Chand, Boyd, Colditz and Wixey.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 March 2024
                : 11 June 2024
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 41, Pages: 7, Words: 0
                Funding
                The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
                JW received funding from a NHMRC Fellowship. HM received funding from a University of Queensland Research Training Program Stipend and the Dr Jian Zhou Memorial Scholarship. RB received funding from a NHMRC Fellowship.
                Categories
                Pediatrics
                Systematic Review
                Custom metadata
                Neonatology

                fetal growth retardation,intrauterine growth restriction,small for gestational age,detection,newborn,brain

                Comments

                Comment on this article