1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Content validation and psychometric evaluation of the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire for hereditary angioedema

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There is considerable burden of illness in hereditary angioedema (HAE). However, instruments to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in HAE are limited. The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) was developed to measure HRQoL in patients with recurrent angioedema; the validity of the AE-QoL in patients with HAE is described.

          Methods

          To identify disease-related experiences with a focus on the impact of HAE on HRQoL, interviews were conducted with a group of clinician experts and patients with HAE from Canada, France, Germany, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States, along with a targeted literature review. Concepts were mapped to the AE-QoL to assess item relevance, interpretation, and conceptual coverage. Cognitive interviews assessed item clarity and relevance. A psychometric validation was performed using data from a phase 3 trial.

          Results

          Interviews were conducted with seven clinicians and 40 adult patients. Patients reported 35 unique impacts of HAE on their lives, the most frequent being on work/school, social relationships, physical activities, and emotions, particularly fear/worrying and anxiety. Saturation for these impacts was reached, and all concepts covered in the AE-QoL were reported during the interviews. Patients agreed that the questionnaire items and response options were clear and relevant, and the 4-week recall period was appropriate. The psychometric validation included data from 64 patients. For AE-QoL total scores, excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.90), test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient > 0.80), convergent validity with the Sheehan Disability Scale (r = 0.663), divergent validity with the EQ-5D-5L index (r = 0.292) and EQ-VAS (r = 0.337), and known-groups validity ( p < 0.0001; ɳ2 = 0.56) were demonstrated.

          Conclusions

          Qualitative and psychometric analyses showed that the AE-QoL is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring HRQoL in adult patients with HAE from six countries.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-023-00576-w.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

          Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

            Regression methods were used to select and score 12 items from the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) to reproduce the Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary scales in the general US population (n=2,333). The resulting 12-item short-form (SF-12) achieved multiple R squares of 0.911 and 0.918 in predictions of the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and SF-36 Mental Component Summary scores, respectively. Scoring algorithms from the general population used to score 12-item versions of the two components (Physical Components Summary and Mental Component Summary) achieved R squares of 0.905 with the SF-36 Physical Component Summary and 0.938 with SF-36 Mental Component Summary when cross-validated in the Medical Outcomes Study. Test-retest (2-week)correlations of 0.89 and 0.76 were observed for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the 12-item Mental Component Summary, respectively, in the general US population (n=232). Twenty cross-sectional and longitudinal tests of empirical validity previously published for the 36-item short-form scales and summary measures were replicated for the 12-item Physical Component Summary and the 12-item Mental Component Summary, including comparisons between patient groups known to differ or to change in terms of the presence and seriousness of physical and mental conditions, acute symptoms, age and aging, self-reported 1-year changes in health, and recovery for depression. In 14 validity tests involving physical criteria, relative validity estimates for the 12-item Physical Component Summary ranged from 0.43 to 0.93 (median=0.67) in comparison with the best 36-item short-form scale. Relative validity estimates for the 12-item Mental Component Summary in 6 tests involving mental criteria ranged from 0.60 to 107 (median=0.97) in relation to the best 36-item short-form scale. Average scores for the 2 summary measures, and those for most scales in the 8-scale profile based on the 12-item short-form, closely mirrored those for the 36-item short-form, although standard errors were nearly always larger for the 12-item short-form.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life

              (1990)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                magdi.vanya@takeda.com
                Journal
                J Patient Rep Outcomes
                J Patient Rep Outcomes
                Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2509-8020
                3 April 2023
                3 April 2023
                December 2023
                : 7
                : 33
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ICON plc, South San Francisco, CA USA
                [2 ]Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, Switzerland
                [3 ]GRID grid.67033.31, ISNI 0000 0000 8934 4045, Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy, ; Boston, MA USA
                [4 ]ICON plc, Reading, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.418848.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0458 4007, IQVIA, ; San Francisco, CA USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.512479.c, ISNI 0000 0004 0422 5055, Mapi Research Trust, ; Lyon, France
                [7 ]GRID grid.419849.9, ISNI 0000 0004 0447 7762, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc, ; Lexington, MA USA
                [8 ]GRID grid.6363.0, ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, Institute of Allergology, , Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie, Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, ; Berlin, Germany
                [9 ]Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Immunology and Allergology, Berlin, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-3843
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1139-0078
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4437-0313
                Article
                576
                10.1186/s41687-023-00576-w
                10070575
                37012445
                0677124a-ebaf-4dec-9ebf-db19daa3e88a
                © The Author(s) 2023

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 8 November 2022
                : 14 March 2023
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007343, Shire;
                Award ID: N/A
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2023

                content validity,hereditary angioedema,patient-reported outcomes,validity,psychometric,quality of life

                Comments

                Comment on this article