4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Epidemiology of limb loss and congenital limb deficiency: A review of the literature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To examine the state of research on population-based studies of the incidence of limb amputation and birth prevalence of limb deficiency. A total of 18 publication databases were searched, including MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The search was performed by using a hierarchical process. Articles were reviewed for inclusion by 3 reviewers. Inclusion criteria included defined catchment area, calculation of population-based incidence rates, defined etiology of limb loss, and English language. Review articles, animal studies, case reports, cohort studies, letters, and editorials were excluded. Figures on the estimated incidence of amputation and birth prevalence of congenital limb deficiency were gleaned from selected reports and assembled into a table format by etiology. The studies varied in scope, quality, and methodology, making comparisons between studies difficult. Incidence rates of acquired amputation varied greatly between and within nations. Rates of all-cause acquired amputation ranged from 1.2 first major amputations per 10,000 women in Japan to 4.4 per 10,000 men in the Navajo Nation in the United States between 1992 and 1997. Consistent among all nations, the risk of amputation was greatest among persons with diabetes mellitus. Surveillance of congenital limb deficiency exists in much of the developed world. Existing studies of acquired amputation suffer from a host of methodologic problems. Future efforts should be directed toward the application of standardized measures and methods to enable trends to be evaluated over time and comparisons to be made within and between countries.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
          Elsevier BV
          00039993
          May 2003
          : 84
          : 5
          : 747-761
          Article
          10.1016/S0003-9993(03)04932-8
          12736892
          0f3ea364-6e3d-4095-8924-34414cbfb7ab
          © 2003

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article