2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Bronchial Thermoplasty Global Registry (BTGR): 2-year results

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a device-based treatment for subjects ≥18 years with severe asthma not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. The Bronchial Thermoplasty Global Registry (BTGR) collected real-world data on subjects undergoing this procedure.

          Design

          The BTGR is an all-comer, prospective, open-label, multicentre study enrolling adult subjects indicated for and treated with BT.

          Setting

          Eighteen centres in Spain, Italy, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, South Africa and Australia

          Participants

          One hundred fifty-seven subjects aged 18 years and older who were scheduled to undergo BT treatment for asthma. Subjects diagnosed with other medical conditions which, in the investigator’s opinion, made them inappropriate for BT treatment were excluded.

          Primary and secondary outcome measures

          Baseline characteristics collected included demographics, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), medication usage, forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity, medical history, comorbidities and 12-month baseline recall data (severe exacerbations (SE) and healthcare utilisation). SE incidence and healthcare utilisation were summarised at 1 and 2 years post-BT.

          Results

          Subjects’ baseline characteristics were representative of persons with severe asthma. A comparison of the proportion of subjects experiencing events during the 12 months prior to BT to the 2-year follow-up showed a reduction in SE (90.3% vs 56.1%, p<0.0001), emergency room visits (53.8% vs 25.5%, p<0.0001) and hospitalisations (42.9% vs 23.5 %, p=0.0019). Reductions in asthma maintenance medication dosage were also observed. AQLQ and ACT scores improved from 3.26 and 11.18 at baseline to 4.39 and 15.54 at 2 years, respectively (p<0.0001 for both AQLQ and ACT).

          Conclusions

          The BTGR demonstrates sustained improvement in clinical outcomes and reduction in asthma medication usage 2 years after BT in a real-world population. This is consistent with results from other BT randomised controlled trials and registries and further supports improvement in asthma control after BT.

          Trial registration number

          NCT02104856.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma.

          Severe or therapy-resistant asthma is increasingly recognised as a major unmet need. A Task Force, supported by the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society, reviewed the definition and provided recommendations and guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of severe asthma in children and adults. A literature review was performed, followed by discussion by an expert committee according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach for development of specific clinical recommendations. When the diagnosis of asthma is confirmed and comorbidities addressed, severe asthma is defined as asthma that requires treatment with high dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller and/or systemic corticosteroids to prevent it from becoming "uncontrolled" or that remains "uncontrolled" despite this therapy. Severe asthma is a heterogeneous condition consisting of phenotypes such as eosinophilic asthma. Specific recommendations on the use of sputum eosinophil count and exhaled nitric oxide to guide therapy, as well as treatment with anti-IgE antibody, methotrexate, macrolide antibiotics, antifungal agents and bronchial thermoplasty are provided. Coordinated research efforts for improved phenotyping will provide safe and effective biomarker-driven approaches to severe asthma therapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Economic Burden of Asthma in the United States, 2008 - 2013

            Asthma is a chronic disease that affects quality of life, productivity at work and school, and healthcare use; and it can result in death. Measuring the current economic burden of asthma provides important information on the impact of asthma on society. This information can be used to make informed decisions about allocation of limited public health resources.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in the treatment of severe asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial.

              Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a bronchoscopic procedure in which controlled thermal energy is applied to the airway wall to decrease smooth muscle. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of BT versus a sham procedure in subjects with severe asthma who remain symptomatic despite treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta(2)-agonists. A total of 288 adult subjects (Intent-to-Treat [ITT]) randomized to BT or sham control underwent three bronchoscopy procedures. Primary outcome was the difference in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores from baseline to average of 6, 9, and 12 months (integrated AQLQ). Adverse events and health care use were collected to assess safety. Statistical design and analysis of the primary endpoint was Bayesian. Target posterior probability of superiority (PPS) of BT over sham was 95%, except for the primary endpoint (96.4%). The improvement from baseline in the integrated AQLQ score was superior in the BT group compared with sham (BT, 1.35 +/- 1.10; sham, 1.16 +/- 1.23 [PPS, 96.0% ITT and 97.9% per protocol]). Seventy-nine percent of BT and 64% of sham subjects achieved changes in AQLQ of 0.5 or greater (PPS, 99.6%). Six percent more BT subjects were hospitalized in the treatment period (up to 6 wk after BT). In the posttreatment period (6-52 wk after BT), the BT group experienced fewer severe exacerbations, emergency department (ED) visits, and days missed from work/school compared with the sham group (PPS, 95.5, 99.9, and 99.3%, respectively). BT in subjects with severe asthma improves asthma-specific quality of life with a reduction in severe exacerbations and healthcare use in the posttreatment period. Clinical trial registered with www.clinialtrials.gov (NCT00231114).
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2021
                16 December 2021
                : 11
                : 12
                : e053854
                Affiliations
                [1 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau , Barcelona, Spain
                [2 ]departmentThoraxklinik , University of Heidelberg , Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
                [3 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Hospital Josep Trueta , Girona, Catalunya, Spain
                [4 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon-Facultad de Medicina Universidad Complutense , Madrid, Spain
                [5 ]departmentAUSL-IRCCS Reggio Emilia Pulmonology Unit , IRCCS Reggio Emilia Pulmonology Unit , Santa Maria Nuova, Italy
                [6 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Gartnavel General Hospital , Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
                [7 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia , Brescia, Lombardia, Italy
                [8 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Università Politecnica delle Marche , Ancona, Marche, Italy
                [9 ]departmentRespiratory Department , University of Cape Town , Cape Town, South Africa
                [10 ]departmentPulmonology Department , Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol—CIBERES, Badalona , Barcelona, Spain
                [11 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Klinika Tuberkulozy a Respiracnich Onemocneni , Prague, Czech Republic
                [12 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Frankston Hospital Peninsula Health , Frankston, Victoria, Australia
                [13 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Hospital Universitario Fundacion Jimenez Diaz—CIBERES IIS-FJD , Madrid, Spain
                [14 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital—Brisbane/AUS , Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
                [15 ]departmentDepartment of Respiratory Medicine , Amsterdam University Medical Centers , Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [16 ]departmentDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumology , University of Bonn, Medizinische Klinik II , Bonn, Germany
                [17 ]departmentRespiratory Department , University Hospital Regensburg , Regensburg, Bayern, Germany
                [18 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Ruhrlandklinik—West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen , Essen, Germany
                [19 ]Boston Scientific Corp , Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA
                [20 ]departmentRespiratory Department , Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Dr Alfons Torrego; atorrego@ 123456santpau.cat
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6624-2465
                Article
                bmjopen-2021-053854
                10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053854
                8679080
                34916324
                0fa56dec-2290-4c79-907f-86abf6608c31
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See:  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 26 May 2021
                : 25 November 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100008497, Boston Scientific Corporation;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Respiratory Medicine
                1506
                1731
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                respiratory medicine (see thoracic medicine),asthma,bronchoscopy,chronic airways disease

                Comments

                Comment on this article