13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Nutritional Aspects of Ecologically Relevant Phytochemicals in Ruminant Production

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This review provides an update of ecologically relevant phytochemicals for ruminant production, focusing on their contribution to advancing nutrition. Phytochemicals embody a broad spectrum of chemical components that influence resource competence and biological advantage in determining plant species' distribution and density in different ecosystems. These natural compounds also often act as plant defensive chemicals against predatorial microbes, insects, and herbivores. They may modulate or exacerbate microbial transactions in the gastrointestinal tract and physiological responses in ruminant microbiomes. To harness their production-enhancing characteristics, phytochemicals have been actively researched as feed additives to manipulate ruminal fermentation and establish other phytochemoprophylactic (prevent animal diseases) and phytochemotherapeutic (treat animal diseases) roles. However, phytochemical-host interactions, the exact mechanism of action, and their effects require more profound elucidation to provide definitive recommendations for ruminant production. The majority of phytochemicals of nutritional and pharmacological interest are typically classified as flavonoids (9%), terpenoids (55%), and alkaloids (36%). Within flavonoids, polyphenolics (e.g., hydrolyzable and condensed tannins) have many benefits to ruminants, including reducing methane (CH 4) emission, gastrointestinal nematode parasitism, and ruminal proteolysis. Within terpenoids, saponins and essential oils also mitigate CH 4 emission, but triterpenoid saponins have rich biochemical structures with many clinical benefits in humans. The anti-methanogenic property in ruminants is variable because of the simultaneous targeting of several physiological pathways. This may explain saponin-containing forages' relative safety for long-term use and describe associated molecular interactions on all ruminant metabolism phases. Alkaloids are N-containing compounds with vast pharmacological properties currently used to treat humans, but their phytochemical usage as feed additives in ruminants has yet to be exploited as they may act as ghost compounds alongside other phytochemicals of known importance. We discussed strategic recommendations for phytochemicals to support sustainable ruminant production, such as replacements for antibiotics and anthelmintics. Topics that merit further examination are discussed and include the role of fresh forages vis-à-vis processed feeds in confined ruminant operations. Applications and benefits of phytochemicals to humankind are yet to be fully understood or utilized. Scientific explorations have provided promising results, pending thorough vetting before primetime use, such that academic and commercial interests in the technology are fully adopted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references310

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Biological effects of essential oils--a review.

          Since the middle ages, essential oils have been widely used for bactericidal, virucidal, fungicidal, antiparasitical, insecticidal, medicinal and cosmetic applications, especially nowadays in pharmaceutical, sanitary, cosmetic, agricultural and food industries. Because of the mode of extraction, mostly by distillation from aromatic plants, they contain a variety of volatile molecules such as terpenes and terpenoids, phenol-derived aromatic components and aliphatic components. In vitro physicochemical assays characterise most of them as antioxidants. However, recent work shows that in eukaryotic cells, essential oils can act as prooxidants affecting inner cell membranes and organelles such as mitochondria. Depending on type and concentration, they exhibit cytotoxic effects on living cells but are usually non-genotoxic. In some cases, changes in intracellular redox potential and mitochondrial dysfunction induced by essential oils can be associated with their capacity to exert antigenotoxic effects. These findings suggest that, at least in part, the encountered beneficial effects of essential oils are due to prooxidant effects on the cellular level.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antimicrobial agents from plants: antibacterial activity of plant volatile oils.

            The volatile oils of black pepper [Piper nigrum L. (Piperaceae)], clove [Syzygium aromaticum (L.) Merr. & Perry (Myrtaceae)], geranium [Pelargonium graveolens L'Herit (Geraniaceae)], nutmeg [Myristica fragrans Houtt. (Myristicaceae), oregano [Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum (Link) Letsw. (Lamiaceae)] and thyme [Thymus vulgaris L. (Lamiaceae)] were assessed for antibacterial activity against 25 different genera of bacteria. These included animal and plant pathogens, food poisoning and spoilage bacteria. The volatile oils exhibited considerable inhibitory effects against all the organisms under test while their major components demonstrated various degrees of growth inhibition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Characterization of the Action of Selected Essential Oil Components on Gram-Negative Bacteria

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Vet Sci
                Front Vet Sci
                Front. Vet. Sci.
                Frontiers in Veterinary Science
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2297-1769
                05 March 2021
                2021
                : 8
                : 628445
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX, United States
                [2] 2Texas A&M AgriLife Research , Stephenville, TX, United States
                [3] 3Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri , Columbia, MO, United States
                [4] 4Department of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University , Lubbock, TX, United States
                [5] 5CR Eco-efficient Agriculture Consultancy (CREAC)™ , Bushland Beach, QLD, Australia
                [6] 6Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Texas A&M University , College Station, TX, United States
                Author notes

                Edited by: Uchenna Anele, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, United States

                Reviewed by: Elsa Lamy, University of Évora, Portugal; Jorge Avila Stagno, University of Concepcion, Chile; Mabrouk Elsabagh, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt

                *Correspondence: Luis O. Tedeschi luis.tedeschi@ 123456tamu.edu

                This article was submitted to Animal Nutrition and Metabolism, a section of the journal Frontiers in Veterinary Science

                Article
                10.3389/fvets.2021.628445
                7973208
                33748210
                0cca36b8-a8c7-44d3-baf2-80b7171fbd2c
                Copyright © 2021 Tedeschi, Muir, Naumann, Norris, Ramírez-Restrepo and Mertens-Talcott.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 11 November 2020
                : 04 February 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 310, Pages: 24, Words: 22792
                Categories
                Veterinary Science
                Review

                feed additive,methods,nutrition,rumen modifiers,ruminants,antinutritive factor

                Comments

                Comment on this article