Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
86
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Association Between mRNA Vaccination and COVID-19 Hospitalization and Disease Severity

      1 , 2 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 3 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 11 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 19 , 20 , 20 , 21 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 25 , 26 , 26 , 27 , 27 , 28 , 28 , 29 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 7 , 32 , 32 , 32 , 33 , 33 , 34 , 34 , 34 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , Influenza and Other Viruses in the Acutely Ill (IVY) Network
      JAMA
      American Medical Association (AMA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine

          Abstract Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) have afflicted tens of millions of people in a worldwide pandemic. Safe and effective vaccines are needed urgently. Methods In an ongoing multinational, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, pivotal efficacy trial, we randomly assigned persons 16 years of age or older in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses, 21 days apart, of either placebo or the BNT162b2 vaccine candidate (30 μg per dose). BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle–formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine that encodes a prefusion stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. The primary end points were efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 and safety. Results A total of 43,548 participants underwent randomization, of whom 43,448 received injections: 21,720 with BNT162b2 and 21,728 with placebo. There were 8 cases of Covid-19 with onset at least 7 days after the second dose among participants assigned to receive BNT162b2 and 162 cases among those assigned to placebo; BNT162b2 was 95% effective in preventing Covid-19 (95% credible interval, 90.3 to 97.6). Similar vaccine efficacy (generally 90 to 100%) was observed across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, ethnicity, baseline body-mass index, and the presence of coexisting conditions. Among 10 cases of severe Covid-19 with onset after the first dose, 9 occurred in placebo recipients and 1 in a BNT162b2 recipient. The safety profile of BNT162b2 was characterized by short-term, mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site, fatigue, and headache. The incidence of serious adverse events was low and was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups. Conclusions A two-dose regimen of BNT162b2 conferred 95% protection against Covid-19 in persons 16 years of age or older. Safety over a median of 2 months was similar to that of other viral vaccines. (Funded by BioNTech and Pfizer; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine

            Abstract Background Vaccines are needed to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) and to protect persons who are at high risk for complications. The mRNA-1273 vaccine is a lipid nanoparticle–encapsulated mRNA-based vaccine that encodes the prefusion stabilized full-length spike protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus that causes Covid-19. Methods This phase 3 randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at 99 centers across the United States. Persons at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection or its complications were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two intramuscular injections of mRNA-1273 (100 μg) or placebo 28 days apart. The primary end point was prevention of Covid-19 illness with onset at least 14 days after the second injection in participants who had not previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2. Results The trial enrolled 30,420 volunteers who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either vaccine or placebo (15,210 participants in each group). More than 96% of participants received both injections, and 2.2% had evidence (serologic, virologic, or both) of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline. Symptomatic Covid-19 illness was confirmed in 185 participants in the placebo group (56.5 per 1000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 48.7 to 65.3) and in 11 participants in the mRNA-1273 group (3.3 per 1000 person-years; 95% CI, 1.7 to 6.0); vaccine efficacy was 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3 to 96.8%; P<0.001). Efficacy was similar across key secondary analyses, including assessment 14 days after the first dose, analyses that included participants who had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at baseline, and analyses in participants 65 years of age or older. Severe Covid-19 occurred in 30 participants, with one fatality; all 30 were in the placebo group. Moderate, transient reactogenicity after vaccination occurred more frequently in the mRNA-1273 group. Serious adverse events were rare, and the incidence was similar in the two groups. Conclusions The mRNA-1273 vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy at preventing Covid-19 illness, including severe disease. Aside from transient local and systemic reactions, no safety concerns were identified. (Funded by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; COVE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04470427.)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Incubation Period of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) From Publicly Reported Confirmed Cases: Estimation and Application

              Background: A novel human coronavirus, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was identified in China in December 2019. There is limited support for many of its key epidemiologic features, including the incubation period for clinical disease (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]), which has important implications for surveillance and control activities. Objective: To estimate the length of the incubation period of COVID-19 and describe its public health implications. Design: Pooled analysis of confirmed COVID-19 cases reported between 4 January 2020 and 24 February 2020. Setting: News reports and press releases from 50 provinces, regions, and countries outside Wuhan, Hubei province, China. Participants: Persons with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection outside Hubei province, China. Measurements: Patient demographic characteristics and dates and times of possible exposure, symptom onset, fever onset, and hospitalization. Results: There were 181 confirmed cases with identifiable exposure and symptom onset windows to estimate the incubation period of COVID-19. The median incubation period was estimated to be 5.1 days (95% CI, 4.5 to 5.8 days), and 97.5% of those who develop symptoms will do so within 11.5 days (CI, 8.2 to 15.6 days) of infection. These estimates imply that, under conservative assumptions, 101 out of every 10 000 cases (99th percentile, 482) will develop symptoms after 14 days of active monitoring or quarantine. Limitation: Publicly reported cases may overrepresent severe cases, the incubation period for which may differ from that of mild cases. Conclusion: This work provides additional evidence for a median incubation period for COVID-19 of approximately 5 days, similar to SARS. Our results support current proposals for the length of quarantine or active monitoring of persons potentially exposed to SARS-CoV-2, although longer monitoring periods might be justified in extreme cases. Primary Funding Source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, and Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA
                JAMA
                American Medical Association (AMA)
                0098-7484
                November 04 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]CDC COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia
                [2 ]Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [3 ]Baylor Scott & White Health, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Temple
                [4 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [5 ]Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
                [6 ]Departments of Medicine and Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [7 ]Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [8 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City
                [9 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
                [10 ]Department of Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
                [11 ]Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
                [12 ]Departments of Emergency Medicine and Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
                [13 ]Department of Medicine, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota
                [14 ]Department of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus
                [15 ]Department of Medicine, Montefiore Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
                [16 ]Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
                [17 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
                [18 ]Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts
                [19 ]Department of Medicine, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, Utah; and University of Utah, Salt Lake City
                [20 ]School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [21 ]Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
                [22 ]Department of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
                [23 ]Emory Critical Care Center, Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, Georgia
                [24 ]Department of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
                [25 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
                [26 ]Department of Medicine, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles
                [27 ]Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
                [28 ]Department of Medicine, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri
                [29 ]Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [30 ]Departments of Internal Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
                [31 ]Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [32 ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [33 ]Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                [34 ]Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
                Article
                10.1001/jama.2021.19499
                34734975
                06fa36c1-8e8a-4f6a-a6d9-4ff6f5f90141
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Smart Citations
                0
                0
                0
                0
                Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
                View Citations

                See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

                scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

                Similar content1,461

                Cited by327

                Most referenced authors1,782