2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of air pollution and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure with gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The association between air pollution (AP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), especially between different pollutants and GDM, remains controversial and debatable. Hence, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to provide comprehensive evidence-based support for the association between AP and GDM.

          Methods

          The databases of the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science were searched from inception to 1 April 2022, in combination with manual retrieval. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of case-control studies and cohort studies, while the Joana Brigg’s Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist was used for the quality assessment of cross-sectional studies.

          Results

          We identified 35 epidemiological studies (including 33 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study, and 1 case-control study) covering 6,939,725 pregnant women, of whom 865,460 were GDM patients. The NOS score of all included case-control studies and cohort studies was higher than six, and one of the included cross-sectional studies was rated as high quality according to the JBI assessment. Meta-analysis showed that fine particulate matter and air pollutants [PM2.5, odds ratio (OR) =1.06, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05–1.08, Z =7.76, P<0.001; PM10, OR =1.06, 95% CI: 1.01–1.11, Z =2.62, P=0.009; sulfur dioxide (SO 2), OR =1.18, 95% CI: 1.10–1.26, Z = 4.69, P<0.001; nitric oxide (NO), OR =1.04, 95% CI: 1.03–1.06,Z =3.33, P=0.001; nitrogen oxides (NO X), OR =1.07, 95% CI: 1.04–1.11, Z =3.93, P<0.001; black carbon (BC), OR =1.08, 95% CI: 1.06–1.10, Z =7.58, P<0.001] was associated with GDM. Furthermore, no significant association was observed between O 3, CO, and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) exposure and GDM.

          Conclusions

          Exposure to PM2.5, PM10, SO 2, NO, NO X, and BC significantly increases the risk of GDM. AP is a remediable environmental trigger that can be prevented by human interventions, such as lowering AP levels or limiting human exposure to air pollutants. The government should strengthen the supervision of air quality and make air quality information more transparent. Besides, living conditions are crucial during pregnancy. Living in a place with more green areas is recommended, and indoor air purification should also be enhanced.

          Related collections

          Most cited references56

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mechanisms, Treatment, and Complications

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Association between Ambient Air Pollution and Diabetes Mellitus in Europe and North America: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

            Background Air pollution is hypothesized to be a risk factor for diabetes. Epidemiological evidence is inconsistent and has not been systematically evaluated. Objectives We systematically reviewed epidemiological evidence on the association between air pollution and diabetes, and synthesized results of studies on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We systematically searched electronic literature databases (last search, 29 April 2014) for studies reporting the association between air pollution (particle concentration or traffic exposure) and diabetes (type 1, type 2, or gestational). We systematically evaluated risk of bias and role of potential confounders in all studies. We synthesized reported associations with T2DM in meta-analyses using random-effects models and conducted various sensitivity analyses. Results We included 13 studies (8 on T2DM, 2 on type 1, 3 on gestational diabetes), all conducted in Europe or North America. Five studies were longitudinal, 5 cross-sectional, 2 case–control, and 1 ecologic. Risk of bias, air pollution assessment, and confounder control varied across studies. Dose–response effects were not reported. Meta-analyses of 3 studies on PM2.5 (particulate matter ≤ 2.5 μm in diameter) and 4 studies on NO2 (nitrogen dioxide) showed increased risk of T2DM by 8–10% per 10-μg/m3 increase in exposure [PM2.5: 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.18); NO2: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17)]. Associations were stronger in females. Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. Conclusion Existing evidence indicates a positive association of air pollution and T2DM risk, albeit there is high risk of bias. High-quality studies assessing dose–response effects are needed. Research should be expanded to developing countries where outdoor and indoor air pollution are high. Citation Eze IC, Hemkens LG, Bucher HC, Hoffmann B, Schindler C, Künzli N, Schilowski T, Probst-Hensch NM. 2015. Association between ambient air pollution and diabetes mellitus in Europe and North America: systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 123:381–389; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1307823
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              The 2016 global and national burden of diabetes mellitus attributable to PM 2·5 air pollution

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Transl Med
                Ann Transl Med
                ATM
                Annals of Translational Medicine
                AME Publishing Company
                2305-5839
                2305-5847
                15 January 2023
                15 January 2023
                15 January 2023
                : 11
                : 1
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Chengdu Shuangliu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China;
                [2 ]Science and education section , Chengdu Shuangliu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, China
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: Z Ren; (II) Administrative support: Y Li; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: Z Ren, J Yuan; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Y Luo, J Wang; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Z Ren, J Yuan; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors

                Correspondence to: Yanqin Li. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chengdu Shuangliu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, No. 396 Jiancao Middle Street, Shuangliu District, Chengdu 610200, China. Email: 904147375@ 123456qq.com .
                Article
                atm-11-01-23
                10.21037/atm-22-6306
                9906206
                36760250
                0d699f1f-1e53-43ca-9ac9-611582c72450
                2023 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 29 November 2022
                : 12 January 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                air pollution (ap),gestational diabetes,meta-analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article