12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Non-melanoma skin cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This is the official guideline endorsed by the specialty associations involved in the care of head and neck cancer patients in the UK. This paper provides consensus recommendations on the management of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region on the basis of current evidence.

          Recommendations

          • Royal College of Pathologists minimum datasets for NMSC should be adhered to in order to improve patient care and help work-force planning in pathology departments. (G)

          • Tumour depth is of critical importance in identifying high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and should be reported in all cases. (R)

          • Appropriate imaging to determine the extent of primary NMSC is indicated when peri-neural involvement or bony invasion is suspected. (R)

          • In the clinically N0 neck, radiological imaging is not beneficial, and a policy of watchful waiting and patient education can be adopted. (R)

          • Patients with high-risk NMSC should be treated by members of a skin cancer multidisciplinary team (MDT) in secondary care. (G)

          • Non-infiltrative basal cell carcinoma (BCC) <2 cm in size should be excised with a margin of 4–5 mm. Smaller margins (2–3 mm) may be taken in sites where reconstructive options are limited, when reconstruction should be delayed. (R)

          • Where there is a high risk of recurrence, delayed reconstruction or Mohs micrographic surgery should be used. (R)

          • Surgical excision of low-risk cSCC with a margin of 4 mm or greater is the treatment of choice. (R)

          • High-risk cSCC should be excised with a margin of 6 mm or greater. (R).

          • Mohs micrographic surgery has a role in some high-risk cSCC cases following MDT discussion. (R)

          • Delayed reconstruction should be used in high-risk cSCC. (G)

          • Intra-operative conventional frozen section in cSCC is not recommended. (G)

          • Radiotherapy (RT) is an effective therapy for primary BCC and cSCC. (R)

          • Re-excision should be carried out for incompletely excised high-risk BCC or where there is deep margin involvement. (R)

          • Incompletely excised high-risk cSCC should be re-excised. (R)

          • Further surgery should involve confirmed marginal clearance before reconstruction. (R)

          • P+ N0 disease: Resection should include involved parotid tissue, combined with levels I–III neck dissection, to include the external jugular node. (R)

          • P+ N+ disease: Resection should include level V if that level is clinically or radiologically involved. (R)

          • Adjuvant RT should include level V if not dissected. (R)

          • P0 N+ disease: Anterior neck disease should be managed with levels I–IV neck dissection to include the external jugular node. (R)

          • P0 N+ posterior echelon nodal disease (i.e. occipital or post-auricular) should undergo dissection of levels II–V, with sparing of level I. (R)

          • Consider treatment of the ipsilateral parotid if the primary site is the anterior scalp, temple or forehead. (R)

          • All patients should receive education in self-examination and skin cancer prevention measures. (G)

          • Patients who have had a single completely excised BCC or low-risk cSCC can be discharged after a single post-operative visit. (G)

          • Patients with an excised high-risk cSCC should be reviewed three to six monthly for two years, with further annual review depending upon clinical risk. (G)

          • Those with recurrent or multiple BCCs should be offered annual review. (G)

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma.

          This article represents a planned regular updating of the previous British Association of Dermatologists guidelines for the management of basal cell carcinoma. These guidelines present evidence-based guidance for treatment, with identification of the strength of evidence available at the time of preparation of the guidelines, and a brief overview of epidemiological aspects, diagnosis and investigation.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice.

            Patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) may develop metastatic SCC to nodes in the head and neck. Recent data support best outcome with the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy. This study aims to present further supportive evidence. Retrospective chart review. Patients were identified with metastatic cutaneous SCC to nodes of the head and neck treated with surgery or surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Relapse and outcome were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Between 1980 to 2000, 167 patients were treated with curative intent at Westmead Hospital, Sydney. Median age was 67 years (range, 34-95) in 143 men and 24 women with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Patients underwent surgery (21/167; 13%), or surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (146/167; 87%). The majority (98/167; 59%) of metastatic nodes were located in the parotid and/or cervical nodes. The remaining 69 (41%) had metastatic cervical nodes (levels I-V). Forty-seven patients (28%) had recurrences, with the majority (35/47; 74%) as locoregional failures. On multivariate analysis, spread to multiple nodes and single-modality treatment significantly predicted worse survival. Patients undergoing combined treatment had a lower rate of locoregional recurrence (20% vs. 43%) and a significantly better 5-year disease-free survival rate (73% vs. 54%; P = .004) compared to surgery alone. In patients with metastatic cutaneous head and neck SCC, surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy provide the best chance of achieving locoregional control and should be considered best practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Interventions for basal cell carcinoma of the skin.

              Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest skin cancer. BCCs are slow-growing, locally invasive, epidermal skin tumours which mainly affect white skinned people. The first line treatment is usually surgical excision, but numerous alternatives are available. To assess the effects of treatments for basal cell carcinoma. We searched the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register (January 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane LIbrary Issue 1, 2006), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (2004 to January 2006), EMBASE (2005 to January 2006), the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (February 2006). Cited references of all trials identified and key review articles were searched. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted where appropriate for reviews or unpublished trials. Inclusion criteria were adults with one or more histologically proven, primary basal cell carcinoma. The primary outcome measure was recurrence at three to five years, measured clinically. The secondary outcome included early treatment failure within six months, measured histologically. Adverse treatment effects included aesthetic appearance and pain during and after treatment. Two authors independantly carried out study selection and assessment of methodological quality. Twenty seven studies were identified. Only one RCT of surgery versus radiotherapy had primary outcome data at four years, showing significantly more persistent tumours and recurrences in the radiotherapy group as compared to the surgery group, (RR 0.09, 95%CI, 0.01 to 0.69). One study found no significant difference for recurrence at 30 months when Moh's micrographic surgery was compared to surgery for high risk facial BCCs, (RR 0.64, 95%CI 0.16,2.64). One study of methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL PDT) versus cryotherapy found no significant difference in recurrences in the MAL PDT group when compared to cryotherapy at one year (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22,1.12). Cryotherapy showed no significant difference in recurrences at one year when compared to surgery on one small study. When radiotherapy was compared to cryotherapy there were significantly fewer recurrences at one year in the radiotherapy group compared to the cryotherapy group.Short-term studies suggest a success rate of 87 to 88% for imiquimod in the treatment of superficial BCC using a once-daily regimen for 6 weeks and a 76% treatment response when treating nodular BCC for 12 weeks, when measured histologically. Overall there has been very little good quality research on treatments for BCC. Most trials have only evaluated BCCs in low risk locations. Surgery and radiotherapy appear to be the most effective treatments with surgery showing the lowest failure rates. Although cosmetic outcomes appear good with PDT, long term follow up data are needed. Other treatments might have some use but few have been compared to surgery. An ongoing study comparing imiquimod to surgery should clarify whether imiquimod is a useful option.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Laryngol Otol
                J Laryngol Otol
                JLO
                The Journal of Laryngology and Otology
                Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, UK )
                0022-2151
                1748-5460
                May 2016
                : 130
                : Suppl 2
                : S125-S132
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford, UK
                [2 ]Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Ayrshire and Arran Health Board , UK
                [3 ]Department of Dermatology, Southport and Ormskirk NHS Trust , Ormskirk, UK
                [4 ]Department of Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford, UK
                [5 ]Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Manchester Royal Infirmary , Oxford Road, Manchester, UK
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Carrie Newlands, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Royal Surrey County Hospital , Guildford, UK E-mail: carrienewlands@ 123456googlemail.com
                Article
                S0022215116000554 00055
                10.1017/S0022215116000554
                4873942
                27841126
                077be03e-8b66-4983-8a61-17c0d166908c
                © JLO (1984) Limited 2016

                This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, References: 19, Pages: 8
                Categories
                Guidelines

                Comments

                Comment on this article