3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Multi-DOF (Degree of Freedom) Articulating Laparoscopic Instrument is an Effective Device in Performing Challenging Sutures

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose

          Although laparoscopic surgery had been performed in clinical practice for over 30 years, there has not been much improvement on instruments. Several articulating laparoscopic instruments have been developed including the robotic system. A new multi-degree of freedom (DOF) articulating laparoscopic device has been developed. We compared the ability to perform challenging sutures between the new device and the robotic system.

          Methods

          Five experienced surgeons with over 100 laparoscopic surgery cases performed the suture task with both instruments. Everyone was new at articulating instruments including a robotic system. The suturing task consisted of two vertical sutures, downward and upward vertical direction. The duration of needle grabbing, first surgical tie, square tie, and the final reverse tie was measured.

          Results

          When doing the downward suture, the median time to complete the suture was 127 vs. 136 seconds for ArtiSential ® and the robot, respectively ( p=0.754). Other measurements such as needle grabbing, first tie, second tie and final knot did not show any significant difference between the two instruments. Upward suture also did not show a significant difference. The total completion time was 127 vs. 112 seconds for for ArtiSential ® and the robot, respectively ( p=0.675). Time taken in each interval did not show any significant difference.

          Conclusion

          Both instruments performed the suturing tasks with no difference in duration. ArtiSential ® can be mixed up with usual instruments. Surgeons can choose any device, but when articulation is needed, ArtiSential ® could be an alternative choice to the robotic system.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study.

          The oncologic outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer have not been evaluated. The aim of this study is to validate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in terms of long-term survival, morbidity, and mortality retrospectively.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Multicenter Prospective Comparative Study of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

            To compare short-term surgical outcomes including financial cost of robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial).

              The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of this trial with respect to morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is rapidly gaining popularity. However, there is limited evidence regarding its oncologic safety. We therefore conducted a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized study comparing LADG with open gastrectomy (ODG). Patient eligibility criteria were pathologically-proven adenocarcinoma, 20 to 80 years of age, preoperative stage I, no history of other cancer, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. The primary end point was to determine whether there is a difference in overall survival between 2 groups. The morbidity and mortality were compared to evaluate the safety of this trial. The time was decided on the hypothesis that the morbidity of this trial was not significantly different from that of previous reports on open gastric cancer surgeries (17%-20%). This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov and carries the following ID number: NCT00452751. A total of 342 patients were randomized (LADG, 179 patients; ODG, 161 patients) between January 1, 2006 and July 19, 2007. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, gender, and comorbidities. The postoperative complication rates of the LADG and ODG groups were 10.5% (17/179) and 14.7% (24/163), respectively (P = 0.137). Reoperations were required in 3 cases each group. The postoperative mortality was 1.1% (2/179) and 0% (0/163) in the LADG and ODG groups (P = 0.497), respectively. There was no significance difference in the morbidity and mortality between the 2 groups. Therefore, we conclude that this trial is safe and is thus ongoing.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Minim Invasive Surg
                J Minim Invasive Surg
                J Minim Invasive Surg
                Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
                The Korean Society of Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Surgeons
                2234-778X
                2234-5248
                15 December 2019
                15 December 2019
                : 22
                : 4
                : 157-163
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
                [2 ]Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Sang-Hoon Ahn, Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 82 Gumi-ro 173 Beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam 13620, Korea, Tel: +82-31-787-7099, Fax: +82-31-787-4078, E-mail: viscaria@ 123456snubh.org , ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6150-7935
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2436-287X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5404-5667
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2643-2007
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9759
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-6127
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6267-1550
                Article
                jmis-22-4-157
                10.7602/jmis.2019.22.4.157
                8980149
                0d1977a7-6627-4288-9370-dcc92f874ebb
                Copyright © 2019 The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 May 2019
                : 30 June 2019
                : 24 July 2019
                : 06 August 2019
                Categories
                Original Article

                laparoscopy,articulation,instrument,robotics,suture
                laparoscopy, articulation, instrument, robotics, suture

                Comments

                Comment on this article