8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical and patient-reported outcome of implant restorations with internal conical connection in daily dental practices: prospective observational multicenter trial with up to 7-year follow-up

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The interpretation of the results of randomized clinical trials is often questioned in relation with daily circumstances in practices. This prospective observational multicenter study was instigated to reflect the need for information in real-life situations with dental implants with internal conical implant-abutment connection (Conelog implant system). The implants were followed up at least 5-year post-loading; survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier), changes of soft tissue, and bone level over time, as well as patient satisfaction were evaluated.

          Results

          In total, 130 dental implants were placed in 94 patients (64 female, 30 male). Mean age of patients was 50.4 ± 13.7. At 5-year post-loading, 104 implants in 76 patients were available for evaluation. The cumulative implant survival rate was 96.6%. After an initial bone remodeling process post-surgery (bone loss of − 0.52 ± 0.55 mm), the bone level change remained clinically stable from loading to 5-year post-loading (− 0.09 ± 0.43 mm). Patient satisfaction surveyed by questionnaire (comfort, ability to chew and taste, esthetics, general satisfaction) steadily increased towards the end. At the last study follow-up, all the patients rated their general satisfaction as either very satisfied (87.5%) or satisfied (12.5%).

          Conclusion

          The study implants have shown to be highly effective with reliable peri-implant tissue stability over the 5 to 7 years of observation for both single tooth restorations and fixed partial dentures while used in standard conditions in daily dental practice. The results obtained are comparable with those obtained in controlled clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

          To assess the 5-year survival of implant-supported single crowns (SCs) and to describe the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications. The focused question was: What is the survival rate of implants supporting single crowns and implant-supported crowns with a mean follow-up of 5 years and to which extent do biological, technical, and aesthetic complications occur?
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The current use of patient-centered/reported outcomes in implant dentistry: a systematic review

            To provide an update on the use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the field of implant dentistry (1); to compare PROMs for prostheses supported by one or more implants to alternative treatment options or a healthy dentition (2).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures in dental implant research among dentate subjects.

              To conduct an evidence-based review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in dental implant research among dentate patients so as to gain an understanding of the use of such measures, and the potential evidence that can be gleaned from such studies. A structured literature search was carried out in the MEDLINE database. Patient-related end-points in dental implant research were categorized with respect to type of outcome and reviewed. The initial search identified 3397 publications; full texts were obtained for 133 papers, and ultimately 31 'effective papers'. PROMs were primarily concerned with assessment of patient satisfaction/preference (71%, 22). A range of prosthetic treatments associated with dental implants were identified. Few studies were prospective studies that included pre-treatment assessments. There was a lack of standardization in the assessment of patient-related outcomes. There is an increasing use of PROMs in dental implant research among dentate patients for a range of prosthetic treatments. For the most part studies have been concerned with the assessment of patient satisfaction/preference but fail to employ standardized outcome assessment methods, which hampers understanding of the benefit of dental implant therapy from patients' perspectives. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kl.ackermann@kirschackermann.de
                thomas.barth@dentale.de
                claudio@cacaci.de
                steffenkistler@web.de
                markus.schlee@32schoenezaehne.de
                stiller@implant-consult.de
                Journal
                Int J Implant Dent
                Int J Implant Dent
                International Journal of Implant Dentistry
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2198-4034
                8 April 2020
                8 April 2020
                December 2020
                : 6
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Filderstadt, Germany
                [2 ]Leipzig, Germany
                [3 ]Munich, Germany
                [4 ]Landsberg a. L., Germany
                [5 ]Forchheim, Germany
                [6 ]GRID grid.7839.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9721, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, , Goethe University Frankfurt, ; Frankfurt, Germany
                [7 ]Berlin, Germany
                Article
                211
                10.1186/s40729-020-00211-z
                7138872
                32266497
                0b796cce-6c5b-4b14-9649-93a186fdd6cc
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 16 December 2019
                : 12 March 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Oral Reconstruction Foundation
                Award ID: NISCAM01/10
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                dental implant,survival,bone level change,patient satisfaction,observational multicenter study,platform switching,conical connection,daily dental practice

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                10
                0
                4
                0
                Smart Citations
                10
                0
                4
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content83

                Cited by3

                Most referenced authors418