41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Gender, Culture, and Sex-Typed Cognitive Abilities

      research-article
      1 , *
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Although gender differences in cognitive abilities are frequently reported, the magnitude of these differences and whether they hold practical significance in the educational outcomes of boys and girls is highly debated. Furthermore, when gender gaps in reading, mathematics and science literacy are reported they are often attributed to innate, biological differences rather than social and cultural factors. Cross-cultural evidence may contribute to this debate, and this study reports national gender differences in reading, mathematics and science literacy from 65 nations participating in the 2009 round of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Consistently across all nations, girls outperform boys in reading literacy, d = −.44. Boys outperform girls in mathematics in the USA, d = .22 and across OECD nations, d = .13. For science literacy, while the USA showed the largest gender difference across all OECD nations, d = .14, gender differences across OECD nations were non-significant, and a small female advantage was found for non-OECD nations, d = −.09. Across all three domains, these differences were more pronounced at both tails of the distribution for low- and high-achievers. Considerable cross-cultural variability was also observed, and national gender differences were correlated with gender equity measures, economic prosperity, and Hofstede’s cultural dimension of power distance. Educational and societal implications of such gender gaps are addressed, as well as the mechanisms by which gender differences in cognitive abilities are culturally mediated.

          Related collections

          Most cited references61

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A threat in the air. How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance.

          C Steele (1997)
          A general theory of domain identification is used to describe achievement barriers still faced by women in advanced quantitative areas and by African Americans in school. The theory assumes that sustained school success requires identification with school and its subdomains; that societal pressures on these groups (e.g., economic disadvantage, gender roles) can frustrate this identification; and that in school domains where these groups are negatively stereotyped, those who have become domain identified face the further barrier of stereotype threat, the threat that others' judgments or their own actions will negatively stereotype them in the domain. Research shows that this threat dramatically depresses the standardized test performance of women and African Americans who are in the academic vanguard of their groups (offering a new interpretation of group differences in standardized test performance), that it causes disidentification with school, and that practices that reduce this threat can reduce these negative effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The gender similarities hypothesis.

            Janet Hyde (2005)
            The differences model, which argues that males and females are vastly different psychologically, dominates the popular media. Here, the author advances a very different view, the gender similarities hypothesis, which holds that males and females are similar on most, but not all, psychological variables. Results from a review of 46 meta-analyses support the gender similarities hypothesis. Gender differences can vary substantially in magnitude at different ages and depend on the context in which measurement occurs. Overinflated claims of gender differences carry substantial costs in areas such as the workplace and relationships. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.

              In recent years, the magnitude, consistency, and stability across time of cognitive sex differences have been questioned. The present study examined these issues in the context of spatial abilities. A meta-analysis of 286 effect sizes from a variety of spatial ability measures was conducted. Effect sizes were partitioned by the specific test used and by a number of variables related to the experimental procedure in order to achieve homogeneity. Results showed that sex differences are significant in several tests but that some intertest differences exist. Partial support was found for the notion that the magnitude of sex differences has decreased in recent years. Finally, it was found that the age of emergence of sex differences depends on the test used. Results are discussed with regard to their implications for the study of sex differences in spatial abilities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                10 July 2012
                : 7
                : 7
                : e39904
                Affiliations
                [1]School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
                University Of São Paulo, Brazil
                Author notes

                Analyzed the data: DR. Wrote the paper: DR.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-07405
                10.1371/journal.pone.0039904
                3393715
                22808072
                08368301-31ad-444c-8d7e-83af9318eb51
                David Reilly. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 29 February 2012
                : 28 May 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Cognition
                Earth Sciences
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Cultural Geography
                Mathematics
                Medicine
                Mental Health
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Human Intelligence
                Learning
                Science Policy
                Science Education
                Social and Behavioral Sciences
                Anthropology
                Cultural Anthropology
                Geography
                Human Geography
                Cultural Geography
                Linguistics
                Sociolinguistics
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Human Performance
                Cognitive Psychology
                Human Intelligence
                Learning
                Applied Psychology
                Science Education
                Literacy
                Training
                Sociology
                Culture
                Cross Culture (Sociology)
                Sexual and Gender Issues

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article