14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Cavity Disinfectants on Dentin Bond Strength and Clinical Success of Composite Restorations—A Systematic Review of In Vitro, In Situ and Clinical Studies

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cavity disinfection becomes an important step before a dental restorative procedure. The disinfection can be obtained cleaning the dental cavity with antimicrobial agents before the use of adhesive systems. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review on the effect of different cavity disinfectants on restorations’ adhesion and clinical success. A search was carried out through the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science. In vitro and in situ studies reporting results on dentin bond strength tests, and clinical studies published until August 2020, in English, Spanish and Portuguese were included. The methodological quality assessment of the clinical studies was carried out using the Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Chlorhexidine could preserve adhesion to dentin. EDTA and ethanol had positive results that should be further confirmed. Given the significant lack of scientific evidence, the use of lasers, fluoridated agents, sodium hypochlorite, or other products as cavity disinfectants should be avoided. Chlorhexidine is a safe option for cavity disinfection with adequate preservation of adhesion to dentin. Moreover, future researches should be focused on the efficacy of these disinfectants against cariogenic bacteria and their best application methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references197

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials.

            Resin composites have become the first choice for direct posterior restorations and are increasingly popular among clinicians and patients. Meanwhile, a number of clinical reports in the literature have discussed the durability of these restorations over long periods. In this review, we have searched the dental literature looking for clinical trials investigating posterior composite restorations over periods of at least 5 years of follow-up published between 1996 and 2011. The search resulted in 34 selected studies. 90% of the clinical studies indicated that annual failure rates between 1% and 3% can be achieved with Class I and II posterior composite restorations depending on several factors such as tooth type and location, operator, and socioeconomic, demographic, and behavioral elements. The material properties showed a minor effect on longevity. The main reasons for failure in the long term are secondary caries, related to the individual caries risk, and fracture, related to the presence of a lining or the strength of the material used as well as patient factors such as bruxism. Repair is a viable alternative to replacement, and it can increase significantly the lifetime of restorations. As observed in the literature reviewed, a long survival rate for posterior composite restorations can be expected provided that patient, operator and materials factors are taken into account when the restorations are performed. Copyright © 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Restorations in primary teeth: a systematic review on survival and reasons for failures

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                31 December 2020
                January 2021
                : 22
                : 1
                : 353
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Integrated Clinical Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal; ines.amaros@ 123456hotmail.com (I.A.); beatriznmfrascao@ 123456gmail.com (B.R.); inescarvalhomarcelino@ 123456gmail.com (I.M.); anabelabppaula@ 123456sapo.pt (A.P.); ze-93@ 123456hotmail.com (J.S.); cmiguel.marto@ 123456uc.pt (C.M.M.); eunicecarrilho@ 123456gmail.com (E.C.)
                [2 ]Area of Environment Genetics and Oncobiology (CIMAGO), Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-548 Coimbra, Portugal; m.mferreira@ 123456netcabo.pt
                [3 ]Clinical Academic Center of Coimbra (CACC), 3004-561 Coimbra, Portugal
                [4 ]Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Napoli, Italy; gspagnuo@ 123456unina.it
                [5 ]Institute of Dentistry, I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119435 Moscow, Russia
                [6 ]Institute of Endodontics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal
                [7 ]Institute of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-548 Coimbra, Portugal
                [8 ]Institute of Experimental Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, 3004-548 Coimbra, Portugal
                Author notes
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-7926
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-4173
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-9786
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-6161
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9269-5417
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5759-5557
                Article
                ijms-22-00353
                10.3390/ijms22010353
                7794949
                33396354
                08a39785-fb78-42a4-9a32-3acd8fa75eb9
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 13 December 2020
                : 27 December 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Molecular biology
                cavity disinfection,antimicrobial substances,chlorhexidine,adhesion,bonding,dental caries

                Comments

                Comment on this article