19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research.

      Current Opinion in Rheumatology
      Clinical Medicine, methods, Clinical Trials as Topic, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Research Design, Rheumatic Diseases, physiopathology, therapy, Rheumatology, Treatment Outcome

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for an instrument is a much sought after, but elusive figure. In this review we will highlight new findings in this area, including taxonomy of MCID, methods used to ascertain MCID, the perspective taken for evaluating importance, and other sources of variation for MCID values. In the end we believe the MCID will be a context-specific value rather than a fixed number. The review highlights the need to do methodological research in this area, especially concurrent comparisons between approaches, or across different patient groups. There are many faces to the MCID, it is not a simple concept, nor simple to calculate.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          11845014
          10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006

          Chemistry
          Clinical Medicine,methods,Clinical Trials as Topic,Health Status Indicators,Humans,Research Design,Rheumatic Diseases,physiopathology,therapy,Rheumatology,Treatment Outcome

          Comments

          Comment on this article